Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[gyulasun]

Hi Nick,

The reducement of the current draw may have been caused by

--going up in frequency from 7.5 kHz to 10 kHz (coils inductive reactance in the oscillator core increased)

--changing the original bias resistors to a better bias circuit see this schematic what I mean:

http://www.personal.psu.edu/sdb229/plasma%20ball%20power%20supply.html 

in the schematic you can see two resistors as a voltage divider to the base of the power transistor, they are 220 Ohm and 20 Ohm.  They load the 25V supply by a current of 25/240=0.1 Amper, without the transistor. of course this is not a problem in that circuit because it is driven from the mains supply but I would not use that divider in my circuit if it is run from a battery and input power must be minimized.  (Of course I am aware of the fact that in such oscillators the base must be driven with a low impedance and the simplest solution is using resistive dividers indeed. I would use a second transistor as an emitter follower to drive the base, maybe known as a Darlington connection.)  How the bias is the most economical power draw-wise always depends on the circuit in question of course.

You wrote: 
"The meters may not be showing correct readings, but on my set up I'm using a 12v 500mA wall adapter, so I know that the draw is not more than that, and may even be less than that."

Well, it would be better to check the actual current draw any time it is needed because the transformer in the wall adapter can be 'abused' a little by taking out say 600mA occasionally and you would not know about it unless you check it.

Thanks for the video link, nice setup using the 4 ferrite bead coil. 

rgds,  Gyula

[Zeitmaschine]

It would be important to show the video where this device is being shown as a fake.
Otherwise, we may all be barking up the wrong tree. 

Fake or not, this is going in circles: Here is an interesting video, where a tiny 9 V battery powers 95 W bulb

So why not trying something very new and special:

a) Experiment with a parametric oscillator. This effect is different from regular resonance.
b) Use a Faraday cage. Even if there is no positive effect, using one will not hurt anything.
c) Take a close look at the Stepanov transformer. It works on the same principle like the Kapanadze device, but without high frequency and/or high voltage.

But if nothing of this helps then go and watch Groundhog Day for relaxation.

[jbignes5]

  Gyulasun:
   Reducing the draw to 110mA is quite impressive. This may be due or helped by the string of capacitors that he is using. I suspect that the coil is nothing too elaborate, nor is the rest of his circuit. He may possibly using ferrite of some form wrapped inside of the pvc pipe, as his coil is small compared to what others have made.
  Lighting a 40 watt incandescent is not that difficult. But, using only 110mA to do so, is.
The meters may not be showing correct readings, but on my set up I'm using a 12v 500mA wall adapter, so I know that the draw is not more than that, and may even be less than that.

  If you have not seen it yet, here is one of my videos lighting a 60 watt, not 40 watt like his, on a Joule Ringer circuit. If connected to solar panels, and 12v battery, it is free energy.  In any case, it's a step in the right direction, at least it has been for me, as I can light my whole living area now off of just one Cfl bulb now running on 500 mA.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chEwqvtJUOA&NR=1

  Those that have tried to replicate the Daly type of device need to try it outside, with the two ground connections laying on the ground, not in the air, as some have shown.
Maybe trying it with two different types of grounds, like copper, and iron, as the grounding rods, also.

  To think that all of these circuits are fakes, is not going to get us anywhere.
No one has proved how they are faked, by replicating the exact same circuit.
Why would all of these guys be making fakes, there's no money in that.
We need to get on with it, there's too many of these guys having some luck, why can't we?
  Most replications that are showing running on NO battery, are using two earth grounds, so I doubt that this is just a coinsedence.

There is a ton of experiments in the crystal battery section that show the virtues of using two different metals IE aluminum (radiator) and copper or iron pipes to get a battery or diode like effect. This would be additive to the ground loop current that can become so strong that it could heat up the metals used in the ground.


I agree that a lot of hot air is thrown around about how they are faked and to tell you the truth the only reason is to put doubt into people's minds so they do not try these methods and succeed. The main problem I can see with these experiments is the ground metals are not inspected afterwards to see the condition of the elements like a galvanic response to the aluminum which would be the sacrificial element.


But I have to state that in later experiments by TK he shows systems that do not rely on the grounds only a battery is used to kick off the effect and once going good will cycle very easily without the battery.


We need to focus and not let these opinions dictate our direction of experimentation. It's ok to have an opinion about things but it should not dictate your experiments and observations of those experiments. Only data will tell us the truth. Once I get my lab up and running I will be showing true experiments that are clear and opinion less. Just the facts mam.

The Tesla oscillator is something I am gonna use to excite the setup and maybe use this difference in potentials of the ground to get real current.

If the earth is on e plate of a capacitor then creating an excitation of that plate will draw current from the other plate. Very simple.

[NickZ]

   I looked at the Stepanov's videos, but could not understand a word of it. 
Maybe someone can explain what is going on...
   
   The circuits that I'm working on are similar to the parametric oscillator, as many of the circuits, that are pulse circuits. Even Dr. Stiffler has mentioned that they have something in common to his circuits. He was able to light 48 leds or so, with no input from a battery, power supply, signal generator, etz...  I see several similarities to the Docs circuit tuning methods and the Westley team efforts.
  Its the working principal that we need to get down, so starting small is ok, for now.
  This is not a waist of time, at least not for me, as I have nothing but time.
  There seams to be one thing in common to all the Kapanadze type circuits, that they all need some source of energy to start them off, then must have to feed back onto itself to be self-running. No feed-back circuit, no self runner. Yes? No???

  Groundhogs day movie, well... no groundhogs here, to be entertained by watching.
  I'll watch the movie, though, later.  Thanks for the suggestions.

[andrea76]

new video of TK.can someone translate please??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1l6TGpe0uKs