Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 198 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: sparks on September 23, 2012, 10:51:21 AM
A spacecraft slingshotting it's way through the solar system uses the gravitational field of various planets.  Does the spacecraft convert the gravitational potential energy of the planet into kinetic energy?  If that is the case then gravity becomes a scource of energy and not a force.
No, the slingshot gravity assist manouver around a planet does not work if the planet is not moving.  If it is moving, then the linear momentum gained by the spaceship is equal in magnitude to that lost by the planet. 
Just like bouncing a ball off of a moving train.

verpies

Quote from: sparks on September 23, 2012, 10:51:21 AM
The antiquated laws of conservation of energy have been broken consistently for at least 80 years. 
I don't claim that it is impossible - just not that way.
Most likely it's just a matter of "drawing a proper box"....  for example if your accelerated electron hits a nucleus and causes it to fall apart (through some kind of inelastic collision) then the particles liberated from the nucleus might appear to have greater energy than the incoming electron. 
Especially when the initial nucleus' binding energy is not accounted for - "not in the box".

forest

little offtopic....

What is the reason of electric  resistance  ?

Stupid man guess : resistance is always creating heat. Heat is EM radiation of high frequency (plus molecules vibration which is rather the effect of heat wave impact). If this is true then through resistance energy is escaping like sound ,taking energy from vibrating string. Seems that resistance is more likely a kind of inductance of very low value or the principle behind resistance and inductance is the same ????? Going further and assuming that in very low temperature resistance of conductor is close to zero and it's confirmed why I have never heard about testing inductance of conductor in very low temperature ? That would uncover the differences.

What I'm trying to tell is that without understanding of every fundamental properties of world around we are easly manipulated by the wrong ideas covered by marvellous mathematical constructs.
Our enterprise should be to understand electricity to such level that we can build self-sustaining circuits.


wattsup

@Zeitmaschine

You are right, the diode plate could be bakelite or other plastic type which means those diode anodes may be isolated on that diode plate. Taking that as a new cue, I had to figure out the logic of having those two diode cathodes with that copper connector. Than came the flash..........

Let me run this by you in terms of logic. What if this whole device works backwards and the diode plate is isolated and is really a full bridge rectifier. The only possible logic to that usage is that the heavy coil is really being used as a primary. This counters all logic since we see the AC feed from the inverter is going to the other coil which is really the secondary.

Are your ready for some mind bending.....

See diagram below......

The inverter output goes to transformer A at 1-2 (which is really the secondary) that precharges the primary side B but the bridge rectifier does not let it go any further back. Then 1-2 becomes line AC 5 that goes to the Tin Can 14.

We are thinking that the coil A is the primary since all conventional logic would assume this, but it is not. hehehe

The heat sinked components, probably fast acting diodes or zeners go as well to 14. The capacitor 13 may be in series with the AC 10 line. (not sure yet but that can be tested).

The AC10 line leaves the Tin Can and goes (maybe via the capacitor 13) to the bridge rectifier and pulses the coil B real primary. The combined activities of the AC feed to 1-2 and the DC feed back to 3-4 will create some rather havoc conditions inside the AB transformer. In creating this loop, if you can take off just a small excess at a good frequency will provide the output required to the bulbs.

This is working in reverse. 

The diagram only shows the Stage 1 activity. During the week I will integrate the TKc and output to bulbs.

Testing this will be easy.

Have to go to work.

wattsup

PS: Guys if you stick to the practical physicals of the device, each little new discovery will advance this far more then all the theories combined.

sparks

Quote from: verpies on September 24, 2012, 12:17:44 AM
I don't claim that it is impossible - just not that way.
Most likely it's just a matter of "drawing a proper box"....  for example if your accelerated electron hits a nucleus and causes it to fall apart (through some kind of inelastic collision) then the particles liberated from the nucleus might appear to have greater energy than the incoming electron. 
Especially when the initial nucleus' binding energy is not accounted for - "not in the box".

   An electron will and does pass through neutrons all the time with little effect.  Neutrons and protons and electrons can all occupy the same space and not collide at all.  Neutrons can not occupy the same space with other neutrons. Protons can not occupy the same space with other protons.  Electrons are of two types and therefore can occupy the same space but only male and female.  No same  marriages amongst electrons allowed.  Neutrons are difficult to extract from atomic neuclei because they have no response to an electric field.  You can not accelerate a neutron but must accelerate the entire neuclide while ionized.  Upon a fast electric field reversal the proton brakes and reverses and the neutron/neutrons continue on and  laid bare.  The bare ass neutron degenerates into a proton and electron.  The difference in mass between the proton and the electron created is converted into electo-magnetic radiation at full-spectrum wavelengths.  The degeneration of a neutron takes 12 seconds so various neutron slower down mechanisms are used to insure the event doesn't happen outside the reactor core.  To enhance the probablilty of neutron isolation-elements with high numbers of neutrons are used like racking balls for a pool game.  The intitial fast neutron slams into the rack and breaks it.  The individual pool balls after 12 seconds melt into a proton and an electron. What I suggest is that we can see that the original event is due to the electric field reversal.  Spent neuclear fuel rods lying around all over the place and posing a health risk for thousands of years is BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT.  Take the rods cleanemup and vibrate the neutrons out of it until it poses no more health risks than the shit they paint onto glow in the dark emergency exit signs.  You can mix it with some cement and recoat the pyramids and make them into glow in the dark structures to dupe the herds into adoring some inbred royalty also.
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love