Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[forest]

Thats OK, I have been known to be a little cryptic my own self from time to time.

Further to your point though, those people who so jealously guard their discoveries tightly until death do not realize that they would have the whole world owing them a comfortable life if they were to freely release their findings.

They would be treated like royalty where ever they traveled...all expenses paid of course.

Regards...

Ha! That's unnecessary!    I bet most of them do not want to move from the place they live. They want to work hard but be just heard and supported. Look for Tariel Kapanadze for example, he invented so many useful devices without a scope , much more then anybody who can buy new scope model each month. Yet , I think nobody proposed to him : I will give you nice scope and teach you how to use it so you may develop better , safer invention. I don't get all this situation around the world...I see plenty valuable inventors having free energy devices, yet in road of giving it to the people something is failing every time 

[stivep]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hVMPRLHpKQ&feature=youtu.be


Wesleys News video#1 of Ruslan Kalabuhov Free Energy





Wesley

[Jeg]

correct
it ends up with what Steven Mark said, what Tesla mentioned... you can have inside circuit any kind of currents flowing - each related only to his own power supply... got it !?? I already explained it in 2009 but on another forum...you cannot do work using electricity in open circuit and you cannot "pseudo-connect" to other source potential no matter how big difference in positive or negative range you expect... that's the missing factor, don't expect it to work if you don't know the return path, if you don't see the whole closed circuit... just think about it

I feel that you have a point but i don't get it! Do you consider that our electric-magnetic circuits being float in this big tank of energy are different systems between each other with no in and out paths? We are talking about the same quality of energy in and out of our circuits. what flows in the wire is the same to what flows outside of it. Give positive (current) and you take voltage. Give negative (voltage) and you take current. I think that is all. And if it isn't like that, at least it works for me as a circuit design consideration. When we use positive we spend current to the environment. When we use the negative side, current flows in.

A two ground or a ground and aerial system are the 'in' and 'out' paths. Unidirectional pulses and diodes are necessary. In the same wire you can not have voltage and current flowing to one direction at the same time. This is a conflict that makes the ground useless. Output points with different phases have to have different grounds or else the pump can not work efficiently.

[captainkt]

@jeg, thanks for reply, so a simple diagram should explain what everyone is trying to acheive ? nearly all experimenters have dozens of coils and transformers and components that just need to be connected in the correct order. Once the order is known then a few hours and all should work,after all we are only talking about a handful of parts.


Regards
Keith

[Jeg]

@jeg, thanks for reply, so a simple diagram should explain what everyone is trying to acheive ? nearly all experimenters have dozens of coils and transformers and components that just need to be connected in the correct order. Once the order is known then a few hours and all should work,after all we are only talking about a handful of parts.


Regards
Keith

Captain Keith

I am not an OU expert. I am just trying to find a right way of thinking. In fact I still pay huge bills for electricity to energy companies as the most of us here!
Many drawings in the net like don Smith's Accula's and so many others. Did you give them a try?
Jeg