Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

It was used for TV display 61ЛКЗЦ

That is some concrete data.

The ferrite that the inventors are using came off of an old russian Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) whose part number is 61ЛКЗЦ (61LK3C).

This CRT was used in many of the old russian TVs (models: Elektron, Rubin, Foton, Gorizont).
The link below lists all of the TV models that contained this particular CRT:
http://www.super-phantom.ru/arh/150/6/

Hopefully, one can still obtain such old TV set and cannibalize the yoke ferrite off of it for detailed measurements.

[Jury1]

Hi all!
It seems that this time the miracle did not happen ...
I asked myself - why the lamp radiates light?
With increasing temperature, the Planck function tends to the Maxim.
Electromagnetic radiation is a very small part of the total radiation spiral lamp. This radiation provides an inert gas glow in the lamp. Efficiency of the lamp is very small.
If the lamp 100W shines brighter lamp of 60W
it says that I am not mistaken.
We have created conditions for the glow of gas in the lamp more efficient way ...
I have seen "cold glow", spiral of lamp was dark.
IMHO efficiency of the device is less than 1.

[verpies]

The capacitor is connected to them (copper plates) and makes LC circuit matching ferrite resonant frequency which induce scalar wave impulses.

The plot thickens.

This is most likely a language barrier, but as stated it is ambiguous if:
1) ferrite resonant frequency (FRF) is an independent magnitude to which the LC circuit is tuned...or
2) the ferrite core constitutes an integral part of the LC circuit, which influences the lumped inductance (L) and thus the resonance frequency (a.k.a. ringing frequency) of 1/(LC)^0.5

Option 1 is unconventional in electronics because ferrites do not have resonant frequencies by themselves. They might have an NMR frequency but that is an extremely rare concept in conventional electronics.

Option 2 is conventional because as a combo, a ferrite with a winding on it, does have a lumped inductance and capacitance hence possessing a natural resonance frequency of 1/(LC)^0.5.

BTW: The capacitance (C) comes from the inter-winding capacitance and any deliberately added capacitors.

So which one is it?
If it's Option 1, then please provide a procedure for measuring the NM resonance frequency of the lone ferrite core (not caused by the L and C of the winding).

I would not be surprised if this device depended on unconventional phenomena, such as the oscillation of a lone ferrite caused by the simultaneous application of the magnetic (H) and electric field (E) sharp pulse from the Braid (or copper tape), to the ferrite. 
If so, then after such H & E stimulation, the ferrite should "ring" electromagnetically even without a closed Braid or any other winding over the ferrite.

Such unconventional influence of the E field pulse on ferrimagnetic materials, even causing a variation in magnetic permeability, has been documented by Konrad and Brudny in an article titled "An Improved Method for Virtual Air Gap Length Computation" in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 41, No. 10 from October 2005.
The above effect was very dependent on the composition of the ferrite!

All in all, these theoretical divagations as to the origin of the effect do not matter very much at this point, however the practical question whether the Braid Resonance frequency (BRF) is derived from the FRF or vice versa (e.g. Option 1 vs. Option 2), matters very much for the replication efforts.

[grizli]

LF ~ 50Hz
HF/LF = a natural number
...or in other words LF is a subharmonic of HF

I actually DO NOT think so, because 380khz /50 hz is more than 7000 times... why would phase shift ration according to those two SO different frequencies have any effect ?

[grizli]

No it's not.
It's worse and expensive.

why ?

you have display, power supply and it is inside box with bnc connectors hmm?

And it generates enough high frequency for our needs