Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[dllabarre]

Maybe this is the famous Kapanadzes self runner!!!

Jesus

How do you wire a Earth ground into the middle of the spark gap?  I don't understand that schematic symbol.

DonL

[nievesoliveras]

That information is on the link posted by @catalyst
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/DonSmith.html

Almost at the end.

[dllabarre]

That information is on the link posted by @catalyst
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/DonSmith.html

Almost at the end.

I found it.

Thank you!

[dllabarre]

@All

. My power supply is 2,000 volts AC.

Respectfully,

Core

I just tested my neon transformer and it's only putting out 300VAC at 165kHz - not the 2000VAC on the label.... 

Bummer

DonL

[catalyst]

Sorry to bother, but i have to cross compare the different designs and bring up their differences. I'm sure this is useful for some topic readers.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/kapagen/k32.gif
Naudin's replication has all coils connected in serial, and i see no meaning in it. It works somehow, and it has absolute nothing to do with what was replicated. I started my way through his design, so again, thanks for it. If this design used more HV and high frequency instead 50 Hz, maybe he would get much better results? I had dismantled a microwave oven to get the transformer (MOT). To have 4KV, one could use 2*MOT, where primary is parallel @ 220V and secondaries are serial connected. Or a full-wave AC voltage doubler maybe can be used: http://www.play-hookey.com/ac_theory/ps_v_multipliers.html
High frequency is key condition to create more flux lines in L-2. But there L-1 and L-2 are swapped. Confusing, better forget about it. I would not waste time with it.

The more correct design would be Smith's design. He explains very well about cable lengths to be in accordance to RF antenna design, with circuit matching etc. Very well explained. Smith's design was all standard physics. If i wanted to have electricity on my own, i would perhaps go with Smith design depending on the law of squares, if it really works that way. Nowadays high voltage diodes etc are easy to find.

Now comes Tariel's approach. Cosmo's hint is given, with the new way of thinking:
"1. No - it comes from changing parameters of ferrite medium"
"but if you change medium in ferrite, you can turn it into supermagnet who have a high potential."

Smith always said that some part is missing in his public revealed designs. Maybe exact this ferrite phenomenon is meant missing and it was already used in Smith's working device ? Maybe Tariel re-discovered this ? I assume Tariel's genius is the one who take the credit of changing ferrite medium state.

I only act as a catalysator to contribute different aspects. The guys actually building the test benches and doing the measurements are the heroes here. Now, how can it be set-up and tested to modify ferrite medium's state? It was said it's not that difficult at all. Is there a ferrite rod (or a simple iron bar) in addition to the ferrite rings ? Which of them, the ring or the rod or both are changing their state ? What is the purpose of the ring ferrites? Is L-2 wound on outside of rings with center tap and L-1 is at inside of the rings (how many turns ?) and is L-1 wound on a rod perhaps ? Is L-1 positioned on one half side ? What about the shielding aspect (where does it fit)? (Must not really answer on these, i just give thought hints.)