Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 351 Guests are viewing this topic.

quarktoo

Dole,

Towards the end of your post you refer to pictures and pages. What book are you looking at?

I want to follow your experiments and what you are discussing.


forest


Please bear with me because I'm not an expert.
Yes, I know that nowadays standing and stationary waves are both complementary used. In fact however I think standing wave is very rare in reality , because it require that it is not a wave : it doesn't move along the wavelength direction of superimposed conjugate waves.
There are only standing nodes and antinodes. Group velocity is zero and no net energy transfer between starting and ending points.
Like here : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCZ1zFPvrIc

That also require the observer which doesn't move in relation to standing wave.And both superimposed waves have to have the same frequency and speed and amplitude.
So you see standing wave is theoretical construct.

What I mean is : Tesla was very precise in naming convention and if he said stationary waves then he thought probably about something different then we expecting today based on standing wave concept.
He wanted to transfer energy but in case of standing wave the only possibility to transfer energy is by make and break standing wave.Such kind of energy transfer would be wasteful and looks like EM  generation. Instead I think Tesla proposed stationary waves - which IMHO - means a wave-packets bouncing along the standing envelope (or in other words a modulated standing waves or in other words  phase conjugated mirror combining many standing waves - see how easily we can obfuscate simple idea :) )

But stop discussing - fortunately I found what I mean is stationary wave  and here is the video (not mine) :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMXlzCX5gio&feature=related

As you see wave is bouncing between barriers , like Tesla waves around globe.
If you wish I could shortly describe how I see resonant circuit could gain energy indirectly using this effect and external energy source untrappable by other ways.

core

Quote from: iceweller on February 09, 2011, 03:40:12 PM

  "Cold electricity" is only an apparent phenomenon, and probably is called so because the device is misunderstood. Tesla *never* mentioned any such thing, he also stated that there were no such thing as "2 kinds of electricity". What has been built by misinformers such as Vassilatos is pure fantasy, and belongs to lala land.

On this you are 100% correct, but you are fighting a losing battle.  :(
Exactly what is stopping people from reading Tesla's lecture before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers at Columbia Collage NY on May 20 1891 entitled 'Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and their Application to Methods of Artificial Illumination' is beyond comprehension. Maybe they just don't know about it. In this lecture you will see clearly where Vassilatos came up with his science fiction idea.

The function of the Lecher arrangement (that would be Hairpin or Tesla stout copper bars for the Vassilatos people) is no mystery. Hertz was the originator (experimentally) then Lecher and a few others. This was a well know circuit in Tesla's time. The circuit is well described mathematically and experimentally in many books written in the early 1900's.

Respectfully,

Core 

iceweller

Quote from: core on February 10, 2011, 12:24:39 PM
On this you are 100% correct, but you are fighting a losing battle.  :(
Exactly what is stopping people from reading Tesla's lecture before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers at Columbia Collage NY on May 20 1891 entitled 'Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and their Application to Methods of Artificial Illumination' is beyond comprehension. Maybe they just don't know about it. In this lecture you will see clearly where Vassilatos came up with his science fiction idea.

The function of the Lecher arrangement (that would be Hairpin or Tesla stout copper bars for the Vassilatos people) is no mystery. Hertz was the originator (experimentally) then Lecher and a few others. This was a well know circuit in Tesla's time. The circuit is well described mathematically and experimentally in many books written in the early 1900's.

Respectfully,

Core

   Yes to all of the above. Tesla's lectures, articles and interviews are available online and offline, so it's (nearly) all out there. Additionally, I can upload a brief paper I put together some time ago demonstrating exactly how Vassilatos did this in his book, with all the references for those interested.

dllabarre

I changed my mind and erased this post.
Too bad we can't delete posts.