Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[energia9]

Hi all!
It seems that this time the miracle did not happen ...
I asked myself - why the lamp radiates light?
With increasing temperature, the Planck function tends to the Maxim.
Electromagnetic radiation is a very small part of the total radiation spiral lamp. This radiation provides an inert gas glow in the lamp. Efficiency of the lamp is very small.
If the lamp 100W shines brighter lamp of 60W
it says that I am not mistaken.
We have created conditions for the glow of gas in the lamp more efficient way ...
I have seen "cold glow", spiral of lamp was dark.
IMHO efficiency of the device is less than 1.

No.

[grizli]

Because if the phase shift is zero then every peak of the LF waveform is lined up with the HF waveform peaks for all LF cycles. As you probably know, this leads to constructive superposition of the waveforms.

We don't know yet if this is good or bad, it's possible that destructive superposition is needed instead?

Also, 380000Hz / 50Hz = 7600

...even the quotient did not come out as a natural number, it can be made so because the authors allow the LF to deviate a little from 50Hz in order to "carry the frequency"

BUT 50 hz is SO SLOW compared to 380 khz

When 50 hz is at peak. 380 khz will PASS at least 50 cycles.. , it would make sense when two freq are CLOSE   100 and 400 khz
but 50 hz and 400 khz really is too big difference

[broli]

Yeah I assumed the 50Hz was used to get the frequency down to what we are used to in our homes. There's little to no significance to phase lock it with the HF signal imo I don't know what shifting the HF signal on the carying would change.

[Rafa12]

I am thinking in buy some Ferrite rings here, http://www.laboutiquedeliman.com/ferrita.html it seems they are not very expensive... But maybe the magnet form could be important? I think I will also try to get ferrite yoke to compare as there is an electronics recycling factory near my village.

[verpies]

Yes, 50Hz is much much less than 380kHz (exactly 7600 times less) and it's very possible that the phase difference between them just doesn't matter, but if it is the case then it must be explicitly spelled out by the inventors, e.g. "the phase between LF and HF does not matter for the OU effect".  It's just good science.

Instead we are given the following statements that imply the contrary:
- about 1 turn feedback windings (feedback is usually used to close control loops, e.g. PLLs)
- about adjusting the ~50Hz of the LF until the "frequency starts carrying frequency" which implies some definite phase relationship.