Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[nievesoliveras]

Sorry I missed this one, it seems a work well done!

It is on page 307.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7679.msg264817#msg264817

Jesus

[nievesoliveras]

The prentice patents reference.

[freshcutgrass]

@ Bart

I think Don Smith deliberately introduced errors into his explanation, those who are knowledgeable will spot them and I think you have.  Introducing a variable resistor should in no way change RF frequencies down to levels suitable for conventional AC use but it can skew the resonant frequency.

Can you clarify the weak oscillations you have encountered in your experiments - were they low voltage/current amplitude (or maybe both)  low frequency or were they heavily damped oscillations?  Some old mag transmitter file I printed off (can't find the website it came from, sorry!) talked about avoiding 'frequency splitting' into the primary, but spark gaps do create a lot of electrical noise across a broad spectrum, which is why they are used for jamming radio signals.

If your primary has a high Q, you don't necessarily have to have a very high input into it to generate a high VSWR, but the higher the voltage the better for a parallel LC primary, IMO.

Can you also clarify which spark gap location caused this weak oscillation?  I'm assuming you are talking about the gap being parallel across the primary circuit.  Also, are you using a series or parallel LC as your primary?

Patrick Kelly talks about the pulsed DC from the NST causing this disturbance, from which additional energy can be captured.  I think that is incorrect.  The NST is a convenient and low cost method of transforming to a high voltage, the diodes trim to DC (I don't think that it is pulsed is really important) but applying a HV DC across the spark/arc gives a HF AC output to resonate the primary, which IS important.  That was the function of the spark gap in early radio.

@Pinoy Tech

If I understand correctly, the receiver has no effect on the transmitter providing it is in the far field, at least two wavelengths.  All the devices we see have Tx & Rx in VERY close proximity - the reactive near field.  So the Rx will impact upon the Tx, which is why, I assume, the Rx/secondary must be tuned with the (unpowerd) primary present, in the position it will be used when powered.

[Shokac]

If I understand correctly, the receiver has no effect on the transmitter providing it is in the far field, at least two wavelengths.  All the devices we see have Tx & Rx in VERY close proximity - the reactive near field.  So the Rx will impact upon the Tx, which is why, I assume, the Rx/secondary must be tuned with the (unpowerd) primary present, in the position it will be used when powered.

That I am talking about!

This is transformer without Lenz's law!

[core]

John,

   Steve from http://www.i-am-a-i.org/free-energy/powerconverter.html has an interesting concept for the mixing transformer. Have you seen his other thread? I was taking another look at the Virtual Photon power converter, this time with a bit more high voltage knowledge, and I had an idea that relates to this thread.

   After work today I built a very quick 'Proof of Concept' circuit that consisted of nothing more then just a induction coil (older style automotive ignition xfr), High voltage capacitor (35Kv / 400pf) copper plate and spark gap.
I have to say I was quickly rewarded with results. These results may cause controversy depending on what you have read in books regarding high voltage and capacitors.

   As far as I see it I was able to 'pull' a spark from a copper sheet in the air. This is how the experiment was conducted. For HV I used an induction coil 12 volt input for a car. The HV output, about 9000 volts dc was feed to one side of a 35kv 400Pf capacitor. The other side of the capacitor I had a wire that leads to a copper plate mounted on PVC pipe. Also off  the capacitor I installed a spark gap to ground.

   With this setup I quickly fired up the induction coil and every so often I would get a small arc through the spark gap. What is interesting is that the one side of the capacitor is connected to a copper plate. Ground is separated by
a spark gap.

   I was a bit surprised to see a spark and a current being generated. The capacitor is rated for 35,000 volts so 'breakdown' is a non issue.

   I have an old book that I downloaded from the internet about high voltage. This book was written during Tesla's time around 1910 or so. The most interesting park of the book was a paragraph regarding HV. This author states that HV run like a sound wave.
   The example he gives is as follows. Two steel pipes are separated by a rubber insert. HV is applied to one half, this voltage will not travel to the other steel pipe due to the rubber gasket between the sections. What will travel are the vibrations from the high voltage. He compares it to talking to someone through a wall. You can hear the person due to the vibrations passing through.

   Going back to my experiment I believe the vibrations from the HV are passing through the capacitor, This is creating a negative voltage on the other side of the capacitor and copper plate. With respect to the discharge of the induction coil this voltage is negative, but with respect to ground this would have to be positive.

   As it stands I was firing this by hand. A driver for the induction coil would be much better to have.

Respectfully,

Core