Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[stivep]

In the picture i shown the signal generator was still on when the lamp were lit yes, but i could not replicate my own experiment since, this is what im asking, what happened?  the two leads of the signal gen was in my hand and the lamp still burning, in other experiments no such phenomena was found, i disconnected the source and the lamp went off in other experiments,
this is what bothers me,

One time is enough

I have stated in my email to shockac that I have seen it.
I was able to burn 150 W light bulb  using 2.75W
Again only one time.

That triggered all of my investment.
Although  my approach is different form many others I'm not interested with delivery of working device as much as I want to understand why is  it working.

So instead  of trying to recreate that one moment I accomplished  my Lab and now I'm taking  care of mechanical  shop with Lathe  Mill and CNC. That is being done  for the purpose of repeatability of scientific investigation

That is the biggest nightmare see it and than find out that you  have choice run to buy another light bulb ,do not touch anything, and everything is temporary mess on the table?
Or just say  I have seen it I will do it again but with proper measurement and proper mechanics.
So far I did not see anyone being so crazy  as me  investing into a dream of
Ending Definitely the old world money suckers from all of us.

If there is any please let me know.

Wesley

[energia9]

thank you for your hard working Wesley friend, i have seen what i seen too, only 1 time, others dont really bother about it as they have not really done their own experiment, but hmm. im in a new fresh state and i try to renew it every day, so i can accomplish this phenomena in a continous way.   i just want to say thank you to every one who make their own experiments, even if they have not suceeded in anything, they gave conciousness,  you are all important friends, imagine what would it be like if this whole forum would concentrate on one thing, well.. i could continue writing stuff, but i need to go now,   Thank you

[ramset]

Wesley
Thanks,inspiring!,perhaps an antennae!

I am placing this post here,from Jibness at Energetic mostly because of your post wesley!
The 4th paragraph is unique !

Jbignes5 
Senior Member   Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 712 

Statics and the conversion of...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was wondering if we could start looking into methods of converting pure static charge into a voltage potential. I didn't think this was possible but it just might be we have been sitting on it the whole time. The spark gap! I think this is the unifying method to convert static potential into real charge that can be used like our voltage in electronics. Of course we would have to separate the capacitor completely from the leyden jar. Although they look like the same concept they are very different.

Leyden jars are designed to hold a static charge inside a statically shielded vessel. This static charge does not behave the same as a Voltage potential does. A static charge clings to a surface. It is merely a thin layer of charge condensed on this surface. Although we can deposit and remove charges via friction it is not necessary to do so to get it to influence other bodies and their charge state. When I say condensed I mean that as a body moves through our space it develops a condensation or attraction of free charges in the ambient environment to move to the body moving through that space via the bodies own charge state when compared to the ambient environment. Whew that was a big statement.

Capacitors work in somewhat the same method but it has more to do with surface area then anything else like room to hold a charge. I believe that the capacitor has an ability to change or rectify the static into real power by raising the base potential value of the plates in a capacitor in effect giving you more punch on the output. In the case of a capacitor the static converter would be the dielectric itself. So in effect this would raise the base value of charge via the dielectric and not the plates. Although the plates can be used to pick up this potential difference, it is converted through the plates contact with the dielectric surface. This capacitance method is only capable of converting small amounts of static but it should be noted that there is a combination that could be used to facilitate a huge difference in the output when capacitors are used in conjunction with spark gaps.

Spark gaps are really only closely placed antennas that can directly interact with the environment to involve more real charges into our systems. These real charges are what we attract to our normally operated electronics and consequently pull into our systems to use as a flow. We have always used these charges and thought we were actually containing these charges within our systems. We have not been containing the charges at all and failed to look outside of our box for the answer. If we started to look at our environment as a seething writhing mass of charges we would understand that we are just focusing and orienting the charges to do our bidding just by either providing or maintaining a potential for the attraction and control of those charges.

Just how hard is it for man to understand that our ancient people knew more about this world because they did not have to know very complex calculations to be able to figure this stuff out. With geometry being the exception to that rule but geometry was all around us so figuring that out wouldn't have been too hard.

Lets look at the Bagdad battery for instance. Most think that these were used as a battery of normal construction but what if they were just merely static leyden jars? The inside was the container for white powdered gold and an oil was used as the dielectric with the pottery being the outside conductor so to speak.

Now this changes the whole premise of what we are looking at.

[core]

That triggered all of my investment.
Although  my approach is different form many others I'm not interested with delivery of working device as much as I want to understand why is  it working.

So far I did not see anyone being so crazy  as me  investing into a dream of
Ending Definitely the old world money suckers from all of us.

If there is any please let me know.

Wesley

I don't like your attitude.

For you to imply that myself and other members 'Personal time and money spent' experimenting and sharing idea's does not somehow qualify is utter nonsense. Did you not stop to think that maybe it's because the 'old world money suckers' 'is' the reason that you have volumes of money to spend on equipment? 

Get one thing straight 'Time spent researching and experimenting is time away from family' for me, and I'm sure others will agree, that time is priceless! More valuable then the money you blew on equipment.

I felt that your last post here, a few weeks ago, was also condescending but I kept my mouth shut. It appears you are well off financially why not build your lab in Russia? I bet kinda hard to do considering that over 80% of the GDP evolves around energy exporting. Take that away and the country is doomed.   

BTW - The I in your above statement is very telling of you. Maybe it should say WE as in We need to understand why is  it working. got it?


And yes, I like this --> 

Respectfully,

Core

[energia9]

people we are not born here to see that things will not change, we are allways changing, and tomorrow we will laugh on this so why be negative now if we are positive tomorrow?  is this topic about emotions or a device which is capable of helping us through this change?  please observe what i have just said, im into experiments and will post results soon, i can contribute with my help, you can do it too.!
All the best to everyone