Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[wattsup]

@itsu

In your last video "Delamorto replication 2.mpeg", when you raised the black coil that is connected in series with the bulb, the bulb got dimmer.

This for me means that there is a very high probability that the Tesla coil is not really inducing anything into your black coil but that it is the fact that the black coil is sitting on the pancake coil that you are getting this effect. Otherwise why would it dim if the Tesla coil increases in voltage as you slide the black coil up, then that light should have lit brighter and not dimmer.

You can always try to do it again but this time put the black coil only on the pancake coil and see if it does the same effect. But sometimes the way things are arranged, it is difficult to separate the effects enough to see the differences.

wattsup

[itsu]

Hi wattsup,

i see what you mean.
I will try some different setup and retest.
I have reduced the pancake like driver coil (7 turns) already to a simple 2 turn wrap
and the streamer on top of the Tesla coil is similar if not stronger.

Thanks,  regards Itsu.

[Kator01]

Fascinating reading.  Illegal light bulbs.

Verpies,

illegal ? No, not at all. You like to buy some ?
http://www.otto-zern.de/lampen-shop/gluehbirne-rustika-oval-p-102.html?zenid=1b389a8763960451ee5241c58d75aa9a

Bulb "Rustika Monoment" - what I name !
http://www.otto-zern.de/lampen-shop/gluehbirne-rustika-monoment-p-103.html

No one cares about this as long a you have trouble to localize the hf.
Only a few highly sophisticated elderly radio-crackheads discovered it.

Kator01

[Hope]

The SAAAR team's and Kurt's waveform are not very similar.
The envelope of the former has positive second derivative and the latter has negative second derivative.
In other words the former is trumpet shaped and the latter is wineglass shaped (like an asymptotic capacitive charge graph)

For the significance of this difference, see LtBolo's post at Reply #9032

LOL,  Verps "similar"    BOTH ARE BUILDING WAVEFORMS.....breath in, breath out and see the correlations please.
(and please give us the square root of negative one).   AND Bolo's post is correct.   Can you please show us your building waveform?

(and "I" is NOT the answer).  irrational numbers are not proof as is Bolo's description is not proof of how the waveform was made.

[verpies]

LOL,  Verps "similar"    BOTH ARE BUILDING WAVEFORMS.....breath in, breath out and see the correlations please.
(and please give us the square root of negative one).   AND Bolo's post is correct.   Can you please show us your building waveform?

(and "I" is NOT the answer).  irrational numbers are not proof as is Bolo's description is not proof of how the waveform was made.

I don't know exactly what you mean by "building".  If it means a positive first derivative of the envelope, then I agree that both of these waveforms are "building".
If you are writing that the second derivatives of these envelopes are both positive, then I disagree.

I cannot show you my waveforms. I am not building the Kacher device because I do not see anything unusual about it.  There are no indications of unusual I/O power ratios nor unusual waveforms, thus I would consider building it, a waste of my time and my resources (but I still can discuss it and help others with it, e.g. wattsup & an oscillator circuit).

There is nothing unusual about an increasing amplitude of an LC or traveling-wave oscillator which is pumped up from an external energy source. (manifested as a wine-glass shape envelope). 
However the SAAAR team's trumpet shaped envelope is very unusual, because the positive second derivative means that the energy increase is not decaying (or approaching a limit) as with the Kacher device and its wine-shaped envelope.

The above is the most significant difference between these waveforms, but not the only one (e.g. see their duty cycle of quiescent periods).

In my post the issue was not "how the waveform was made" but what energy characteristics it represents.

This is an "overunity" forum and the first step in analyzing any device here, should be measuring it OU potential.
OU cannot be shown without a self-runner and without valid power/energy measurements.