Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 196 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ghost_Rider

Quote from: LtBolo on February 14, 2011, 09:43:36 PM
Well put. Physics is horribly repetitive. We need to learn from what is already known.

I am inclined to think that virtually every Tesla transformer of sufficient energy is OU as it sits. The challenge is in how the energy is collected and converted to usable forms. The random electron activity that is produced by a radiant energy burst isn't usable in that form. More to the point, I'm guessing that radiant energy produces a common mode electrical burst in the metal it strikes. It seems plausible to me that the magic of most of these devices is in how they convert that common mode energy into a usable bipolar electricity, while not interfering with the system that produced the radiant burst to begin with. Most coil arrangements are magnetically and/or electrostatically coupled tightly enough to disrupt the result, and so begins the death of their efforts.

The bifilars or single wire running down the middle or external meshes or xyz are designed to gather the radiant and reference it to some form of ground...without killing what was driving it. My guess is that many folks have hit the production of radiant energy without proper harnessing, or the harnessing of radiant energy without actually producing it, but very few have put both together in the same device. I would even go so far as to suggest that devices like the TPU produce the extra energy in the exact same way and are using the spinning fields to bias the energy and produce a usable output.

There are a lot of assumptions when it comes to the magnifier.  Most are built for long sparks and the how or why doesn't matter.  Tesla said he never made a statement as fact unless he first verified it.  He said his transmitter magnified energy, so I am inclined to believe it.  He never explained in great detail how it worked, just that it did.  I have always felt that he may have discovered some powerful aspect of the technology that could be misused, and therefore the details were probably best left unknown.

Your deductions appear plausible.

Kapanadze said he had studied Tesla's work.  The best thing at this point would be for a few people to explore Tesla's radiant electricity.


Ghost_Rider

Quote from: LtBolo on February 14, 2011, 10:11:09 PM
Tesla patent 685958 - "Method of Utilizing Radiant Energy" - seems to disagree.


Speaking of which...just looking over that patent again and saw things I have ignored time and again...

"It is well know that certain radiations - such as those of ultra-violet light, cathodic, Roentgen rays, or the like - possess the property of charging and discharging conductors of electricity, the discharge being particularly noticeable when the conductor upon which the rays impinge is negatively electrified."

good point

c-man

I have put together a coil similar to the Kapagen. I Connected the MOT to "house ground" and the string of Ten 100Watt incandescent lamps to the copper water service for my house. The lamps would light to the same intensity whether I connected through the coil or whether I connected the string of lights directly to the spark gap. After thinking about the design it seems to me that the coil is simply length of wire wound in different directions. The three coils are actually one. How can this affect voltages & currents?

quarktoo

Quote from: Ghost_Rider on February 14, 2011, 09:38:17 PM
Why does everyone think that Herger is Grumpy?

You never really know anyone on an anonymous forum.  One of you could be Eric Dollard.   

Spies.  What a joke.  There is nothing here to spy for.  Who here has an overunity, or free energy device?  No one.  So what is there to suppress?  Nothing.  Not one single thing.  Some of you need to grow up.

Regarding RE, it is "radiant electricity" not "radiant energy".  It is very real.  If you think this is disinfo than the whole story about Tesla's magnifying transmitter is disinfo too, as well as the work of Eric Dollard and many others. 

It's up to each individual really.   To each, his own.

For the same reason we know you are POYNT99. Your LATIN slogan which the spooks like to use translates into "Bullshit Baffles Brains" which is what Grumpy does.

Baffle this .99:
The most important part of this invention is the 1/4 wave conversion. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The 90 degree phase change erases that Newtonian law.

The magnifying coils eliminate the back EMF and the large ground wire is a mass anchor to keep the phases from twisting each other and the ground so that the coil can pick up that radiant electricity it is transmitting. My guess is that coming right off that 1/4 converter you need that large wire to keep the phases 90 degrees apart and in fact that is seen in the videos.

The spark gap I feel is needed for more than safety since tying these two coils together with wire is going to destroy that phase shift The device is a transmitter that is fed from what it receives. Where does the energy come from? Lt BOLO may have the best explanation there.


I've learned a few other things lately but those are the most important parts.

Now why don't you go back to OUR .99 and get lost like people keep telling you. We are tired of the counter - intel tactic called "poisoning the well" or as you put it with your tag line, "baffling our brains with bullshit".

Just like Grumpy said, you throw a little meat in there and they spill the beans. Well since I knew what you spooks were up to and how you operate, I have been able to separate some of the meat from the BS and learn instead.

The first step into finding your way out of the spooks matrix, is figuring out that you are even in it. Wattsup figured it out - Kudos!

I've been told many times I am the most determined person someone has ever met. I am unbreakable and I know that about myself. Been tested many times.

A long time ago some spooks and military assholes had a go at me. It took me 8 months, but in the end, I broke them. Grumpy lasted a few months and 99, you lasted even less. Go away or I am going to ride you like a rented mule all the way into the light of day.

You wrecked this forum by taking "people of interest" to OUR where you could intensively spy on them without having to read through all the BS here and where you could keep them from spreading information.

You are a creepy person.

exnihiloest

Quote from: quarktoo on February 14, 2011, 03:30:28 AM
You do love your math. Accountant?

This question is not related to the thread. Sorry if you have problems to stay in the analytical method.
I don't love maths. But we need them to avoid erroneous reasonings, so I use them as well as experiments. If you are not able to deal with maths to check baseless assertions, and not able to experiment what is claimed, you will fall in each trap of verbiage.

Quote
Naturally you ignored the salient points like silver wire, high voltage and a bifilar coil on top "plucking those electrons off the coil" like Stan the man did.
...

"Naturally" I don't ignore "bifilar coil",  "silver wire" and so on. I know they are the magical words of incantations from not skilled people.
A "bifilar coil" is just a coil with a distributed capacitance higher than an ordinary coil.
A silver wire is just a wire with a bit less ohmic resistance than copper... And if electrical, nuclear or chemical reactions need silver instead of copper, show us how.

Quote
All I can do is speculate on what I see like anyone that is not here to spread disinformation.

There is two way for spreading disinformation. One is voluntary, to deceive people. I'm sure that it is not your case and you sincerely think what you write. The other one is by ignorance.
Speculations without likelihood because supported neither by facts nor logic are useless. If you are impressed by words, I'm not. I showed that your assertion of "accelerating electrons by centrifugal force" has no meaning, and your digression about "love of maths" or "accountant" confirms the emptiness of your previous speech.