Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Muscallt and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

xenomorphlabs

After reading the TK patent for the first time, i was under the expression that the weird way in which the function is described could be due to translation issues for the patent application.
Yet, assuming that this is accurately describing the operation principle, it is the only source of info on the matter.
Attached is the core pieces that talk about the different fields involved.
3 (!) kinds of energies are mentioned. Nothing new in regards to heavyside etc.

I still have a hard time adapting this patent to a simple device such as the new TK device. He states that there is indeed (at first) high frequency in the second bobbin, but is then corrected to the operating frequency.
Maybe that is what is happening in that PVC box.
After all the red cable is going to the PVC box and closes through the ground via the lamps.

Question is if "stabilizing the difference of 2 magnetic fields" means essentially "cancelling 2 different magnetic fields" or having them at a constant "deltaB" at the same frequency like 2 curves with a phase offset.
And more importantly how would you achieve that ? ;)

Somewhere in this long thread a user made an interesting comment on the possibility that TK makes use of "beat" frequencies : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beat_%28acoustics%29

They would have a constant difference between them.
The resultant waveform could be calculated to be 50 Hz (e.g. 50050 Hz and 50000 Hz) and would still contain higher frequencies which would need to be removed just as described in the patent by isolating the beat frequency somehow.

Magluvin

So as you see there is no place for wire diameter in calculation as well.
Main thing people are being  confuse about is
IMPEDANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!! versus RESISTANCE

Hey Stivep  ;]

Thanks for the comprehensive rundown on coils. 

So, can the impedance of the coil be less than the resistance? In resonance?

Thanks  ;]

Mags

stivep

Quote from: Magluvin on October 12, 2011, 12:42:14 PM
So as you see there is no place for wire diameter in calculation as well.
Main thing people are being  confuse about is
IMPEDANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!! versus RESISTANCE

Hey Stivep  ;]

Thanks for the comprehensive rundown on coils. 

So, can the impedance of the coil be less than the resistance? In resonance?

Thanks  ;]

Mags

EXCELLENT QUESTION:
When we are dealing with  DC we have no  impedance
but when we are dealing with AC than we have  impedance.
One of the factors omitted in many of  resonant circuits is   resistance...
Resistance will never affect resonance frequency of the  circuit and/or coil.. as the coil is resonant circuit by itself.
Typically  we should include R as factor for RLC circuits.
But we do not..

Why?

Well   we not often think about current limitation because of R]
We  think that we can deliver more  from  power supply and it does not matter ...
Well we are  wrong.........
That is only  a designer dilemma...
when every bit of power is counted than  yes we need to know R.

Let's take example.
50 Ohm transmitter is connected  to 50 Ohm  coaxial cable than:
If 50 Ohm resistor( purely resistive) is placed at the end of the coaxial  cable( 50 Ohm impedance) instead of  antenna... the transmitter would not know the difference..
( only if rated power on resistor will be higher than  total power delivered by transmitter)

So in resonance circuit ...Resistance will be the leading factor.at resonance frequency only.
In series resonance for that particular frequency we will have close to 0 impedance  so the impedance will/ might be.. smaller than resistance.
The frequency of that circuit will not change..
The resistive  component will take tool on current and voltage and it will be  power ( energy) dissipation factor in the conductor.

The   temperature in the conductor will be  only because of P= V( voltage) x Amp.(current) of the  physical resistance  component of  the conductor.

Wesley

In parallel resonant circuit every possible frequency apart from  resonant frequency will be heaving impedance  close to 0
But  impedance at  resonant frequency will be  close to infinity



   

forest

Guys, you overcomplicate things. Do not think how it works , rather think what we need to get the same effect. Device may be completly different , idea is important.


WHAT WE NEED ? IN SIMPLE WORDS,PLEASE !!!! Imagine a black box device with power/votage/amperage  meters and so on connected to output and then we measure also input power and we attach various loads. How does behave ordinary device connected to power grid and how should behave OU device ?