Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 61 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

A few observations from a casual lurker:

-transistors with only two leads connected can be used as special purpose diodes
-transistors in the TO-3 case (like 2n3055) have the Collector hooked to the Case, and in the TO-220 or TO-247 package like many TIPs and mosfets the collector or drain is connected to the case tab
-some heavy current, fast diodes actually do come in the TO-3 or TO-220 case and so only need two wires anyway
-heavy conductors like the tubing can be necessary if there is a lot of reactive power to be handled, which may be confined only to the area of the heavy tubing by the circuit/freqs involved


Acca

To: Wesley.

Thanks for the ref. to Dr. K. Turtur as he has found a potential (X) to generate a vortex to produce mechanical movement. His discoveries are also very close to my demonstration of a "magnetvortex" produced when a voltage potential is applied to a magnet under water. I show that there is spin of the gas bubbles from the cracking of water and the bubbles are entrained in the magnetic vortex, however when this same voltage potential is applied to same size and weight of metal I get no spinning vortex as well as entrained bubbles, in fact the bubbles just go straight up,  it looks as Lorentz transformation is wrong when it is applied in my case. I have proof in real time that the magnetic flux of so called is actually wrong.  It looks like a field of a tornado vortex.

Michael Snyder has discovered another way to image magnetic fields a photo is included (link below). He has also developed a new tool to see the "different type of magnetic flux?". So far I am the only person and possibly one other who has shown this effect under water. It looks like there are multiple "fields emanating  from the standard neo magnet when potential is applied to it. A link is posted to a pdf. paper that validates this Lorentz transformation below..

It is possible to utilize a neo magnet to generate a CW or a CCW rotation by applying a voltage to the side of a magnet and get a invisible spinning vortex just like described by Josef Hasslberger (link below). His photo is showing this vortex below.

This is a quote by Josef Hasslberger: ( he might be actually right !)

"I propose that magnetism is associated with the spin of a particle or mass and that the magnetic field is caused by a dual macroscopic vortex in the background of space, converging on the particle or mass, which polarizes two separate regions of space into a difference of potential. What we call magnetic field lines are not field lines at all, but simply the intervening space between two poles of different potential, held in place in space by the source of magnetism. One might also call this phenomenon a distortion or stress of space background. The electric current induced in a conductor that cuts "magnetic field lines" is an alleviation of the stress of space background. 

    Polarity of magnetic stress is determined by the direction of spin of the vortex. Magnetic poles repel if the associated vortices are of the same direction of spin, they attract if their spins are diverse.

    Permanent magnets cause the vortices and consequent stress of space fabric by a permanent alignment of their nuclear spin.

    The magnetic field around a conductor in which an electric current flows, is a consequence of the alignment of the spin of the charges moving along that conductor.

    Physicists have been looking, so far without success, for a magnetic "monopole", a magnetic phenomenon that has only a single pole. If magnetism, as postulated here, is a stress phenomenon, then it is clear why the monopole could not be found.

    On a nuclear level, the strong force holding atoms together and determining electron orbits could well be the same magnetic force." 

Here are links to "new magnetism as it's been discovered by people like us" I hope this will put a new spin on the ferrite toroids as the magnetic fields are just more than flux lines, they look much, much, more complex than they seem... Al..



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-odQHTLXao&feature=plcp     Please read the caption at the bottom of my video...

redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V11NO2PDF/V11N2ENG.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AZAjsdiNeM&list=UUSR-vy_Ue0raYCGMwtw4uqg&index=9&feature=plcp

http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/iatl/ejournal/issues/volume2issue1/snyder

http://www.sendspace.com/folder/on9dhg

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0805/0805.4364.pdf

http://theunlitpipe.com/Hele-shaw.html#47

http://www.nanomagnetics.us/

http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/12/17/electric.current.moves.magnetic.vortices

http://www.hasslberger.com/phy/phy_1.htm


forest

Quote from: andrea76 on July 26, 2012, 02:35:55 AM
  Can this be?

Anything is possible if you dind't know the underlying concept. Even there could possibly exists two almost identical looking devices but each based on different concept. However without concept you can put your replication in the museum of extraordinary crap things. :P