Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[quarktoo]

Q2
Nice PDF ,
the last pic on the bottom left looks like Herkers
Build .
I feel the list that Core made is a step in a good direction
Core
Quote:
So a small recap of presented theories: (Note: If I got your theory wrong please respectfully correct me)
A. LtBolo: Acceleration / Deceleration - Removing energy from the photon.
B. Herger: Pulsing a coil for 'Radiant' energy.
C. Q2: Compression / Decompression - Ejecting electrons from a mass??
D. Dole: 'Cold electricity' - Utilizing the 'Standing / Stationary' wave as a form of excitement.
E. Core: Incorporating the atmosphere in the design - Removing energy from the excited ambient (Q2 has rather comically named it 'the sewer pipe')
-------------------------------

Q2
Which theory do you feel is represented in the PDF you shared?[if any]
Thanks

Chet

I think core's sewer pipe 'O' energy describes the process best but they all describe parts of it. Find that Russian video of the guy with the power supply and two coils propped up with foam. He appears to be replicating the effect of Tesla magnifier. You pulse the ambient, phase change and back feed from what I can gather. Broke symmetry and back emf suppression description seems plausible and fits what is seen on the coils.

I don't really have a theory, rather since nobody is figuring it out, I try and provide a bunch of Ideas that people can explore.

The rule with a homicide investigation is if you have not solved the crime in 3 days, start over from the beginning - you missed something. I think what got missed is the obvious Tesla patent or the understanding of it and for now anyway, I think this is worthy of experiment.

I beat the SR circuit up on a bench and got lots of cool effects but did not see what I was looking for. Now that I have a better idea of what that might be, I see my coils are wound wrong and I can see those coils on the SR device now.

[Ghost_Rider]

Why does everyone think that Herger is Grumpy?

You never really know anyone on an anonymous forum.  One of you could be Eric Dollard.   

Spies.  What a joke.  There is nothing here to spy for.  Who here has an overunity, or free energy device?  No one.  So what is there to suppress?  Nothing.  Not one single thing.  Some of you need to grow up.

Regarding RE, it is "radiant electricity" not "radiant energy".  It is very real.  If you think this is disinfo than the whole story about Tesla's magnifying transmitter is disinfo too, as well as the work of Eric Dollard and many others. 

It's up to each individual really.   To each, his own.

[LtBolo]

And refrigeration system example is a macro-world equivalent.

Well put. Physics is horribly repetitive. We need to learn from what is already known.

I am inclined to think that virtually every Tesla transformer of sufficient energy is OU as it sits. The challenge is in how the energy is collected and converted to usable forms. The random electron activity that is produced by a radiant energy burst isn't usable in that form. More to the point, I'm guessing that radiant energy produces a common mode electrical burst in the metal it strikes. It seems plausible to me that the magic of most of these devices is in how they convert that common mode energy into a usable bipolar electricity, while not interfering with the system that produced the radiant burst to begin with. Most coil arrangements are magnetically and/or electrostatically coupled tightly enough to disrupt the result, and so begins the death of their efforts.

The bifilars or single wire running down the middle or external meshes or xyz are designed to gather the radiant and reference it to some form of ground...without killing what was driving it. My guess is that many folks have hit the production of radiant energy without proper harnessing, or the harnessing of radiant energy without actually producing it, but very few have put both together in the same device. I would even go so far as to suggest that devices like the TPU produce the extra energy in the exact same way and are using the spinning fields to bias the energy and produce a usable output.

[LtBolo]

Why does everyone think that Herger is Grumpy?

The exact schematic he just posted was posted on OUR under Grumpy. That and a fair amount of circumstantial evidence in favor of it, but I don't pretend to have the witch hunting skills down to the level that Q2 does. Not really sure that I care either, unlike Q2, I have no particular beef with Grumpy or anyone else here. Or at least I try not to. I have apparently stepped on a toe or two along the way, but I assure everyone here, if I didn't specifically express my displeasure in a clear and unmistakable manner, then any offense was inadvertent. As a career engineer, social skills are nowhere on the CV.

[LtBolo]

Regarding RE, it is "radiant electricity" not "radiant energy". 

Tesla patent 685958 - "Method of Utilizing Radiant Energy" - seems to disagree.


Speaking of which...just looking over that patent again and saw things I have ignored time and again...

"It is well know that certain radiations - such as those of ultra-violet light, cathodic, Roentgen rays, or the like - possess the property of charging and discharging conductors of electricity, the discharge being particularly noticeable when the conductor upon which the rays impinge is negatively electrified."