Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 159 Guests are viewing this topic.

jbignes5





@ Wattup, Now that is a pretty decent drawing of the stuff behind the coils. But the diode symbols you have drawn are upside down. I have all kinds of this diodes and they all show the symbol the other way. Other then that It looks good. Like I said I had assume it was not bakelite or non metal because when the transformer was moved and the plate touched the large coil he readjusted the transformer and plate to not be touching. Other then that you might be very correct on your drawing. It makes sense.


So why put the dc trough a transformer then? Unless it is pulsing dc it would do little to bias the ac from the inverter.

11 and 12 are most likely heatsinked diodes.

sparks

Quote from: Magluvin on September 23, 2012, 09:06:28 PM
Can you provide any links to this info you are quoting?  The 'grid owners' are cheating the power companies? Like, down the line would there not be any required use comparisons? 

Crazy post Sparks. ;]

Mags

    Forrest you can take an invoice from a power company.  The monopoly got broken-up a number of years ago.  They have to list what you are paying the generator company and the grid owners seperately.  You will be amazed at how much we are paying the meter readers to send us a bill.  These grid owners remind me of the people who owned the railroad tracks right before their greed collapsed it into the fuckedup mess we have today riding the rails.  Eisnenhower fucked them good when he built the interstate highway systems.  Telsa will have his day with these power grid owner pieces of shit soon enough.  The new grid of course is the communication grid but again Tesla has plans for these assholes also just a matter of somebody implementing them.
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

andrea76


grizli

This man claims he managed to replicate Kapanadze

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNyqMIe997s&feature=em-uploademail-new

I dont know french language .. PLEASE translate this whole video to english, very important !!!!!!!!!


Hoppy

Quote from: wattsup on September 24, 2012, 09:58:42 AM
@Zeitmaschine

You are right, the diode plate could be bakelite or other plastic type which means those diode anodes may be isolated on that diode plate. Taking that as a new cue, I had to figure out the logic of having those two diode cathodes with that copper connector. Than came the flash..........

Let me run this by you in terms of logic. What if this whole device works backwards and the diode plate is isolated and is really a full bridge rectifier. The only possible logic to that usage is that the heavy coil is really being used as a primary. This counters all logic since we see the AC feed from the inverter is going to the other coil which is really the secondary.

Are your ready for some mind bending.....

See diagram below......

The inverter output goes to transformer A at 1-2 (which is really the secondary) that precharges the primary side B but the bridge rectifier does not let it go any further back. Then 1-2 becomes line AC 5 that goes to the Tin Can 14.

We are thinking that the coil A is the primary since all conventional logic would assume this, but it is not. hehehe

The heat sinked components, probably fast acting diodes or zeners go as well to 14. The capacitor 13 may be in series with the AC 10 line. (not sure yet but that can be tested).

The AC10 line leaves the Tin Can and goes (maybe via the capacitor 13) to the bridge rectifier and pulses the coil B real primary. The combined activities of the AC feed to 1-2 and the DC feed back to 3-4 will create some rather havoc conditions inside the AB transformer. In creating this loop, if you can take off just a small excess at a good frequency will provide the output required to the bulbs.

This is working in reverse. 

The diagram only shows the Stage 1 activity. During the week I will integrate the TKc and output to bulbs.

Testing this will be easy.

Have to go to work.

wattsup

PS: Guys if you stick to the practical physicals of the device, each little new discovery will advance this far more then all the theories combined.

Interesting idea wattsup and well worth developing. Before I read this, I had posted on the other thread about how one winding of the Dally inverter is 'one leg' down to earth ground and in series with the main coil winding L1 and how this, together with the added induced nano-pulses, could be seen as a means of introducing havoc / chaos into the inverter output transformer. Hopefully, there is a common theme here.

Hoppy