Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[quarktoo]

This is also an interesting video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44iT-wtj-o0&feature=player_embedded

I think what was more interesting is how it changed the frequency. That was a good find scratchbot!

Here is what you are trying to build. The red arrow is where kapanadze sticks either a  bifilar coil into the core or you can use a coaxial coil if you attach to the other end where it could comes out.

The coil is split in the middle just like the tesla coil image and REVERSE wound so they oppose each other. This creates a standing wave that opposes in the middle. Then you attach the load to the ground at one end and the other end of the wire that runs through the center - very similar to a one turn transformer. That appears to be the basic idea.

Dole had it right and the Russian sites are figuring out that they need a standing wave.

READ THE VLADIMIR UTKIN FILES!!!

[stivep]

Response from scientific group to:

"Some of this questions there are so unbelievably stupid
But you need to ask  to draw the picture.And subject is not stupid at all."

Answers:
Hi Wesley,
    Below are my answers.



A.is magnetic field wave and if it is
is that:
1-standing wave
2-stationary wave
3.traveling wave
4. mixture of everything
5. none of above

(If your answer is 5 than what is it ?)
A static magnetic  field has no wave properties. (5)


B. doest magnetic field have mass?
    A magnetic field does not have mass. It is a static energy field.


C. Is magnetic field  represented by propagation of  electrons?
There is no mass in a static magnetic field. No mass, No electrons, No Protons, No neutrons, No Photons.

D.Is magnetic filed represented by propagation of photons
(if we say D - than photons do not  bend.)
There are No Photons in a static magnetic field.


or "non  of the above"
(if answer is "non of the above" than what is it?)



E. is  photon traveling spherical like  wave in the water? or is sum of distances that at the end show in front of our eye as spherical?
or "non  of the above"
A photon is a particle that contains mass and energy in the form of a wave.  The frequency, wavelength determins the energy level. Higher frequency, higher energy.


(if answer is "non of the above" than what is it?)
Statement:
Photon does not have mass   it is pure energy.. when photon hit the particle containing mass ( air) than it becomes traveling mass ( electrons) or is producing another photon due to heat.
Photons have mass, and energy that is quantized. The photon is a particle.


F.  if magnetic field have mass than how do you measure weight of that mass to conform that it in did is  a mass.
Magnetic fields do not have mass.


when you see iron filing  creating lines around the magnet is that because of photon  propagated from magnet that hit  mass??
No, Iron reacts to the magnetic lines of force in the magnet because iron has the key chemical properties that respond to magnetic fields.

If so than where is the heat that made photon?
A photon is a particle in the quantum model of an atom used to calculate the energy associated to the mass. The photon is the energy relationship to mass associate to the wavelength of the energy.




Wesley

Prepared by John and Wesley

[the_big_m_in_ok]

I think this is the schematic of that video

Just a thought?
Referring to schematic in posted Reply #5783?  It's a straightforward circuit.  Assuming a toroid is used, has anyone in Western/Central Europe or America proven OU with this high voltage circuit.
NOTE:
Careful for high voltage.  Not something to take lightly.

--Lee

[the_big_m_in_ok]

I totally agree.  I do not have full moderator powers on this topic....yet.  If/when I receive them, it will be different I promise you.  We should all observe the TOS that we agreed to upon signing up for this site.
I will keep you posted.
Thank you,
Bill

I had my run-ins with a couple of Members, myself.  One is at the end of the thread I started,

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8010.msg274737#msg274737

Others have complained as well that hartiberlin does nothing.

--Lee

[iceweller]

Just a brief personal note for all the sincere researchers I feel obliged to include at this point. I apologize for the slight off-topic.
Disinformation and disruption schemes work the same world wide and have been proven to be effective. Apart from the "innocent" disinformation by mere ignorance as suggested by ex-nihilo-est, the premeditated and predetermined one works in a "team" fashion, not just concocted by one single "stray" element or "agent". It is represented by a "controlled" group where apparently the elements flame and attack each other constantly in a specific pattern with similar wordings and sometimes with schizophrenic tendencies. One, or the other, gain the unaware users' trust or demise as it is standard for people only to discern and sympathise between 2 apparently opposing parties. The truth is, one should not side with either one and should be aware of the situation and not let the masked litigation contaminate the pure elements and data of the research.
By this I do not wish to point any finger at anyone. I am merely stating facts which I have learned with personal experience and wish to warn all users of this danger.
Please do not take these words lightly.