Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 207 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mannix

Serveral hours of bench time , unfortunately no bright light with my first build.

We do need a standard square wave oscillator with sync lock to use for hf primary.

I did not achieve sync lock but was hoping for a flash at some point.

My plates were copper foil and 20mm wide with cuts so that they fan out about the curve and I have at places 2 layers of plastic tape between the core and the plate.

Every one will be having the same issues and questions about the thickness if the dilectric

I seem to have 1.6mhz and the 51 hz carrying 260khz like the picture but unless I pump  30 watts into the 50hz coil no light . It is very early and I was not able to tune the copper plate circuit  for any effect at this stage.

I see frequency multiplication and division using free resonant checking  that must be significant to be in faze somehow.

I wonder if we tune just with wire length ratios they might be more relative free resonant frequencies?


I am using another (slightly differnt)ferrite for version 1.00001

Something I noticed that might be important is that the ferrite mating surfaces are irregular  from being cracked apart in manufacture ,which is fine if they are clamped together but willl be uneven if a spacer is used...so I have sanded them flat so there is a smooth surface between the ferrites..Of course i guessing here but if ferroresonance is important this might be as well.

good luck


Rafa12

T-1000, I read your reply in PESWiki, well done! this is the kind of reply they needed.

verpies

Quote from: grizli on November 06, 2011, 07:26:59 PM
TRY putting more TURNS to 50 turn coil, make 100 turns and measure frequency , it should drop from 7 Mhz below !!

I think that an unloaded primary coil has no influence on the FRF and BRF, because it cannot oppose any flux changes and its mutual inductance is zero.

By unloaded, I mean a coil that does not have a significant induced current flowing through it (such as an open coil or a coil hooked up to an oscilloscope probe).

On the other hand, the secondary coil that is normally shorted by a significant load should have a significant effect on the resonance frequencies.
...and yes, adding windings to such well loaded coil will decrease the resonance frequencies. Adding capacitance will do too.

Another way to decrease the FRF and BRF is to widen the Braid or use less tape to insulate it from the ferrite it is wound on.  The 2 surfaces of the Braid and the dielectric (tape) form a capacitor over the ferrite core. If the Braid's loop was cut midways, thus separating the two halves of the Braid, then this capacitance could be measured with a meter. However since the two halves of the Braid are not separated, it needs to be treated as a transmission line (with a dielectric&ferrite core)  shorted at one end.

verpies

Quote from: aether22 on November 06, 2011, 07:28:25 PM
And with the output coil, Do you wind the 2 wire together or in opposite directions like a caduceus coil? (that would explain why it doesn't feed-back into the primary and kill the gen.)

I don't think that two halves of the bifilar winding oppose (buck) each other.
It is an excellent question for the inventors. Their diagram does not show bucking, but who knows.

The bifilar winding has some other advantages, such as:
- lower inter-winding capacitance
- the longitudinal current (current along the ferrite's circumference) is cancelled. Normally one layer of toroidal windings is equal to one turn along the circumference of the toroid, because the transverse windings are not absolutely transverse - they also progress along the circumference of the core (winding pitch).

verpies

Quote from: aether22 on November 06, 2011, 07:28:25 PM
Question 3, So if I want about 150w output I don't have the braid connected to anything? And no flyback is used?

Question 4, The braid does not pass between the core halves but a wire connects the inner and outer I assume? (or is the Braid in one piece?)

Re. Q3: The braid should be connected either to:
1) The HV output of a flyback transformer and a spark-gap.
2) A capacitor, that will resonate with the looped Braid, through parasitic mutual inductance with the primary windings.

Note: Not both.

Re. Q4: The Braid should not pass between the core halves because it would make the air-gap between them too large and it would make electrical contact with the ferrite.  In the inventor's model the Braid is completely insulated from the ferrite and the primary windings, and that's what the insulating tape is for.

A short thick wire can/should connect the two Braid halves.
However before you connect the two halves, take the opportunity to measure the capacitance between them, and report it here.