Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 624 Guests are viewing this topic.

cosmoLV

Quote from: core on January 12, 2011, 07:53:48 PM

What do you mean by 'Everything'?

BTW - On the Russian site it was mentioned that Tariel was hospitalized and was receiving a blood transfusion. I got that from Google translate.

Is it true? and if so how is he doing?

Respectfully,


Core

That's true
Keep your chakras opened :)

TheCell

Quote from: exnihiloest on January 13, 2011, 04:34:12 AM
Again and again the same errors.

In the hypothesis of the linear case, i.e when the circuit parameters such as permeability or magnetic domains are not modified by fields, fields superpose, they simply add (vectorially), and only a change of field strength can be recovered by a coil.

Two errors are linked to the ignorance of this fact.

1) If permanent magnets are static, their presence in a magnetic circuit with coils plays no role for the dynamical functioning. It is the reason why the MEG failed.
And if they move, then Lenz law applies to the coils, an opposite field is created and it is the mechanical work to move the permanent magnets against this "counter-field", that provides the energy.

Other example: when a field from a powering coil nullifies the magnetic field from a permanent magnet in a region where there is a probe coil, and we interrupt the current in the powering coil, it is often said that the field from the permanent magnet "rebuilds", and the probe coil can recover a signal and energy provided by the permanent magnet. It is false. The energy is not coming from the permanent magnet "rebuilding the field" but from the collapse of the field from the powering coil, that superposed to the permanent magnet field. One can remove the permanent magnet, there will be no difference from the viewpoint of the coil (always presumed the linear case).
...
And we are far from Kapanaze's device.

Another member stated :
All free energy devices convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass.
________________________________________________
My opinion (if we leave the linear case)
If it is somehow possible to change an element from one isotope to another it seems to me logical that you can get energy out of it.
Because several patents exist working on that way you described , I assume that they cannot be all false claims.

the kunel patent, the way richard willis devices work , the Michel Meyer patent.

dole

Quote from: penno64 on January 13, 2011, 05:28:54 AM

Where has DOLE gone.


Thank you for asking, It would be much easier just to publish what I do but I still have difficulties to solve many problems, beside can you imagine a embarrassment if it not do what should suppose. I am sorry for writing in the BS way but I really do not know how to express myself better for now. It will be on a youtube some day.
Here is what I start to explore:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbtT_Lc2yXk

As you see the guy do not care about the BEMF, I am now able to utilize the BEMF to, so next to do is not destroy a dipole, but rather preserve and conserve the energy gain. So, at the end everything depends on condensers/wire capacity, and how much you can store and dissipate in opposed storage through the load (Tesla 4 switch). This is highly nonlinear and I suppose Tariel found very smart way to a self-adjustment, otherwise it overload or loss the gain.
We should think about avalanche pendulum which never swings upwards.
If we start from some potential energy and go to the point of a maximum kinetic energy, we may convert / derivate from mass and gravity some appropriate small energy and store then as a potential energy. At that point of the maximum kinetic energy we dissipate the stored potential energy as a kinetic kick, adding it to the this natural kinetic maximum and derivate new portion for next bigger kick, So then we repeat again and again and again (pulsing), not from the source but from the gain.
It is fits very well what Tesla does, Edwin G., SM, even Moray, we only need a potential difference to start the oscillation, of course we must take care of the charge frequency and natural swing frequency and nonlinear kick time (resonance in the resonance) rest depend on the capacity storage. Now you can imagine what charge Tesla tried to swing.  Probably he does :)
Huff bla bla bla, better to work and be quiet, anyway CosmoLV promised solution before first summer beer on the beach so we do not have to worry.

At least “They” allow to teach this at schools to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3eI4SVDyME&feature=related
Take a time and see, if not at least last 10min

And of course for those who think differently
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8ZHQQUusGo&feature=related


Ps.
The quieter you become the more you are able to hear…
(Some may know where this is written some may not :))

d.