Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[AbbaRue]

@wattsup:
I understand that the circuit using the yoke ferrite core is a new simplified version that works. 
No more 25kV tuning capacitor or other hard to find parts. 
Just assemble the new special ferrite coil, and feed into it the HV and the 2 frequencies.
The output coil is a simplified way to make a caduceus coil.
By connecting the 2 opposite ends together the coils magnetic fields cancel each other out just like in caduceus. 

My only questions are about the HV input: 
Should it still go through an AV plug?  Does the frequency of the HV matter?

The oscillators can be made from "op amp IC's'.  ( I think the cheap ones can go up to 1MHz)
Using a dual or quad Op Amp will only need one chip and a hand full of cheap parts.
The high voltage can be made with op amp or 555 timer driven fly back. 
So this whole device can be made from an old TV or computer monitor. 
Only need wire 18 AWG. And op amp or 555 timer chips.

Could T-1000 or stivep  please verify that I have the right concept. 

[FreeEnergyInfo]

@FreeEnergyInfo
all is possible... 

this video ist SPAM ....!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pkvfo6opaiI&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAmDpqhvxZE&feature=player_embedded

VIEV...new video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0LdGSO50l0

COOL VIDEO......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsKa532nYc0
forum...
http://realstrannik.ru/forum/39-kapanadze/102-analiz-replikaczii-ustanovki-tarielya-kapanadze.html?limit=18&start=4230#31530

[wattsup]

@AbbaRue

Thanks for your reply.

The Caduceus Coil (CC) has some very special properties that still needs to be investigated and not just set aside because there is a new Yoke Coil (YC) on the block. This will help me better understand the original TK design. Don't get me wrong though. I have one other yoke available because my first one has a coil designed by @otto on it that I just do not want to take apart for sentimental reasons. So I will make this YC soon enough.

But also, from what I read in your post, we still need the Flyback Transformer (FBT) to feed into the YC. So we still have to find the right FBT type and from my tests with a regular FBT, I now realize that the internal components are not suitable for such a design. (I had to test it for myself but ti does provide great HV output to play around with. Just don't touch the output wires - lol).

If you made a moment by moment depiction of the total process of the FBT, you need those internal diodes taken out because the energy is being pushed around from both directions and this is amplifying the overall FBT output to a different level then if you did it with a standard FBT. So this also has to be better understood. Amongst all of theses variables, eventually it will become evident that a set of features that will be able to use as a base principle in many other device formats, including many of the past builds I already have on hand.

The one thing I do not like is the fact that the first device shown by @T-1000 has already shown to be OU and we should all be jumping up in the air celebrating this fantastic event, but instead, all of a sudden a key component, the CC, has been replaced by this new YC. Usually one of the main rules of OU research is "If you have a working device, DO NOT CHANGE IT."

wattsup

PS: One thing about pulsing the FBT and producing the first spark gap. Man oh man. Every time I had it running it would play havoc with the TV, channels would change, my computer key board would disconnect, programs would open up on their own. So I really have to find a better enclosed spark gap as right now it is only two copper wires.

[bender]

@AbbaRue

Thanks for your reply.

The Caduceus Coil (CC) has some very special properties that still needs to be investigated and not just set aside because there is a new Yoke Coil (YC) on the block. This will help me better understand the original TK design. Don't get me wrong though. I have one other yoke available because my first one has a coil designed by @otto on it that I just do not want to take apart for sentimental reasons. So I will make this YC soon enough.

But also, from what I read in your post, we still need the Flyback Transformer (FBT) to feed into the YC. So we still have to find the right FBT type and from my tests with a regular FBT, I now realize that the internal components are not suitable for such a design. (I had to test it for myself but ti does provide great HV output to play around with. Just don't touch the output wires - lol).

If you made a moment by moment depiction of the total process of the FBT, you need those internal diodes taken out because the energy is being pushed around from both directions and this is amplifying the overall FBT output to a different level then if you did it with a standard FBT. So this also has to be better understood. Amongst all of theses variables, eventually it will become evident that a set of features that will be able to use as a base principle in many other device formats, including many of the past builds I already have on hand.

The one thing I do not like is the fact that the first device shown by @T-1000 has already shown to be OU and we should all be jumping up in the air celebrating this fantastic event, but instead, all of a sudden a key component, the CC, has been replaced by this new YC. Usually one of the main rules of OU research is "If you have a working device, DO NOT CHANGE IT."

wattsup

PS: One thing about pulsing the FBT and producing the first spark gap. Man oh man. Every time I had it running it would play havoc with the TV, channels would change, my computer key board would disconnect, programs would open up on their own. So I really have to find a better enclosed spark gap as right now it is only two copper wires.

wattsup,

where can I see some video, or schematics for this....there are soo many pages I get lost in all of this... is it in this thread, or?

[Magluvin]

@AbbaRue

Thanks for your reply.

The Caduceus Coil (CC) has some very special properties that still needs to be investigated and not just set aside because there is a new Yoke Coil (YC) on the block. This will help me better understand the original TK design. Don't get me wrong though. I have one other yoke available because my first one has a coil designed by @otto on it that I just do not want to take apart for sentimental reasons. So I will make this YC soon enough.

Hey Watts

Ive been wondering what is the connection between the caducius and bifi, as it seems they are replacing the cad with bifi in the second version.

I can see that with the cad coil earlier shown, its like 1 sort coil wound CW and the other CCW and they are connected at 1 end, as can be done with a bifi.
The difference is, the bifi are wound in the same direction, either CW or CCW.

The cad coil looks as if it has no self induction between opposing winds as the fields ar 90 deg from one side to the other. And no proximity between any turns other than crossings(90 deg).

Ive been seein a lot of coils that are wound CW on 1 half of the core(air, other) and CCW on the other half and connected in the middle.

Its an interesting config. If current flows through the coils, the mag fields in the core are in the opposite direction. The other difference is, the A fields of each coil oppose. Supposedly this creates a capacitive state between the 2 coils. Luc did this on a toroid a while back that was self oscillating once started.

Maybe all these, bifi, cad, and opposing series coils have some effects in common.

;]

Mags