Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[27Bubba]

"Anyways, I wanted to know the length required so I made an excel sheet starting with a 1 1/4" dia. open center and considering the wire would be about 1/4" in diameter, the final result, (shown below) is 122 feet. Then add the extra lengths of about 8 feet maximum and you get a length of 130 feet required to make the TKc."

@wattsup

I appreciate the chart. Great idea.

So based on .25 dia wire *64 turns=16 inches of wounded width . That seems allot longer than TK "blue"coil
Plus add another 2 inch for the "coily" coil that's 18" = 0.457 2 meter for our metric friends..

Or I'm I wrong

[x_name41]

I would like to draw attention to capacitor specifications, you've probably seen it in the catalogs of manufacturers of a capacitors indicated the capacitor discharge current depending on the frequency and as the higher the frequency the greater is the discharge current of the capacitor!

[angryScientist]

I think - you are describing "asynchronous resonance" is a key to "over unity",
that sees the circuit as a resonant valve and converter not a generator.
The energy can be pulled through the circuit to load only when, it is blind to back emf, and sets up pulsed resonance with the background environmental source, which in this case is via the earth-braided rad. The only way I imagine to do this is with a three plate or coil cap combination. One plate maintains or matches resonance, the other two are loading and discharging like a pump. Maybe otherways? Ideas are fast converging here

To tell the truth, I have never heard of "asynchronous resonance." I have no idea what it means. Is it two tuned circuits that don't operate on the same frequency?

Here is a factoid that may apply to "asynchronous resonance", what ever it is.
If you take two identical tuned circuits, each one, taken separately, will resonate at the same frequency. Once you magnetically couple them together  neither of them will oscillate at the frequency that they are built to operate at. Instead, one will operate at a slightly higher frequency and the other at a slightly lower frequency. The degree of movement from the designed resonant frequency is said to depend on the degree of coupling of the two circuits.

Cool huh?

For some reason I had thought that this would happen with any kind of coupling but I just looked it up, to confirm what I was saying was true, and it is only with magnetic coupling.

Here is the quote; RCA RADIOTRON DESIGNER'S HANDBOOK, Fourth Edition, 1953 Chapter 9, Section 8, page 418
"(i) Mutual inductive coupling
As already emphasized, when the mutual inductive coupling between two tuned circuits is increased above a critical value, kt, two peaks appear in the response curve, symmetrically situated with regard to the resonant frequency f0. No other types of coupling possess this useful property."

I happen to have the printed book but you can get a scaned PDF from this link:
http://www.nj7p.info/Common/Manuals/Tube_Manuals.php

This brings something else to mind. I have been thinking about Tesla's obscure "Shuttle theory", that I think my grandfather had some how been hinting at by the things he gave me when he was alive, several books on Tesla and a book about the space shuttle. My grandfather was a professor and no dummy. He had intimated that free energy does exist but we would only get it if society was ready else we would end up destroying ourselves and or the planet.

I keep wondering about the picture below. Why is Tesla looking so intently at the coils in his hand? Note that they are at right angles to each other and therefore not magnetically coupled. Does this have to do with his "Shuttle theory"? If the coils are not magnetically coupled then they could be electrically coupled. This could be a indicating a later design than his Magnifying Transmitter, which was both magnetically coupled and electrically coupled. Note the big ash tray looking thing behind him. I think that might be his "Death ray".

Sorry, this has little to do with the topic of this thread. Just a nostalgic trip down memory lane for me.

[wattsup]

@27Bubba

Yes you are right, but the 1/4" was only to have a base. If the wire is thinner, then you need less then 130 feet. I just wanted to know around what length in case I saw a good deal for 120' of thinner, then I know it will do the job. Just as a guide. The other table also says to me that this wire will handle the load. Crazy as it sounds, these thin wires can rock.

@all

Some logic on the Coily Coil (CoCo) connection points to the transformer coils. The wires from the transformer are thin and will move around easily. The wires from the CoCo are rigid and will not move around easily making the connection (solder) point very stable. So then why go to the trouble of tapping them up? Is it possible they put something inside those connections. If they were tapped up for electric shock prevention, then why did they not tape up the connections on the transformers. They are just as shock prone.

I could swear I see something close up but cannot be certain enough without more opinions. More eyes.

wattsup

[27Bubba]

@wattsup
So as I understand it... TK stripped the braided wire and the sheathing and wound the coil using inner insulator w center conductor? If that the case the inner dielectric insulator measure less than 3/16"..