Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[LtBolo]

Wow Lt. that's a very rare outburst from you 

Yeah, sorry.

Anybody can be a skeptic and pull people down. It takes a person of vision and faith to see what others do not, and to tolerate abuse while working towards a difficult goal.

I've managed to make a significant amount of money doing what others claimed would fail, and in doing so, I've created many jobs for other people. Over the years, I have come to have little patience for those whose sole purpose in life is to impede the progress of others or criticize their beliefs.

[core]

   Does it get more compelling, or are you lead to believe it gets more compelling? Always question your sources and avoid making the same mistake twice.

   I am really starting to believe that open forums really have the opposite effect on creativity and inventiveness. After over 20 years of research, I see Big Oil has always won and this is thanks to the money it pumps into the system (held together by people). I guess we were probably better off without all this back in the early 80s when the only source of shared info was mouth to mouth and posted bulletins on campus boards. Even then it was hard to filter bullshit from reality. Control the source of information with enough emphasis, manipulate it, and you have a flock of sheep following you. Deja vu?

Hmmm...  This is not your first comment that you made regarding this. Clearly friend you and I come from different walks of life. Allow me to explain, I would venture a guess that the majority of people on these 'free energy' sites are individuals that are in the electronics field or electronics is a 'major' hobby for them. Clearly there are some brilliant minds here and on other forums.  How many people on this thread can say they have been in the HVAC/R (Heating, Ventilation, Air-conditioning/Refrigeration) field for  twenty years? ......I think I stand alone here. Back when I was an instructor I would tell my students that HVAC/R can be summed up in one short sentence. 'It's simple, we just need to manipulate the environment'.  If we can do that then we can transfer it from point 'A' to point 'B'. That's it, it's as simple as that. Now the only way you can do that is to have a substance (refrigerant) that can 'trick' the local environment into following the basic laws of nature.

  Back in Sept. or Oct. I made a comment, and to paraphrase myself 'If you think your going to stumble upon some magical coil arrangement and get free energy your fooling yourself'. I stand by those words. With all the educated people on these forums how is it that this circuit arrangement is so elusive? What does this say about there knowledge? Can it be possible that they are missing a key element in there design such as incorporating a substance to manipulate the environment? What is it that TK knows? Do you think other people know electronics better then TK? If so why can't they build a free energy unit? ..........Do you see how there is something important missing? and it most likely has nothing to do with the right number of transistors or transformers.

  If you believe CosmoLV the 7Kw unit can be had for about $50. to $90. U.S. dollars. That's not a heck of a lot of money. Actually that's about the price of a 250' roll of stranded 14 gauge wire. The bottom line is that it has to be a simple circuit that interacts with the environment. The only way to interact with the environment is to manipulate a part of it. Also we need a closed system so we do not lose our substance. The substance we use must be able to 'absorb' energy then 'reject' energy. Of course the amount of energy required to run the process has to be less then what we can recover.

  So the air we breathe is a gas in a 'super heated' state. By volume it contains 78% nitrogen 20.9% oxygen 1% argon and the remainder is misc crap. One of those two major gases we have to manipulate via an electric circuit take your pick. (That's my belief) 
  I ask you, with all respect, for the last 20 years could it be possible that your missing link could be something that is 'far fetched'?
   
Respectfully,

Core 

[khabe]

In Russian forum there is topic: Testings (experiences) by invention of Kapanadze  (ОпыÑ,Ñ‹ tiger2007 по изобреÑ,ению Т. Капанадзе),
http://www.001-lab.com/001lab/index.php?topic=1056.msg25782#msg25782  tiger2007 shows his experiment where he is declares getting 90% free energy from simple generator http://www.youtube.com/user/tiger2007ify ,
Transformer wound on to ferrite core (from TV CRT line sway),
Look at how does he carry on with measurings 
Scheme:   Power Supply -> box wheres variable resistors -> GENERATOR -> 12V/40W lamp,
He is showing on the Oscilloscope generated peaks and he is drawing on the screen these areas what he declares as free energy he is getting.
Multimeter shows current 1.09...1.10 A ,
Also he is showing small LC filter between generator and Multimeter - small coil and capacitor.
Then he makes a new scheme:
Power Supply ->  box wheres variable resistors  -> 12V/40W lamp,
He is showing the brightness of lamp when current is regulated via box wheres variable resistors to 1.09 A - then lamp just arduously glows.
Then he is trying to get visually the same  brightness of lamp, he does it via box wheres variable resistors - when appr. the same  brightness, then current is 1.92 A ... he declares that this is proofing this device makes 90% free energy ... "coefficient of economy is 0.9" he declares.
O.K. 
But about this kind of measurements ... oh dear
Look at power supply when he turns it ON, what is doing the left Meter?  Is it Ampmeter?
What is Voltage   We do not see Voltage what comes out from Power Supply as well as we do not see Voltage after this "box wheres variable resistors".
Why he does not measure the current direct from power supply? Why after this "box wheres variable resistors" 
When first measuring, Generator ON and current is 1.09 A, he declares he is measuring DC current - is this LC filter adequate for 
What kind of Multimeter this is? Is it true rms or just multimeter 
cheers,
khabe

