Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[27Bubba]

"Question: Where is the bi-toroid transformer in the 2004 video? The transformer behind the coil has one primary and two secondary coils. Could it be that TK somehow »misused« it as a bi-toroid transformer? "

Is it possible TK hid the second transformer in the green box? Or the transformer w/primary, double secondary is borderline sufficient...  Anyhow, in my case I getting ready to some experimenting with the primary, double secondary transformer because there is not a way for me to get one of the "green" ones in my neck of the woods..

[wattsup]

@all

I could not find triaxial cable at my local EE shop. So I will have to source it elsewhere.

They did have a range of interesting wire types with shielding but center wire was multi-stranded.

Anyways, I wanted to know the length required so I made an excel sheet starting with a 1 1/4" dia. open center and considering the wire would be about 1/4" in diameter, the final result, (shown below) is 122 feet. Then add the extra lengths of about 8 feet maximum and you get a length of 130 feet required to make the TKc.

Lots of last posts have inaccurate methods so please make sure you know how the device is built before commenting on function.

wattsup

Added:

So all, you do not need to start going on wild goose chases trying to see where this or that is in other builds, you have to realize that everything is relative to the total output of the build. Small units do not need triple transformer since on any flyback you can add the number of turns required for feedback energy, etc. TK has already shown us that anything you do right up to the HV output is very variable in terms of building the complete device. In the Aq2v, TK just used the triple transformer most likely because they had one on hand and it provided both the HV output (farthest coil #3), the ambient field of the Coily Coils from secondary of coils #1 and #2, and the feedback to loop the drive system via the primaries of coils #1 and #2. This has to be the basic design because there are no other wires able to bring energy back to the drive circuit

Also, there is a progression in the TKc design as well. I imagine this will still evolve for a while before a set standard for best results in understood.

[x_name41]

This in no case no relation in the bi toroid, resonances and etc. because his device a very simple...

[Jon_sparky]

@Jon_sparky
The reason that a ground is required is the work is being extracted from the magnetic field. If you were to pull the power out of the tuned circuit and not have a supply of electrons on the other side of it you would simply get an enormous voltage but no additional work in the magnetic field.

If you have a supply of electrons on the other side then you should see an increase in the magnetic field which can be extracted from the coil that feeds the load.

Does that make sense to you?

I think - you are describing "asynchronous resonance" is a key to "over unity",
that sees the circuit as a resonant valve and converter not a generator.
The energy can be pulled through the circuit to load only when, it is blind to back emf, and sets up pulsed resonance with the background environmental source, which in this case is via the earth-braided rad. The only way I imagine to do this is with a three plate or coil cap combination. One plate maintains or matches resonance, the other two are loading and discharging like a pump. Maybe otherways? Ideas are fast converging here

[tak22]

@all

Ref: Barbat patent page 13 - flexible Niobium-zirconium wire as low temperature (cryogenic) superconductor for current amplifier coil.

I've researched the Barbat patent for years now and from my communications with him I see nothing in the TK units that you would be able to identify. If it's the same it would have had to be a very very lucky find by TK of an appropriate high tech material, it's definitely NOT 'laughingly easy'. You're best to continue with other theories in my opinion.


tak