Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

Does this matter? I can't see a typical Tesla coil on Kapanadze's table anyway.
If we want to tap the Earth's electric field then it makes sense to use an electronic component that can store an electric field. That would be a capacitor. To get a continuous flow of energy we then need a pumping effect. That's why the capacitor should be in resonance with a coil. So the capacitor is like Tesla's under water tank. The electric field (the water) flows in from the environment and is then converted into a magnetic field (by means of the coil), this magnetic field provides the output energy. At the same time the surrounding electric field can replenish the capacitor.

So I think the Kapanadze device is a resonant circuit build with a three-plate capacitor - which should fit secretly in a small metal can. I'm not even sure if the metal can is not part of that capacitor.

Interesting btw: Three Plate Capacitor

Yes it matters. It's like comparing DC to AC.


I wholly agree with your assessment that the 3 plate capacitor is in fact the KEY here. But might I make a change to your capacitor diagram?

The bottom connection is the ground or virtual ground connector. The c3 plate pair is the normal capacitance and the c1 and c2 parts are where the ground energy can come into the capacitor.


Might I also quote Tesla from the Colorado notes:

" In order to produce the greatest possible movement of electricity through a region of the earth in accordance with the plan involving use of a single terminal oscillator, as here experimented with, it is desirable to obtain in some way a large capacity on the free terminal. This is connected with difficulty as spheres get to be too large with moderate tensions and when the tensions go into the millions, streamers can not be easily overcome. The streamers involve loss of pressure just as leaks would on a water pipe which is closed at one end. Large capacity is obtainable in a number of ways of which some are:

1) a coil wound for maximum capacity (internal). The turns are so disposed that between the adjacent turns of layers there exists a great difference of potential, as much as the insulation can stand."

The coil he mentions is the bifilar coil!

The single terminal oscillator is a grounded Lodge coil with the upper terminal connected to a separate coil to increase the pressure or voltage of the free terminal. This coil can be the bifilar coil from what I am getting.

"As has been stated on a previous occasion in connection with this subject, to enable a considerable rise of pressure to take place in a circuit, the same must be tolerably free from inductive influences of other circuits. It follows from this that, although with a secondary in loose connection with a primary a very high pressure is obtainable, yet the pressure will never be as high as when an "extra coil" not in inductive connection with the primary is employed to raise the pressure, because the secondary always reacts upon the primary thus dampening the vibration, while the "extra coil" does not react in such a manner, the rise of pressure being simply due to the factor pL/R."

  The single terminal oscillator is shown in the second attached picture below, right hand of the picture.

[Zeitmaschine]

This means when we charge C1 then C2 gets a charge for free from the environment. And in case of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter that would mean circuit C2 (receiver) gets its charge not from C1 (transmitter) but also for free from the environment but only when in resonance with circuit C1. On the other hand, why then has Tesla it not named Magnifying Receiver? It is the receiver that magnifies (gets charge for free) not the transmitter.

Very strange. Correct me if I'm wrong.

[Cap-Z-ro]

"On the other hand, why then has Tesla it not named Magnifying Receiver? "



Could it be that he was simply disguising the nature of it...for obvious reasons ?

Regards...

[jbignes5]

This means when we charge C1 then C2 gets a charge for free from the environment. And in case of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter that would mean circuit C2 (receiver) gets its charge not from C1 (transmitter) but also for free from the environment but only when in resonance with circuit C1. On the other hand, why then has Tesla it not named Magnifying Receiver? It is the receiver that magnifies (gets charge for free) not the transmitter.

Very strange. Correct me if I'm wrong.

The magnification comes from the capacitor in the oscillating circuit. This is due to the resonant rise of the oscillator and nothing more. Connecting the secondary to the ground allows you to pump the ground into the secondary increasing the current of the secondary. The capacitance is the Magnifier from what I am getting....


"The following arrangement was found particularly efficient in applying the method of magnifying the effects of feeble disturbances by means of a condenser."

The Receiver does the same.

The magnifying effect was to turn current into extreme potentials. The extra current from the ground connection was used to increase the voltage potential when the extra coil was used. This allowed the transmission of energy through any medium to be loss-less in a sense. You wouldn't loose energy to heat and magnetic loops. The conversion also entails the ground to pull more current into the receiver to be used as a gain mechanism, plus conversion of the electric potential into whatever you needed for current.

There were two ways to do this. Through the air and through the earth! The earth having a better results. Tesla's experiments went the route of earth transmissions and the air being the ground. The earth being round would be like the top load of a "Tesla coil" The field radiating out into space Longitudinally. Meaning given a certain potential the field would go so far. Varying this field around the ball of earth would mean instant results everywhere around the earth. Lets say you had detectors at every 1000 feet above the level of the earth. Everywhere around the earth that there is a detector they would detect at 1k increments everywhere around our globe. That fits Tesla's analogy of the ball of rubber and what happens when you pump the ball. Any movement will be detected all the way around the globe.

[Zeitmaschine]

This allowed the transmission of energy through any medium to be loss-less in a sense.

But loss-less is not magnifying. At least in my understanding.

Actually, what happens if there are two (or more) receivers? If the load connected to one receiver consumes all the energy coming from that one transmitter, then what's left for all the other receivers? What if the load on one receiver creates a short circuit? Will it blow the fuse on the transmitter through thin air?

Transmitting energy loss-less through the air is a very strange thing when examined closely.