Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[energia9]

ОК, I is stopped. Do not want to mislead people.


P.S.
Admin delete my posts, it is the opinion of users - misinformation.


I'm tired of fighting with trolls

Are you scared of my little Warning to people?
you should have been putting up proper measurements by this time.

[Kator01]

.....  Any mass (capacitance) will pull current through the bulb, all your really doing is matching the mass to create a potential difference. .....

...  Without being able to "pin down" the output there isn't any way to really tell if there is any magic going on or if it's simply an illusion of light...

Hello znel,

thank you for this detailed description. Referring to your first comment in the quote listed above, the following might fit which I found in the energeticforum.com posted by MonsieureM concerning mass-match:

   
• Post von MonsieurM
  Originally Posted by dllabarre
  
  Tesla matched the total weight of the primary and secondary windings so the two would be in a state of resonance[/font][/color]."[/font]
  
  So if I take it one step further and factor in 1/4 wave length I have:
  6 awg 79.65 lbs/1000 feet
  12 awg 19.8 lbs/1000 feet
  
  If I use 12 awg for secondary at 4 times length of primary = 19.8 x 4 = 79.2 lbs
  The total weight is the same and I create a 1/4 wave length effect.
  [/font]All in resonance.[/font]

So it would make sense to calculate the mass of the slit inner copper-cylinder adapting it to the mass ot the total secondary HV-coil and repeat the test with the copper-cylinder.

Now back to your last comment: I fully agree. So what I did in order to get a clear picture in another setup where I was testing the losses in a transductor-setup for regulating the power delivered to a 400 Watt halogen-light array:

I placed a photocell in a bigger plastic-cylinder at the botton covered with black paper, put a 500 K Resistor across the terminal of the photocell, so it was not running idle and directed the ligt-bulbs to this cell in a distance of about 1 meter. Measuring the photocell-voltage across the terminals has to be done in a dark room with only the light-bulbs to be tested switched on shining on the photocell.
Now I was able to compare two or more states of output power with a controlled input done with a variac adjusted to the exact voltage-reading I had with my device under test.
Power-measurement is now very exact as I use sinus power from the wall-outlet delivered to the variac.
In this way the maximum error is about 3 to 5 % since the variac accounts most for these losses.
I might be 10 % if the varaic is running idle but under load the losses in the variac decrease significantly.
This point is what verpies was taking about concerning the power-measurement error in the wesley-setup

Thanks again for your description

Kator01

[/li]
[/list]

[xenomorphlabs]

Are you scared of my little Warning to people?
you should have been putting up proper measurements by this time.

Good job! Now your earned yourself a little extra $$$ bonus from the agency ...
Happy?

[T-1000]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdsWHRWzYtg

You need capacitor in series to Tesla secondary coil before grounding. Closed loop kills dipole - in your case too..

P.S> About copper pipe - you need to make folded plate from pipe what makes coil from it. Then you can attatch lightbulb and maybe grounding to this coil ends.

So now I do not know how to go on as I have TV flyback units...but I lack the old schematics hence not easy to locate the correct connections.
Roberto

Please see first minutes of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7jbUA6_10c for how everything is connected together.
Good luck!

[jbignes5]

 Everyone has their opinion and refuse to do it themselves. The first thing I would like to address is that as soon as you hook anything that we use currently for measurement it changes the whole unit's resonance. This is due to the delicate balance these circuits seem to have. As soon as you put the resistance in the circuit it unbalances the whole thing.


The second thing is this, If you take the slayer exciter it is not the waves you want. The waves that are produced by a transistor are not true pulses. They are half cycles. This will never work. The ones who are doing spark gaps must also find a way to make them true one way pulses. As far as I know the only way to do that is to magnetically quench the spark gap.


The final tip is this: using transformers to supply the exciter waves is very damaging to the coil if one does not use an oil filled transformer and it eats through the insulation. Sorry but you need a special oil filled transformer in order to make it short proof.


So I'm guessing no one read the Tesla links I provided. Tesla goes through all of this already and teaches you how not to get the results you are seeing here.


I also take specific note of the ones saying you've got nothing. Yet they want measurements knowing full well the devices we use for measurement pull anything you connect to them out of tolerance. Even if we did get one to work it would have to be part of the system forever. It has to be designed into them. In the case of analogue devices they would have to be oil filled to work without shorting out. Any coil exposed to the effect if it is not surrounded by oil will leak eventually and react to the environment via the atmosphere and burn the insulation.


Also I highly suggest static shielding in these experiments. Leaks will kill all effects after the main coil. Just simple aluminum foil wrapped around the wires would work and connected to nothing. This method was tested by Tesla and he even used small pieces overlapped to get the right shielding effect. Tesla also talked about shielding the wires until you wanted to work with the energy or expose it to the environment or feed it to a device made to work with the signal.


When you look at the special transformer that Tesla made with the bucking (normal coil) no core Bifilar overlap coils in series version he had to oil fill it and have special metal around the whole thing, this was also a static shield that contained the energy as well. In his investigation he didn't use it because he wanted to see the effects of a transformer like that not being shielded. He said it was ok to run without shielding but you get a little more bang for the buck when it is proper.

What Tesla was doing was charging a cap bank to a very high value then dumping that charge across a spark gap and firing into one side of the two part coil wound in normal fashion but split in the middle and flipped so that they are bucking. This did two things. Only one half of the coil actually received the shot from the spark gap. Once that coil got to max it was inducing a reflection of itself + the original shot through it in the other half of the coil. This is like shooting a gun into the perfect spring mechanism. The Bifilar over wrap was merely a polar aligner and turned all induced voltages into the one way adding them together with all the ringing as well.

Speaking about oil filled coils Tesla also tried using the spark gap as an oil filled device but it didn't work as well as the quenched gap.

Tesla also talks about a device to detect the perfectly undamped(unaffected) waves. The bolometer. But it had to be improved by changing the detector part with a resistive mass very very small. He says a million times smaller then the bolometer had then he could even detect the disturbances from weather as well without blowing the meter. Heh Now thats sensitive!