Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Hoppy · February 19, 2016, 08:12:23 AM

Quote from: cheappower2012 on February 19, 2016, 07:51:04 AM
Zeitmaschine
I'm not a big fan of Tesla,he was a great man but didn't invent free energy
devices.That cable appears to be the connection to the buried radiator.
As to no hidden cable heres wattsup theory the bearded man sticks part
of the black cable ,its two cables,one part is up hes sleeve,down hes pants
to hes shoes,then he steps on the cable on the ground a hot connection.
There is a part on the video where the black ground cable is connected to the radiator ground and the lamps are still lite,the radiator is not a good ground like the faucet so shouldn't work,however a skeptic could say that it doesn't go to the radiator but a good ground.I would think with all the cable stuffing in hes clothing someone would have noticed,ha ha
Because you can not be sure Tariels devices are 100% real ,no one is going to kill him.

Cheappower,

I'm not sure that Wattsup has it quite right, as I think that both the supply wires may have been taken into the device on a two-core cable, thus my call for a clearer shot of the cable as it enters the coil. Logically, why would TK only hide the 'hot' wire when he can avoid the need for a poor earth return but at the same time delight his audience by showing that his device can still operate using a crappy radiator earth, which as you correctly suggest should not work. That is not to say that the earth cable was totally innefective, as it might have been assisting the power return, thus the fluctuating lamp brightness and intermittent operation at times.

Zeitmaschine · February 19, 2016, 08:20:05 AM

Quote from: Hoppy on February 19, 2016, 07:43:00 AM
No - no way! Wrong shot. We all know that the earth cable is a multi-stranded welding type cable.

Then we know something wrong. Correct shot. The black (split end) ground cable leading to the green box was removed from the faucet and is now being connected to the thin white wire leading to the buried radiator. I can't see anything multi-stranded here.

Hoppy · February 19, 2016, 08:27:02 AM

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on February 19, 2016, 08:20:05 AM
Then we know something wrong. Correct shot. The black (split end) ground cable leading to the green box was removed from the faucet and is now being connected to the thin white wire leading to the buried radiator. I can't see anything multi-stranded here.

That cable is a multi-stranded (flexible) welding type cable. See my previous post about the earth cable not necessarily being needed as a return conductor.

wattsup · February 19, 2016, 09:12:45 AM

Yes, yes, yes, the cable going to the pipe is a fat one. But the cable going from the BG to the TKC is a dual conductor, then from inside the TKC to poke out the far end again as a single bundle. That's where the illusion is. You see a single bundle on the pipe and out the TKC so you "think" the single bundle continues throughout the total cabling. Set up the illusion and roll with it. When all the physical mannerisms of the people involved link perfectly well with the faking method, the odds of a fake just go up in spades. You cannot have that many coincidences that can then be ignored.

The question is simple. Can the Green Box video be faked? If yes, then the video cannot be considered irrevocable. If no, then the video has more validity. So my question is, can the Green Box video demonstration be faked or not? Being smart does not mean you have OU, it just means you have creative ways of demonstrating what OU should look like in a demo but in no way can confirm any veracity of OU.

So again, you can spend 1000 more pages grabbing at straws but in the end, you will wind up exactly at the point you are at right now.

When we have OU in our hands for ourselves, we should make a point to show SM and TK how it's really done, not the other way around. This is the position OUers need to take in order to take their power back from all these irrational distractions because in the end, that's all they are. Personally, after all the time we have all spent on these two shmucks, it pains me to say this, but in order to save others the same fate so others can start this quest with fresh minds, uncluttered and open for the future, it is our responsibility to put things into their real perspectives.

wattsup

PS: If you stop painting me like an MIB and actually read what I am saying, you will actually realize that sometimes "naysaying" has its place and it is the responsibility of any true OUer to do so when warranted. But this is not exclusive to OU works, demos, builders. Our Standard EE method is also chock full of "wrongities" (wanted to invent a new word - hahaha) and if you really want to know, once you understand these, working towards OU will be much more productive.

Zeitmaschine · February 19, 2016, 09:24:40 AM

That Kapanadze ground cable is unipolar (in contrast to multipolar), thus it is NOT suitable for a hidden hot wire. Maybe that phraseology makes it more clear.

Quote from: wattsup on February 19, 2016, 09:12:45 AM
Yes, yes, yes, the cable going to the pipe is a fat one. But the cable going from the BG to the TKC is a dual conductor, then from inside the TKC to poke out the far end again as a single bundle.

Oh yes! That means in addition to the hidden wire in the man's sleeve moreover the ground cable is stitched together of two different types of cables and no one noticed this - but in the blurry video we can see it clearly. Are you serious?