Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[pix]

Perhaps because it is obvious, that the avalanche multiplication of relativistic electrons (or positrons) requires nuclear reactions in which one beta particle causes the release of at least two beta particles.

...and such multiplying beta nuclear reactions do not exist, do they ?

Without them, the number of released betas cannot grow in McFreey 's  scheme .

So, how you explain electrons multiplication during Townsend discharge? It is electrons avalanche reaction. Simple spark discharge.
On the beginning you have a few electrons, at the end electrons constitute current in kA range.
I call it "electron chain reaction", similarily to nuclear chain reaction.
This is a OU right in front of our noses.
Regards,
Pix

[forest]

Electrons multiplication ... hmmm

Thing are not as easy as you think....

Let's read

Here what Tesla said about quenched spark gap and Wein theories.

"Figure 32.

Quenched spark gap. (Tesla at that time pointed out the future of quenching and showed that oscillations can be maintained without a spark being visible to the naked eye between the knobs.) Illustrated in T.C. Martin book, Figs. 135 and 136, p. 211.

     This [Fig. 32] is another improvement in that particular device, which was the weakness of the invention and which I tried to eliminate.  This device incorporated many spark gaps in series.  It had a peculiar feature; namely, through the great number of gaps, I was able, as I have pointed out in my writings, to produce oscillations without even a spark being visible between the knobs.  This device is now known in the art as the "quenched spark gap." Professor Wein has formulated a beautiful theory about it, which I understand has netted him the Nobel prize.  Wein's theories are admirable.  The only trouble is that he has overlooked one very important fact.  It is this: If the apparatus is properly designed and operated, there is no use for the quenched gap, for the oscillations are continuous anyway.
" [Source : http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/nt_on_ac.htm]

but Wilhem Wien was known by his work on heat and radiation. First we see that Tesla state spark gap was used ONLY to make oscilations continous, he didn't declined Wein theories, but simpy stated it was not related to optimal work of his (Tesla) device.

Second what we can read about Wein is also a big surprise !

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1911/wien.html

"In 1898 Wien studied the canal rays discovered by Goldstein and concluded that they were the positive equivalent of the negatively-charged cathode rays. He measured their deviation by magnetic and electric fields and concluded that they are composed of positively-charged particles never heavier than electrons."  (is that mistake in text?)

"In 1900 Wien published a theoretical paper on the possibility of an electromagnetic basis for mechanics. Subsequently he did further work on the canal rays, showing, in 1912, that, if the pressure is not extremely weak, these rays lose and regain, by collision with atoms of residual gas, their electric charge along their course of travel. "

Whoa! I can't be protons or he wrongly measured their weight ?  What is looks like is exactly radiant rays as described in Tesla radiant energy receiver patent.

[pix]

Hi forest,
I know Tesla was about oscillations. But what I am talking about is multiplication phenomena occuring during simple electrical discharge.It is a fact, that during spark discharge we gain electrons in avalanche process. Nuclear chain reaction is the sane but with neutrons.Spark discharge is "electrons chain reaction". One electron  liberated from  cathode metal  becomes ballistic (or relativistic ) in electric field and during acceleration toward anode liberates many other electrons.
It is current amplifier. End of the discharge contain electrons in kA range. Imagine picking up  B field from that discharge, or sending it through the coil. For me- this is a OU.
All what we need is a tiny HV capacitor, charged , just to start this multiplying event.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Townsend_discharge
Regards,
Pix

[forest]

Pix

Are you sure energy is added to circuit from avalanche electrons ? I think it is radiated from spark gap

[pix]

Pix

Are you sure energy is added to circuit from avalanche electrons ? I think it is radiated from spark gap

Shield and tap this radiation. By simple use of CT ,B-field from avalanche current could be tapped. Also, avalanche electrons go to the load, for example coil.
This is an example:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2011/0188278.html
Regards,
Pix