Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 42 Guests are viewing this topic.

xenomorphlabs

Quote from: Frederic2k1 on October 21, 2012, 12:12:07 PM

Forgive me my ignorance but is this something new ? Does this implicate that we can move a charge freely once the electric field is established ?


regards  ;)

Nothing new since Faraday laid it out ...

forest

Quote from: xenomorphlabs on October 21, 2012, 12:39:21 PM
Nothing new since Faraday laid it out ...

I have a feeling this is related ... http://www.rastko.rs/rastko/delo/10895

What was the impossible problem around 1860 ??? ?  I think it is again the problem of disproportion between electric force assumed between charges and the small amount of energy possible to obtain in electrostatic like devices like electrostatic motor. If that is the problem Tesla mentioned and he really found solution then it has to be the way....again it brings me the hard question : why electrons in vacuum are moving so fast but inside wire not ? Obvious solution would be the resistance but is it really the only reason ? why inside wire current is lagging and is not related to electron drift while in vacuum tube it seems intact with direct speed of electron particles ?
I have also feeling that Tesla was right and electron can only exists in pure vacuum as particle ....add here Steven Marks discovery about triode amplifiers and grid with mixed currents.

Isn't the overall picture the solution to the holy grail of all electricians, almost alchemical recipe : mix low current high voltage and high current low voltage and get huge power ???

stivep


Quotefrom Wasabi. to jbignes


It's ridiculous how you can plug your aversion to math and your obsession with the electric field into a purely magnetostatic problem.  Also, I am surprised that this time you limited yourself only to personal bashing and skipped the usual hero worship.
Why don't we make a bet that you will stop posting to this thread, once and for all, if the flux density at the disk surface indeed is decreasing with increasing distance (>r1) from the symmetry axis in the Magnetic Spool system mentioned by yfree.I will accept an empirical or theoretical proof to the magnetostatic problem defined in the PDF attachment.Of course, an empirical evidence always trumps a theoretical proof.Our peers can be our judges. The loser leaves this thread permanently.Do you accept?


short comment
Disagree !!
unfair.
It is like if I was wrong than I'm no longer able to contribute to the science..
by that token brilliancy of one born with delay will be rejected as useful to the OU community only by exclusion rule not connected to  the essence of contribution very value.


NONSENSE.!!!


Wesley   


PS. I.m not writing a lot now but thinking twice more.
:)

Zeitmaschine

To all whom it may concern: I'm sure not to be the first one to ponder over the Tesla patent No. 514,168.

A generator provides alternating current. Then this low frequency current is converted to high frequency current by means of two transformers, two capacitors and a rotating spark gap submerged in oil. Isn't there a simpler method to generate high frequency currents?

Then why is this method not named »MEANS FOR CONVERTING LOW FREQUENCY ELECTRIC CURRENTS INTO HIGH FREQUENCY ELECTRIC CURRENTS« or »MEANS FOR GENERATING HIGH FREQUENCY ELECTRIC CURRENTS« but »MEANS FOR GENERATING ELECTRIC CURRENTS«? Actually this device does not generate any electric currents but it converts one into the other, doesn't it?

In the whole patent specification I can't find any hint what the practical purpose of this device could be. Isn't this strange? And what are »connected translating devices«? Which device could need a high frequency current to translate it into something different?

Interestingly the capacitors and the second transformer are submerged in oil to cool them down, the first transformer is not. Could this mean there is less energy flow involved in the input transformer than in the output transformer? ???

Quote from: wattsup on October 20, 2012, 10:27:52 PM
Today I decided to cut my house main water pipe at its entrance point
Everyone should take apart his whole house until Free Energy is found. 8)

In order to get electric current to flow all what is needed is something with a negative charge (lot of electrons), and something with a positive charge (lack of electrons) and then connect them together with a load between. Since the ground is negatively charged what could be the positively charged counterpart? Everything that is not ground? Even the air? So what's the problem? ???

jbignes5

Quote from: Frederic2k1 on October 21, 2012, 12:12:07 PM

Forgive me my ignorance but is this something new ? Does this implicate that we can move a charge freely once the electric field is established ?


regards  ;)


No not freely. It can only be excited then drawn twords the higher potential. But it can be compressed which increases the energy in the process. This increases the charges speed and intensity which motivates additional charges as a vacuum forms. The electric field is only the exciter/attract-er. The Shape of the field from the coil and intensity gradient dictate the direction of flow.