Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[ramset]

Bill
Well Its just something to inspire the troops!!
These things [people sharing] tend to inspire those that have held back!

Its an overunity Gravity wheel !!
the Holy Grail of "SAFE TO USE" devices!!

Since we seem to be on Hold till June 20th I figured a little Moral booster would be nice! [Humungous understatement}

Chet

[Pirate88179]

A little premature to cal it an overunity gravity wheel when we have not even seen a video of it working.  How many of these claimed devices have we seen debunked later?

I don't want to sound negative here, if this guy really has it, I will be as happy as anyone, and that is for sure.  We need to see videos, replications and then, if it is real, I will be the first to toast the inventor.  I always hold out hope for this...I just want some more credible proof is all.

I wish him the best.

Bill

[LtBolo]

A little premature to cal it an overunity gravity wheel when we have not even seen a video of it working.  How many of these claimed devices have we seen debunked later?

Ummm...yeah.



Back to TK: This article of Michel Meyer's copper resonance device sounds more and more like the real deal to me. Very narrow, very specific tuning required, but when hit, it wakes up and starts pumping quantum energy. From my perspective, it hits all of the key points and could provide answers to many of the purportedly functional devices. The key to it is not so much the implementation, but the creation of the standing wave of sufficient intensity at the proper subharmonic. There are many approaches to that.

I would very much love to start experimenting along those lines, but would personally prefer to have a better understanding of the derivation of the 172,753.867 Hz frequency. Obviously the actual frequency is much, much, much higher than the subharmonic Meyer chose to drive it with. It would be great to know what the actual frequency is, as that would improve your understanding of the actual goal...which is to ring the outer shell electrons strongly enough to get them to break orbit. Are there any math buffs here that can take the equation from the paper and get a frequency that has a subharmonic that matches his stated frequency? I played with it a bit, and didn't get a number that was remotely close.

I am starting to think that a spectrum analyzer is a 'must-have' piece of equipment to pursue this line of research. Oddly enough, some of the guys that have had some interesting results are older amateur radio guys that approach this from an RF spectrum perspective. Pretty sure that is the correct approach. The discussions of harmonics and not resonance is a not-so-subtle nudge in the right direction. Harmonics are definitely related to resonance, but resonance by itself does not produce harmonic overtones.

[kitkat441902]

Thank you.

[i-get]

Thank you.