Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[sparks]

No, the slingshot gravity assist manouver around a planet does not work if the planet is not moving.  If it is moving, then the linear momentum gained by the spaceship is equal in magnitude to that lost by the planet. 
Just like bouncing a ball off of a moving train.

  The spacecraft upon approaching the planet in question goes into an orbital manuever where it spirals closer and closer to the surface of the planet.  It increases it's angular momentum and fires a propellant to leave the planet in question tangentially with increased velocity than when it started the orbital manuever.  This tangential exit from the orbit occurs when the tangent is aligned with the next space dimple the spacecraft uses to move along inside the Solarsphere.  The voyager spacecraft is having all sorts of problems in the heliopause as it is losing momentum for some purported unknown reason.  They know exactly why it is slowing down.  Interstellar space is full of plasma and these guys at Nasa know it but continue to play the fools.   I also suggest that space is teeming with lifeforms.  Some of them intelligent and some of them as dumb as a 2 by 4.  You got these lifeforms showing up all the time especially near lightning storms where by god a whole shitload of edible plasma becomes available to these critters.  You have them floating around in the plasmasphere and these unidentified lifeforms don't have to come from lightyears away goldilocks solar systems.  They are the watchers who have watched us carbon critters kill each other off for eons.  They study us because most lifeforms value life unlike the physcopaths we find amongst our lifeforms.

[Neo-X]

Im tired of this, reading forum, thinking of how to make it work, making experiment with failed result. Why is it so hard to make an overunity device? If theres really a God please tell me how can i build one... This is my only hope in life. Please God tell me.

[27Bubba]

@Neo-X

you not alone, keep trying just like anybody else..

[Neo-X]

It hunts me everyday. If this continues, i think im going insane. I regret that i discover overunity. It made my life miserable.

[Zeitmaschine]

I'll take it was exactly how it was designed to be using those types of diodes. Metal it is assumed.

So maybe metal gives Free Energy but bakelite does not.

Anyway the easiest (but not necessarily the truest) match for the TK diodes would be a KD203A.

Hence according to the symbol printed on the diode there is a mistake in my latest (previous) drawing. Plus and minus should be reversed. (Otherwise it will produce negative Free Energy at best )

To get even closer, you have to still “cross the bridge” and conclude that the transformer in the 2004 video cannot be the part where the energy is generated.

Even if the transformer is not the part where the energy is generated, then nevertheless it can be still an essential part that is needed to generate the energy somewhere else. TK talks about »keeping resonance between coils«, now if we can rule out the big coil for that (it is most likely a distraction) then the only remaining part with coils that could keep resonance is this transformer, because there is no room in the tin can for a transformer (or coils) even more heavier (with thicker wire) than this transformer. In addition Kapanadze uses a bank of capacitors. A capacitor is the counterpart of a coil. A transformer comprises such coils.

See diagram below......

I would draw the heat sinks with three wires (does not matter if these parts are useless anyway). If the third wire is black then it would simply not be visible in the poor video. Why should TK use transistors as diodes with two connections only, when he has obviously real 10A diodes at hand?

And then, the B side of the transformer is not one coil but two. This could be essential. Maybe both coils are in use, but each in a different way.

Wikipedia says unlimited energy is easy, all what is needed is an »ideal current source«:

»The internal resistance of an ideal current source is infinite. An independent current source with zero current is identical to an ideal open circuit. The voltage across an ideal current source is completely determined by the circuit it is connected to. When connected to a short circuit, there is zero voltage and thus zero power delivered. When connected to a load resistance, the voltage across the source approaches infinity as the load resistance approaches infinity (an open circuit). Thus, an ideal current source, if such a thing existed in reality, could supply unlimited power and so would represent an unlimited source of energy.«

One more question: Why does a transformer consume less amps (according to MOT experiment on YouTube) if there is a capacitor (or a bank of capacitors) connected in series with the load?

Correct me if I'm wrong: When the primary coil of a transformer is connected to AC voltage then there is a current going through this coil. This current creates a magnetic flux in the core of the transformer. This magnetic flux creates voltage (not current) in the secondary coil. Therefore there is only a low current going through the primary coil. As soon as a load is connected to the secondary coil a current starts flowing through this secondary coil. At the same time a high current starts flowing through the primary coil as well. Why?

Because the current in the secondary coil creates a magnetic flux in the core like the current in the primary coil. But the voltage (and so the current) created in the primary coil by the secondary coil is opposite (or at least out of phase) compared to the initial supply voltage. This is because the magnetic flux created by the secondary coil is created by a current which is created by the magnetic flux that is created by the primary coil, therefore the flux is opposite. If the current in the secondary coil is not created by a load but instead by a second supply voltage (in phase with the first) then there is no opposite magnetic flux and hence there is no high current in neither of the both coils.

Another explanation would go like this: Instead of having an fixed iron core in a transformer with a magnetic flux the transformer has a bar magnet going through both coils. When a current is flowing through the primary coil it pushes the magnet towards the secondary coil. This movement creates a current (if load is connected) in the secondary coil. This current counteracts the movement of the magnet, so the primary coil has to push with more force, hence it draws more amps form the power supply. If the secondary coil is not connected to a load but to an additional power supply in phase with the primary power supply then both coils would move the magnet in the same direction, hence the current in both coils would stay low.

Now what if there were a possibility to change the current in the secondary coil (created by the load) in such a way that for the transformer it looks like as if the current in the secondary coil is not created by the magnetic flux in the core but from a second supply voltage?

A MOT has only one secondary coil. But what when a transformer has two secondary coils? Would it be possible that one coil cancels out the magnetic flux created by the other coil but at the same time providing current nevertheless? Maybe by means of a combination of diodes an capacitors?

The idea: If the secondary coil is a bifilar one then a current going through this coil would conveniently not create any magnetic field, so there would be also no counter flux towards the primary coil. Of course the primary coil would not have created a current/voltage in this bifilar coil in the first place. But what would happen if the secondary bifilar coil were switchable somehow or other? Maybe depending on a shift of the phase of the current going through it?

And BTW, is there now a (self-made) additional coil below the bumpy insulation of the transformer or is it not? Could this coil perhaps be used to counteract the magnetic flux of the secondary coils?

Happy brainstorming ...

PS, almost forgot: Physics 12 June 1 U9L3,5 Lenz's Law, Transformers