Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Bernhard]

@Zeitmaschine


Interesting similarity    , I will tomorrow try to experiment it




(while I experiment a resonance of one and three phase engines)

[Hoppy]

@allI've researched the Barbat patent for years now and from my communications with him I see nothing in the TK units that you would be able to identify. If it's the same it would have had to be a very very lucky find by TK of an appropriate high tech material, it's definitely NOT 'laughingly easy'. You're best to continue with other theories in my opinion.


tak

Thanks Tak. Having read the patent for the first time, it certainly does not read easy!

Hoppy

[engpjk]

Hi,

I have just had an e-mail from Dmitry Papalashvili saying that he has worked out the resonance details at work in TK's coil which he displays on his Russian-language web site http://tarielkapanadze.ru/science.htm and as I am not great at following Russian let alone resonance theory, perhaps some of you accomplished Russian speakers might be able to assess what is being said and post your comments on it.

Thanks,

Patrick

[Zeitmaschine]

it's definitely NOT 'laughingly easy'. You're best to continue with other theories in my opinion.

No problem!

This in no case no relation in the bi toroid, resonances and etc. because his device a very simple...

I'm with you. A very simple device is that what we are looking for!

Since all my experiments (and that of others) with spark gaps have failed so far (to produce free energy), I'm convinced that the TK principle has something to do with Back EMF. Reverse the Back EMF by some appropriate means, thus instead of having the Back EMF working against you, let it work with you ...

The whole thing with spark gaps, huge coils and high frequency is just a scam in order to (mis)lead people in a completely wrong direction.
The key could be Unilateral Induction, or something better.

Let's try some meditation:

Connecting the primary coil of a 50Hz transformer to 220V AC results in a small amount of current flowing through the primary. As soon as a load is connected to the secondary coil there is a current passing through this secondary coil (without load there is only voltage). This current creates a magnetic field in the core opposite to the magnetic field created by the primary coil, therefore the primary coil starts drawing a higher current from the power supply equal to the demand of the load. If now this magnetic back field could be eliminated (or even: reversed), then such a transformer could provide output energy without consuming (the equal amount of) input energy. And this is exactly that what can be observed in the Kapanadze videos!

So, since the Back EMF created by the secondary coil is precisely opposite to the magnetic field created by the primary coil, and since a 220V transformer runs usually on 50Hz/60Hz AC, then what would happen if (by some appropriate means) the current in the secondary coil gets shifted in phase about 180 degrees? Instead of counteracting the current in the primary coil it would in fact magnify the magnetic field (keywords: Tesla's magnifying transformer; energy creation by energy consumption) initially created by the primary coil, wouldn't it?

Now I could use quite a few ideas regarding the »appropriate means« to achieve a 180 degrees phase shift in the secondary coil of a transformer (preferably an off-the-shelf transformer, since I'm too lazy to wind one myself) ...

So, what about the use of capacitors (like in the well-known image below)? If the electric motor has a secret (according to Peter Lindemann) then the electric transformer could also have a secret, couldn't it?

If 180 degrees phase shift is not the Kapanadze principle of work, then I'm ready for the Gummizelle (padded cell) soon.

[Farmhand]

When three batteries are used like that the third battery becomes a load and is charged
by the load current which is through the load and the second battery. No free energy there.

The reversed third battery is part of the load, if the load is inductive some of energy from the magnetic field
may be recovered to the third battery but that depends on the load, how it is configured and if it is switched or not.

It's a basic Tesla switch, it switches potential from one/some batteries to another through a load, minus the energy dissipated by the load.

To run a 12 volt lamp in this way you need three 12 volt batteries two for supply and one to act as the other half of the 24 volt load.
The power out is calculated by the current out of the 24 volts battery stack, the power charging the third battery is calculated by
the current into it and it's voltage. The rest is dissipated in the lamp. 

The thing to remember is the third battery is actually a "load" just like any battery being charged.


Cheers