Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[leo48]

 
We are almost 380 pages and still groping in the dark .....
Leo48

[quarktoo]

LtBolo
Quote:
Take sonocavitation and associated sonoluminescence. Is that a thermodynamic event? I'm sure some would say yes, largely because they don't like the implications otherwise, but personally I think it isn't strictly so. More to the point, when we mechanically force a phase change rapidly against the normal order, the energy required gets drawn from somewhere, and when it collapses, the energy is released. A more mainstream view would suggest that for cavitation to occur, there is a spontaneous removal of heat in the area immediately surrounding the bubble. Perhaps, but I suggest that even more has been drawn than can be accounted for. When the bubble collapses, we get photon emissions...sonoluminescence...as the previously absorbed energy is returned faster than heat transfer can accommodate.
--------------------------

Mr, you make a lot of amazing posts!
This one I'm having framed and putting it on the Fridge.
Thanks for being here and sharing your thoughts.
Chet

Ramset you slut!

Did Mr. perfect paragraph Bolo build one of these? Please stand and join with me in singing the US national anthem.

The Methernitha device is so similar it is worth pointing out that they mechanically switched rather than attempt transistors. According to Paul Potter's description, there were ring magnets that were air gapped.
http://www.grigiotorino.it/progettomeg/testatika.htm

Here is a short article by someone thinking about how compression/decompression by moving the capacitor plates away from each which increases voltage. That increases tension which increases acceleration. That takes work - breath in.
http://freenrg.info/Methernitha/About_Testatika.html

In the proper configuration, I could see how increasing or decreasing the gap between ferrites could increase or decrease capacity which could breath in or out energy from the ambient. The spark gap just makes sneeze. How's that for think-y?

Shout out to the new "chosen one bringer of light to humanity" LtBolo - interesting concept.

I could have used shrink tube and even had the appropriate colors on the shelf but wanted to keep it real, man. Still working on the nose cone section.

Note how I am increasing mass as I move toward ground. Final stage will be large litz wire. Thinking Adrian Krone and negative resistance. (negistor and multipaths).

[LtBolo]

Did Mr. perfect paragraph Bolo build one of these? Please stand and join with me in singing the US national anthem.

Dude, I'm nobody's enemy and I'm nobody's groupie, and I'm certainly not a spook. I'm just another guy trying to reason through this well enough to know why I think something might work, and how I might go about building it. My theory is based on much reading, much observation, and much generalization of observable behavior. It might be right, but I'll be the first to admit it may be very, very wrong. I am a very capable engineer, and have done some very nice work in my 20+ years doing what I do, but the FE gig is well outside my normal expertise.

As for the building...well, we're getting very close to doing something. The big thing has been trying to come up with some testable predictions, and wanting to know what the safety threshold is. I have very real fears that when these devices start doing what they are supposed to do, they will be operating at levels that you would do well to respect. The biggest question in my mind right now is what level of electron energy is necessary for producing power. I expect it to be a gradient that extends from very low levels to very high, with high levels being dangerous, even fatal. If it turns out that at the very least it takes X-rays to make power, I'm not sure that any of it is safe without shielding. On the other hand, if it will operate at lower levels, it may not be so bad. Given that very high energy photons (gamma) are known to actually produce electrons, it may be that we need to be at those levels. That is a tough design problem, and a bigger safety problem.

Whatever you do, be safe.

[stivep]

@stivep

Hope you don't mean Armenia. lol

No we all know  what country I have had in mind.God bless Armenia

Wesley

[core]

At low ambient pressure, the default state of the refrigerant is gas. We compress it to force the phase change to extract the heat, and then allow it to return to ambient pressure and reabsorb what it gave up during compression. At high ambient pressure we have to do it in reverse, and there we call it cavitation. The key is in understanding what your ambient state is, and where the phase change occurs.

I have to respectfully disagree with you. The phrase 'At low ambient pressure' is a bit ambiguous. I can only assume you mean sea level or 29.96 inches of mercury. To follow it up with 'the default state of the refrigerant is gas' states you are simply talking about a particular type of refrigerant known as 'High pressure refrigerants' and excluding 'Low pressure refrigerants'. High pressure refrigerants require a positive displacement pump (compressor) to create the energy transfer. A good example of a compressor-less system is an 'Absorber' a water or ammonia based system.

  In a refrigerant, or heating system some form of pump is used to 'keep the process going'. It must be clearly understood that the pump 'enhances' the operation and 'is not' a requirement.

As an example. In a dry room a glass of water is set on a table with its starting water level marked. After a period of time you notice the water level has dropped significantly. Where did the water go? The water was evaporated into the air due to the simple fact that the water was at a higher energy level then the air. Both the air and the water are subjected to the same atmospheric pressure, sea level in this example. BUT since the water was contained more energy then the air it was at a slightly higher pressure then the air. The evaporation and condensing process is natures way of equalizing this pressure differential. The opposite is true also. If a dry material, or one who's moisture measured in Grains is less then the air's, will absorb energy from the air. The absorption rate will continue until nature reaches an equilibrium. If I remove moisture periodically from my 'so called' dry material I will keep an energy sink going between my 'Dry material' and the atmosphere forever.

  In closing my theories and LtBolo's theories are not to far apart. The BIG difference is that I believe that the ambient, and its electrons and ions, are already at an 'accelerated' state and 'deceleration' is just needed to obtain energy. LtBolo, I believe, states that an electron must be accelerated first then decelerated to obtain energy.

As stated before great discussion.

Respectfully,

Core