Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[bolt]

its over-unity if the power you get back is more than what you provided in the first place. It has always been that way and no laws broken! An everyday example is Air Con Heat pump provides about 3kw of heat output for 1kw of energy input. Where the excess comes from really doesn't matter.

[xenomorphlabs]

http://www.rexresearch.com/hiddink/hiddink.htm

Shokac i saw your posts on coil kind of capacitor, might be beneficial to unite your idea with The 1 Terminal capacitor, which has taken away either anions or cations,   one charge must remain
to all of those who are interrested in my view on cold electricity , Its simply taking away either positive ions or negative ions of a charge ,   Jo Hiddink explains how he got Bolt lightning from clear blue sky by just using his 1 terminal capacitor
1 Terminal capacitor has to be further investigated, might be a gateway to technology of not just levitation... but unlimited source of energy through manipulating charges by separating them and reuniting them in some way.

i Believe using volt of 1 million volt with extreme low current ,  separating its charge  to two parts and reassembling it in some way will accomplish the so called unachiavable.
The term Overunity would not apply to this, because it s not overunity,  it is not violating the laws of physics,  it just uses Nature to do the job for you

Who sais that Overunity violates laws of physics ?!?
It merely describes the attribute of a device to exhibit a C.O.P over 1 where 1 is referred to as "Unity".
The 3rd law of thermodynamics has so many exceptions in the meantime, that there is actually no "laws of physics" until they are rewritten.

Separating charges requires work, just as in a generator. So only if the energy you spend on that separation is less than the energy you get out of it,  it would be interesting.

[Bartek]

http://www.rexresearch.com/prentice/prentice.htm

[MeggerMan]

The general meaning i get is that you scorn me somehow.. Why is that?

i regarded your last video interesting and amusing! i am not those that are in a hurry to declare OU. If OU is present in your setup, you should exhaustively research it, in more that one setups, complete and diverse power measurments etc. I can help too.

Do not get anxious... if you have something to say, then go on

ps: today i spent some hours of happy replicating your concept.... do not be rushed my friend to judge people

Found this link:
http://yamanashimasamune.blogspot.com/2011/09/single-transistor-flyback-drivers.html
So it appears the type of oscillator is an Armstrong oscillator.


Your wires from the transistor to the pancake coil are far too long, you need that transistor sitting on the edge of the coil other wise your losses will be very high.


I'm wondering if the bulb in Wesley's device is powered by the capacitor that is the metal foil wrapped part way around the coil.
The voltage is supplied to the capacitor is very high but the bulb limits the voltage and pushes up the current to a balanced point of  power, the power being the charge created in the capacitor for each cycle.


Meggerman

[TEKTRON]

Today my father passed away, he was 83 and will be missed a lot.  He was so limited the last few weeks that I feel relief for him now that his struggle is over.

Hope, I'm sorry for your loss.