Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[zcsaba77]

Also, as usual, the brightness of the bulbs is not quantified and not related to Watts in any meaningful manner.

Hi

I agree with verpies in this 'different power consumption on same brightness/bulb' thema, I think (believe) HF flow just on surface the wolfram wire in bulb and shine same like on normal grid

regards zcsaba77

[andrea76]

this patent is inserted in the "documents considerer to be relevant" in the kapanadze patent:
http://www.google.ru/patents/US20030038612


we have to think...

[Acca]

 Sergey.... Американцы не очень умный на русском языке, это делает их путают.

Я не предоставляют больше магнитной теории к ним, поскольку они просто слишком тупы, чтобы понять. Это слишком много усилий, чтобы воспитать настоящих американцев. Acca ..

Римская видео дубликатор ниже, также с сегодняшнего д

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5aajLyTHjI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEa_B-zYObc




Ниже приведены старые видео, что Роман удалил из своего канала некоторое время назад ..


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5xNgfEujZA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyL_9nvmSs4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Eh_k6Sv_T8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsNWRWxFfSc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTUIgldL09U

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z__CvfVV9Eo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loxbVZuHMWs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KXL_tnxzgM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0EFecIAfOY[/font]

[Zeitmaschine]

Thinking ...

Who has considered that patent as relevant? Kapanadze himself? Or rather the patent attorney who had no idea how the Kapanadze device really works?

I would rather consider as relevant the following sentence written by Nikola Tesla: A characteristic feature of the engine was that the work-performing piston was not connected with anything else, but was perfectly free to vibrate at an enormous rate.

A »work-performing piston« translates to »pumping action«, »vibrate at an enormous rate« translates to »high frequency« and »not connected with anything else« translates to »not much energy needed in order to vibrate«. That all would fit an oscillator that opens and closes electronically a Faraday cage. The latter translates vice versa to »placing in the lake a tank«.

Hence, did Tesla really ever built such a mechanical oscillator? How can a mechanical piston do work while not being connected with anything? Tesla was a man of electricity. Why should he waste his time with such a pure mechanical machinery? Or did he use this description just as a metaphor to disguise his real invention, namely the fuelless electric generator?

Keep thinking ...

[captainkt]

@Zeit, The transformer with possible split core and 3rd winding does not need thick wires as the inverter is only 400watts feeding the primary,also the possible 3rd winding under paper and over the secondary looks very thick to me .
Regards
Keith