Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[dllabarre]

Nobody is listening!

Just test it the way I told you by cutting in the place described !

What did you see when you tried this on your Kapagen?

Don

[forest]

nevermind

[void109]

Just want to make sure you see JLN's new video, Luxmeter ~ output power measurement.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Es0F9MaPzC0&playnext_from=TL&videos=1VEGV470fB4&feature=feedu

pin: 172W
pout: 989W

[xenomorphlabs]

Well then hopefully his next step is to attempt to close the loop.
Supposed that his input measurement is reliable, this is at least
a brilliant method to increase the light efficiency of lamps which can save
power for all those that use lamps alot and want to get more incandescence
out of them !

Tesla however noted this:

Colorado Springs Notes page 349

But i believe that the resistance of the lamps when operated by currents of such extreme frequencies is MUCH smaller than the measured resistance according to the usual methods.
The currents, namely, when produced in such ways as these here employed, have very high maximum values and the carbon is brought periodically to a much higher temperature than when operated with steady currents or currents of ordinary frequencies. I have observed this repeatedly.

Furthermore such currents as these here are used some part of the discharge also passes through the rarefied gas in the bulb and there is a corresponding diminution of the effectives resistance of the lamp on this account.
In fact, i think that it is chiefly owing to this that the resistance becomes very small, it being the fact that such currents pass with the greatest freedom through the rarefied gas particularly when it is maintained at a high temperature, as in the case considered here.
The heating of the gas has the effect of increasing the incadescence of the carbon and it is well demonstrated that an incandescent lamp, takes for a given luminosity, less energy when operated with currents of such high frequencies.

If he is right then the lamps have a much smaller resistance than being
calculated for, thereby also reducing the actual consumed power.
One has to keep in mind that the lamps in the Kapagen are being operated in an uncoventional fashion with high frequency currents.

Closing the loop will show ...

[JuJu]

finnaly some kind of evidence...

but yet, dont prove OU, this method of driving lamps is so efficient that will maybe make seem the brightness will be at full power, but not at is rated power.

i suggest JNaudin make the same test but compare the lux meter values of the load from the grid, with the luxmeter values drived only with the MOT with same input power, and then with the kapagen so we will see whats the difference between them.
and also if the SG/TC are doing some magic here,

i will only believe when he shows amp draw and voltage in the load, i hope, in a near future!

@xeno, before he loops the system he must know what values of output are involded here, and the frequency also, so he can correct the frequency to 50Hz and then divide the energy needed to sustain the device from the energy in exess and send only that amount to the load!

i continue to believe that this luxmeter test is only a "mirage"... it only read brightness, not real power passing the lamp!

Well then hopefully his next step is to attempt to close the loop.
Supposed that his input measurement is reliable, this is at least
a brilliant method to increase the light efficiency of lamps which can save
power for all those that use lamps alot and want to get more incandescence
out of them !

Tesla however noted this:

If he is right then the lamps have a much smaller resistance than being
calculated for, thereby also reducing the actual consumed power.
One has to keep in mind that the lamps in the Kapagen are being operated in an uncoventional fashion with high frequency currents.

Closing the loop will show ...