Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[baroutologos]

Can you also provide:
- photos of the FWBR-Analog meter?
- 1 lamp lit by mains and 1 by your Kapagen?

[dllabarre]

Can you also provide:
- photos of the FWBR-Analog meter?
- 1 lamp lit by mains and 1 by your Kapagen?

The next time I get my Kapagen out I'll take those pictures.
I didn't have time today because I had to get to work.
I just wanted to prove to myself that my original measurements were within reason.  Being the original readings taken with a Kill_A_Watt meter were slightly higher than the analog readings I wanted to get a post out.

DonL

[xenomorphlabs]

IMO the schematic posted by Jesus (nievesoliveras) above is very similar to the Kapagen and "I think" it was one of the original designs of Tariel Kapanadez for his earlier device.  I may be wrong so don't go nuts on this.

Without going nuts on this, but again Kapanadze NEVER published any detailed circuit schematic. The schematic you are referring to has been made by Alexander Frolov and is merely an attempt to explain what is going on.
It does not take into account a couple of things that are present in Kapandze´s device ...

[Judges]

I keep thinking back to the FIRST,,,,,showing a large,?buried? ground cable showing 22 amps.Henries or uH,may be an important factor,inductance in the ground connector that is.

I don't know if this was a 4,6,3,whatever conductor cable,,could have been a welding cable for all I know,,,,,,

Good luck guys,,,I have all the stuff to build,,just no get up and go.(health issues,,,my mind says yes but my body says no)

A good basic rule in a situation like this is for at least two or three to get on the same,exact as possible, First Page of replicating.

Joe in Texas
The MOT itself is a study in transformers.The secondary is easily removed from the core,,ie: changing things,,you guys doing that??,,,,,removing the other end of the secondary from the EI core??

[Acca]

THE PROBLEMS WITH BUILDING OPEN ENERGY DEVICES, A REASSESSMENT !

 
I  had, one thousand people interested in what I had to say, about my machines at one of  my seminars. 

Now out of  that one thousand, one hundred will attempt to put some effort to replicate a device, which is less than one percent of the people who attended the seminar.

Out of those one hundred people about fifty will not understand the whole concept or they just don't have enough background to make the device, they still have the passion and seek more information for the future.. 

The fifty people who are left, attempt to build some type of  a device. Out of those fifty people twenty are lone wolves and work alone, some have trouble following simple instructions, some make the coils too big, some reverse the diodes, some reverse the windings and some think like  "electrical engineers" and they too fail…and say that the devices DON'T WORK, it's like different stories of the same event viewed by a group and you have different interpretations… 

Soo.. what is left ?  I think about twenty people, these individuals have formed a research group,  as a group they know that team work will help, however some members are stubborn  and they cannot agree, as to "how such a device should be constructed and what materials should be used", this device is NOT a toaster, "but a free energy device" and that's where things get complicated.

Fifteen reach an impasse due to very strong personalities, and they cannot reach consensus and chips on their shoulders do not fall, no consensus to sway the others about build  materials size and mechanical placement of components and the most important THE THEORETICAL OPERATION.. 

Now we have ten individuals left,  four of the ten individuals brake away and form their SPECIAL theoretical build group as to THEIR interpretation as  they have their own ideas, and off they go.. 

Six individuals are left out of  the ten, and now these individuals have made a effort to agree, as to the nature of  the device and it's hypothetical operation, but as we all know, six people in a group is too many, and again we split up six people in to two teams,  and off they go…

Some four weeks pass, and the TEN individuals who where in the three teams, build a total of "THREE" devices out of a possible ONE THOUSAND interested  people at the seminar, the team members show off their free energy devices.

All three devices look very  different,  one of  the devices doesn't even work,  it is well under unity and "the theory" is lambasted as it is a dead end.

The other two devices are VERY MARGINAL in their operation, it is very difficult  to make measurements and to establish an OVERUNITY operation, there in an inconclusiveness as to why they should work and if there is any effort to be made to follow through any more. Needless to say five of the six builders quit and go off  to follow  other pursuits.   

One out of  one thousand is a fantastic odd "it's like a sure thing", if one compares a lottery and chance games where the odds will run into the millions you have already beaten the odds. What we have here, are the "one thousand individuals on this forum", which already eliminated the million odds and now are reduced to a sure thing…..  If you will follow the analogy of my story you will see that the good as well as the bad.

It takes "VERY HARD WORK" to understand and LEARN and LOTS OF FREE TIME used that could be used for other things, and failure is part of  the job. discovery is doing.  If you are crying that it doesn't work, it's because you DID NOT SPEND ENOUGH FREE TIME TO LEARN AND BUILD devices and your failure rate is "NOT EXISTENT".  SO "YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO COMPLAIN THAT IT DOESN'T WORK"  and flame others for your inadequateness. YOU ARE NOT WORTHY …GO ELSE WHERE. Try "My life is miserable forum"…

I have been following posts on energy forms for many years and the conclusion is still the same… Stick to building devices and debate them. 

I suggest the following simple advice to forum members:

1. Keep YOUR opinions to your self about other members and ONLY DEBATE TECHNICAL MERITS OF THE DEVICES.

2. No personal attacks on individuals who have  built  a  any DEVICE ! Those that who haven't built any thing should keep silent! You are NOT worthy. 

3. This forum is FOR DISCUSSION OF such devices as to how they work or not work is immaterial, this is a DYNAMIC SYSTEM for the  progression and the development of such devices and ideas. 
 
4. Philosophers of  a "sitting type", we need hands on experience builders and just like in the above example, WE  DON'T need  information that is NOT RELATED to the DEVICES. Show us what you have built and we will then comment..

5. The entry to this forum should be a device that was built by YOU ! So that we can say Wow that looks Good… Now how does it work  

Building and testing and more testing is what it's all about, and some commentary…. 


I myself  will keep experimenting and building in my garage till the early hours, I believe that it usually starts in the "Garage" or a basement…
If I have any IMPORTANT information I will post it, as it relates to any of my devices...
 
P.S. as you will notice that I don't post very often, but when I do, I make a point.. and not often. This is that POINT...

G-day..

Acca….