Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[baroutologos]

Some how i feel what Grizly is proposing and Armagedon is of the same essence.

...
Griz says that if we have a resonant circuit L1C1 and we apply another coil L2 of few turns that has a load (bulb), the resonance in L1C1 will be disturbed since the mutual inductunce of L1- and working L2 will lead to L1 inductunce to be diminished.

But but having a constant load and by adjusting the C1 to a new value so as to match diminished inductunce L1' then a new resonant equilibrium will be reached (to new frequency or not) and free energy is to be extracted.

I can say with some certainty that does not happens. By possing a load coil L2 this produces not only diminished inductunce that can be compensated by

* adjusting cap value (for same running frequency)
* or modulating pulsing frequency so as to reach a resonant equilibrium somewhere in the middle.

but i feel as if it poses frictional losses as Tesla have said and slows the whole system down. (not just inductance interference)

My Uneducated Wild Speculation
.......
I have the feeling that L1 resonator's flux (+) and L2 load coil flux (-) are canceling each other. Since the flux of resonator equals stored energy in magnetic field terms, we have a total dissipation of energy from the system equal toi the load used. This is what I BELIEVE.

...
By in order to be exact, i must say my tested setups are a nightmere in terms of controlled conditions. Loads (usually lamps) are variable (depending on voltage) and the frequency modulation of (LpCp) primary circuit method was used. By the way you obtain an idea of the situation.

[Omnibus]

It seems there's a massive obsession with dead-end issues such as Tesla ideas, energy from the vacuum, resonance etc. It should be understood that resonance, for instance, by itself cannot be a mechanism for OU. Therefore, the search shouldn't be directed towards those non-issues. Rather one should gear his efforts towards some more plausible solutions such as those proposed by Steorn, say. As it seems both in their eOrbo and ssOrbo Steorn look for some kind of clever ways to circumvent parasitic phenomena, thought inevitable, such as Lentz' back emf but obviously avoidable through specific construction (for instance, relying heavily on the properties of toroid coils). This is where I see the real progress being made, not in the Russian forums which are stuck the same way we're stuck here. I don't even think Kapanadze has anything, probably just bluffing. The sad thing is that Steorn are a commercial entity and this hinders the dissemination of their achievements. Some things have become clear by now, however, and maybe they should be tried by proper measurement of the input and the output energy (not through using bulbs).

[armagdn03]

@xenomorphlabs, I agree with your criticism of @armagdn03. If he really has a device such as Kapanadze's (and he claims he had it even earlier than him) then he should demonstrate it and not only make unsubstantiated statements, especially giving the appearance that he is determined to be open about it. We've seen nothing from him so far and that's nothing new. We've seen a number of such phony claimants, that's sad and should be nipped in the bud.

As for the efficiency of Kapanadze's device, if it really is self-sustaining, as he claims, then its efficiency (not COP, but real efficiency) should be infinite and not just amount to several hundreds.

I had only stated I created devices that were similar to Kapandzes patent, did not mean to allude to anything else. The statements of importance were substantiated.

I also am not looking for attention. I passed this info out after much deliberation during a period when a contract I was held to went null, before it could be reinstated. I had to be careful and thoughtful as things said can have repercussions, for this reason I gave out the most distilled, simple and to the point information as possible.

People get upset if you know something but do not say it,

People complain if you do not say it in the way that they want.

The greats dis sapear......Allcanadian...Doc Stiffler....Erfinder...

[baroutologos]

@Armagedon,

I have not tried your scheme but i do not htink it will produce any OU. My personal view i have posted above. I can make a wager with you of 1,000 usd in case this works and considerable OU can be extracted that way... thinking it again you could have applied for the OU prize and earn much more.

By the way, yes stupidity etc exists in forum likes this that frustrates serious experimenters. On the other hand you cannot pass your point of theory (or Dr stffler's etc) if it is not valid or does not produces considerable results in practice. (not minor signals that only O-scopes receive and can be attributed to any cause)

...
Assuming with your theory a generator had been developed by you or someone else of 10Kw, we would not have this conversation now. right? We would talk about specifics only.

[xenomorphlabs]

Talking of scammers, if someone has $500 to waste
then he can simply buy a Kapanadze generator now from
this clever guy: http://russiankapanadze.far.ru/   

who does not seem to be associated with Kapanadze at all.

And this creepy demonstration: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9WxedS8uSI
A PVC tube shown connected to nothing except the heatpipe(ground)
powering a 500 watt spot.

Posted by Teofilius (remember his "demonstration" ?) , who brought this into the discussion today here : http://www.skif.biz/index.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=241673#241673
and on www.matrix.3nx.ru

He seems to have been in correspondence with the seller, because he
obviously knows more about the whole thing than that cheap website reveals.

http://mastername.ru/whois/?domain=russiankapanadze&ctld%5B%5D=ru&ctld%5B%5D=com&ctld%5B%5D=org&ctld%5B%5D=biz&ctld%5B%5D=net&ctld%5B%5D=info&ctld%5B%5D=name&ctld%5B%5D=mobi&ctld%5B%5D=su&ctld%5B%5D=cc&ctld%5B%5D=tv&ctld%5B%5D=eu&ctld%5B%5D=me&ctld%5B%5D=co.uk&ctld%5B%5D=org.uk&ctld%5B%5D=tel&ctld%5B%5D=%F0%F4