[iceweller]

   Core, I guess my statement was misinterpreted as I see it the way you do. What I meant to say is that, with all the communication going on and the technology supposedly "helping" us making the world a smaller place (but more controllable), the most important discoveries have come from lone individuals who tend to become (willingly or not) even more isolated. So my question is, do these open forums really help one finding the correct path to the solution (I am referring to the "Free Energy" argument) or has it become mostly a waste of time due to the explained reasons?
   I also believe this device is not overcomplicated and with average electronics experience it is possible to replicate and that something is missing in it's interpretation (which is the reason these devices are most feared as then would be easily replicable by all). Now we have two problems: first is to rule out that the device is not bogus and if not, find how it works. Based on every person's individual education, knowledge and personality, this is where the "fun" begins and also where the "loop" starts. The over abundance of (mis)information out there disgregates the purpose of the research itself creating smaller and smaller agglomerates of directions who end up in contrast: divide et impera. This happens primarily for 2 reasons again: lack of fixed references (no specific or correct knowledge, no experience) and subsequent frustration (loss of time and money). The misinformants play with both of the above and the result is a controlled caotic behaviour leading nowhere. If at some point there surfaces a spec of evidence of clean reasoning and correct intuition, it is vomited upon with hundreds of others, or simply ignored. This ancient method is actually applied at all levels of our society and unfortunately it works very well.
   I apologize for the longer reasoning but this way I hope I elucidated what I meant by my prior statement. My last intention is to set anybody back with this - actually the opposite: to avoid wasting ones fruitful potential and avoid falling into the same traps.
Yes, I know, it is very hard if you're being dealt from a bad set of cards and you have a bunch of cheaters at the table.

[desa]

Ok my dear friends free energy experimenters. I reed a lot and post little. I see all the chatter and constructive optimism and then comes cock fight and all falls apart.  We get Stphanov  fascinating video and suddenly we are trusted out in the magnetosphere and gaseous sector of the space.  It is easy to get detracted and influenced by informed individual. Then again if he is so informed I would say perhaps he already knows  what we are looking for. Sadly I see no schematics, all I see is agenda. I am also impressed by possibility of using Nobel gasses  or high speed plasma  who knows.  I spent many years with refrigerants to know there is potential. Then again looking at it all from higher altitude I must admit it should be much simpler. I posted circuit hundred pages back that generated BMF of such magnitude when I got zapped I fell of the chair. Later I found Richard Willis is already having patent with similar device. Potential is there, it is simple and Stephanov video indicates it is similar device only with huge transformer and tremendous output. I am convinced device is genuine and that it works. I can say that because of my experimenting and hands on experience and not because someone told me so.  Now we get this simple device from Tiger2007. Again simplicity and functionality.  After all  this I am not saying I know better than rest of you but I can assure you that device we are looking for is of simple design and put together with simple inexpensive components easily obtained.  To sum it up it comes down to Ferrite material  for the core and for simple reason because of the easily manipulated domains. Easier to flip simpler to extract. Cosmo experiment schematic is step in right direction alto having ferrite ring core I had difficulty with bleeding high voltage. The problem is in controlling current. Tiger2007 flip flop transistor setup is same as the Cosmos and the direction to look into. As the domains are flipped with square wave we have sudden change in direction and BMF is superimposed on the wave out of phase. Current lead voltage â€" voltage leads current, inductive capacity  lode charge discharge.  The scope marker sections in the video. I think we should come to some sort of the consensus and work on the schematics instead than going in thousand directions at once. I am convinced this is way to go. Hope it make sense to you to.
Respectfully.
David.