Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[stivep]

O boy..... Ganza you are really going offensive.

You know what it is?
Girl was "done" by one who said it to the world.. and than all over the place others say that they "did" her before...him.
So what........even if  it  would be true..
They should say  it before the lucky one...did..

At the end everyone will  be able  to see her beauty Lady OU 

You asking people to do not look at the same what we are presenting ,but exposing what you present...
Ganza it is the same LADY OU..

Who cares if there was Tesla  Who "DID her" for the first time .
heeee....

You are the best prove to all of us that technology works  and we  can have access to her too...
Thank you Ganza for proving our work..
Aidas Arunas And Me have striped her without help of Tiger.. He was only present at 4th hour when she was already naked. Yes he told me that  He have seen her before,,,
At the modern time  Girl is not being punished for her  previous affairs
Tiger should strip her and show the way we did... heee..


The more we move forward the more people will show up with their experience with Lady OU
I have had conversation with Romanow.. Yesterday..
Based on his words He stays that he has working OU  of TK but working witout ground wire so application for powering cars will be possible. 
And he will show as much as we show..
So if he really "did" her  He should respond to our agreement.
Conditions of Gentleman agreement:
If we Arunas Aidas and Wesley  have shown LADY OU but without self powering (she will eat but  only few watts of kilowatts out)
He  will show her eating the same but  in TK concept. or he is going  to be forgotten..
People do not care How it works, but the fact that it works..
He pointed that he has the same approach as we have ..
So prove it I said.
Approximate  time  for him to decide  yes or no  should be today... Did not happened..
I will give him little more time...

Now we will see  everyone who dated her successfully  or not.. Including TK.
I told him that he has no time left even if I understand that he is sick..and he is my friend..

Problem that I have is his friend who mostly  talk to me..and is trying to make sure that all of what I said  will work  for TK..

So my friends all over the world... That is what we need.. Push  everyone against the wall..
You want to give all of the details of that encounter for  free or we find out without  your participation..
how pleasurable it was.. .....

At the end I will have incredibly nice filling... We did it.. we started ... Soon maybe governments will come out with news that they "did her" too heeeee It would be hard for them to prove that they  did her before Tesla.....AND HIS PATENT PROTECTION HAS ALREADY  EXPIRED... or  his marriage contract
is no longer valid heeeee
So she is free to the world..

Wesley

[verpies]

Otherwise, can you imagine the number of readings you would require when pulsing not one frequency, but two or three sources. It would be totally hard to keep track of the meters, their numbers, milli and micro amps,  and all will just create continuous confusions and distract from the main goal.

...Also, my video 3 clearly was done to show only the FG on the Load Group and what the FG alone can do in terms of loaded output. This is my maximum no matter which way you look at it, technically, I should never be able to go above the Base Level no matter the coils or pulsing, etc.

I cannot.

Your faith in the immutable "Base Level" voltage can be easily disproved with a simple transformer driven by a waveform of the same frequency and amplitude but different Crest Factor (e.g. by varying the duty cycle of your signal generator).

A real power measurement setup is immune to frequency and waveform shape variations and would give you the same reading convenience as you have now.

For example with the circuit below you could still use your DMM and read it without confusion with the same convenience you do now:
http://www.eham.net/articles/1024

[wattsup]

@stivep

Dating Lady OU. Hmmmmmm. Now I have to take dancing lessons. lol

wattsup

[Jdo300]

Hello Everyone,

Some preliminary test results to show. Finding the ferroresonant frequency of the core turned out to be much, much easier that I had originally anticipated (and I didn't even use a spectrum analyzer).

Before I begin I should mention that the tests were performed with two BK Precision 4010 signal generators and a 60Mhz HP54603B Oscilloscope.

I have attached scope shots of the waveforms that I observed while testing so everyone here can see what to look for (assuming that I'm getting the correct responses).

Before continuing on more, here's the data I recorded while following the tuning procedure outlined on Aidas' website (http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/aidas/)

Steps 4-6
1.57 MHz (on 50-turn coil, 39V pk/pk)
(signal generator pulsing square wave on metal strip)

This step I believe was the most significant to me of all he testing I did so far. My concern was confusing the ferro-resonance with standard LC resonance of the coils. However, what I observed was that while sweeping the signal generator, the output signal shown on the scope was very noisy and harmonic-rich. As I continued up in the frequency range, the signal gave no indication of approaching any kind of LC resonance point (just from observing the waveforms), but once I hit the first major peak, the output waveform was a Triangle wave, not a sine wave (as shown in the scope shot). I never found any other peaks in the MHz range that gave me any sort of sine wave output with the observed amplitude.

Step 8
Bifilar output, 226.2 kHz 326V pk/pk
(signal generator pulsing square wave on 50-turn coil)

On approaching the resonant frequency for this coil, all the waveforms indicated that the coil was resonating at it's bulk LC resonant frequency.

Step 9
Bifilar output with 50Hz Sine wave input on 15-turn coil:
215.6 mV pk/pk

With the 50-turn coil's generator activated simultaneously, I saw the same HV sine wave output on the secondary. However, in my case, it appears as though when the 50Hz signal is applied there is only a slight (1-2%) reduction in the wave amplitude, but no significant modulation as shown in the original pictures by Wesley and company.

Again, check out the accompanying scope shots below.

I believe that I was not seeing a significant effect from the 50Hz coil because the signal generators I was using could not deliver the needed 2-5W to affect the ferrite core.

Also as a second note, I did not try any tuning capacitors or HV pulses on the circuit yet.

Before I proceed further, could Wesley/T-1000 please give me your feedback on these results. Are these the waveforms I should be seeing for tuning for the ferro-resonance?

Thank you,
Jason O

[itsu]

Itsu,

when I saw your video, I noticed that you measured with your probe across on of the coils ( 15 winding ? ) without load. Assuming a capacity of you probbe of 25 pf ( at least 10 pf ) you have created a parallell tank-circuit with the coil and there is a good chance that you are observing an artefact..
In order to rule this out you must put a load of about 1 MOhm across the coil and than hook a sniffer-coil on your probe. Then search for a point which is near the 15 winding coil and not in the direct field-emission-line of your sender coil.

Only then can you find out where that observed frequency is derived from.

Hi Kator01,

thanks for the comments.

I was probing the copper strip, not any of the coils.
The probe has a capacitance of 14-17pF.
I wanted to try your method, however, it is not doable.
My probe sniffer coil (2 turns) is not able to pickup anything usefull this way, only very high frequency noise.

I tried severall methods to probe this copperstrip, but it keeps coming back to a resonant point around 6 Mhz.

Regards Itsu