Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 180 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on December 23, 2012, 08:45:01 PM
Why should a device of small size (although it does actually not look that small) not work, but a bigger device does? What could be the physical reason for this?
For example the confinement of charged particles (not conduction electrons) inside solid matter requires higher magnetic flux density for smaller radii (see the attached photo of electrons in gas being confined to a circle by a magnetic field).
Also, smaller radii lead to higher resonance frequencies and higher frequencies incur higher penalty from the skin-effect in conductive materials, possibly bringing the device below the break-even point (unity).

The above statements are universally true but not necessarily applicable to TK's devices since one of those devices has been shown by Wattsup as powered externally via a hand-held cable.

verpies

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on December 23, 2012, 08:45:01 PM
The inverter creates just an additional loss of the battery's scarce energy and takes the place for more (or bigger) batteries. Hence it would be more efficient to fake this with 8 (smaller) 12V batteries, wouldn't it?
It would. That fat lamp would easily hold more than 8 of such batteries.
The only disadvantage of this "solution" would be its DC output (easily discovered by plain multimeters) but the lightbulb would not "care".

forest

Farmhand
OU is nothing more but consummation of external energy. Coal burner is OU if you don't have to dig for or buy coal.  :P

What we are looking for is OU which consume external force field. Interesting  that every attempt to get it in large commercial scale require a single place when large amount of energy is tapped which makes situation unstable and disaster occur (nature tries to balance huge displacement). Tesla knew something about it when he experimented in Colorado Springs and there are articles describing strange effect in envinronment.
Imho the only way is to tap energy in small  amounts evenly distributed over the Earth. Something quite opposite to the demands of those who rule the world.



cheappower2012

Zeitmaschine,
Its hard to imagine someone that cares about nobody,
SM cares about no one or if there suffering,he ran a con game for years.
Gave nothing to investors ripped them off,If you could make a small
device then it could be placed in part of
another device to power it,cell phones,small electronics,it appeals to investor greed
you corner the market.The fake tpu's are only seen once in this investor video and never again.
why should a big device work and  a small one not, It requires a start up circuit,the smaller devices lack this,
so are fake,
also SM did not fully understand how the tpu works,so could not make a real small tpu.
My full analysis is not yet complete on the tpu,I took time off to examine the TK device
to see if its related to the tpu,it is.I believed at first it was a hoax,untill the other TK video's showed up.
The mystery of the TK device was ac output and much higher output than the tpu,the output of the tpu
is higher voltage dc.You are forgeting the time,in 1996 a lot of modern battery technology did not exist or was very expensive
this is why SM did it in this way.I've studied SM for a while,I understand how he thinks,its all about faking
you out in clever ways,then laugh at you.Is there a connecting principle that all real world free energy devices use,correct guess,all real world
free energy devices are energy converters,converting an unknown energy source into electrical energy.
The purpose of showing the two devices could easly be faked was to remove them
from the list of working tpu's to find a common link between the real tpu's,this is to understand how this device works,
all real tpu's have common things.
Sm is very good at hiding things so the tpu is as hard to figure out as is TK's device.
The tpu device is in some ways more complex a device than the TK device and you could not
simply stumble into it,it took SM years to make it,it takes years of experiments to just half ass understand
how it works.

magneto_DC

Quote from: FreeEnergyInfo on December 23, 2012, 04:08:50 AM
MUSTAFA FREE ENERGY 2.5 KW


Hi FreeEnergyInfo,

may I ask You some questions, please.

1. The name of the condensor in the middle is C pl3 ? The capacity of it is C pl3 = 60 ยต Farad? It is for obtaining resonance in the middle circuit?

2. R H is a incandescent lamp? The resistence is ~ 1000 Ohm? The wattage is ~ 50 Watt?

3. On the right side is a Diode? How spell the three letters TMP? What is the specification of TMP?

Thank You and
more question will follow.

magneto_DC