Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 408 Guests are viewing this topic.

phoneboy

Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like stivep' s doing a Mislavskij variant.  Can't wait to see how it works out.  I began studying it when they came out with the yolk device (same principle).  Mine's a bit diff as you can pump the cap twice from a separate circuit on the same core. Will post once all the parts come in and it's wired up (if it works?).

verpies

Quote from: Magluvin on January 02, 2012, 09:26:15 PM
The windings seem to be  arranged different from drawing to picture.

It's just a matter of the size of the windings.  Except for fringing, the magnetic field, that they produce, is the same
Notice, that when two colinear windings are enlarged, they merge into one long winding.

I drew it this way to expose the middle of the device where all the action is.

wattsup

Quote from: FreeEnergyInfo on January 02, 2012, 05:24:31 PM
wiew...
www.realstrannik.ru/forum/28-efirnyj-generator/9682-obsuzhdenie-efirnogo-generatora-2.html?limit=18&start=3708

@FreeEnergyInfo

Thanks for posting the link to @tiger2007ify's last video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Sg-Dgtnmrk&feature=player_embedded

Since I do not speak Russian and I will not just use a software to translate to Russian and risk posting something unknowingly inaccurate or even possibly insulting, (lol), if anyone can please send the following drawing and text to him, I would appreciate it.

In his video, he shows a very nice Honey Comb Coil (HCC) that is energized via a bottom Pancake Coil (PC). On the PC he also has a feedback coil.

I would like to recommend that he try the Alternatives #1 and #2 as shown below.

Alternative #1:

Add a second PC below the original bottom PC and keep the feedback coil only on that first PC. Make sure the pulse switch is on the PC closest to the HCC.

Alternative #2:

Add a second pair of PCs on top of the HCC and keep the feedback coil only on that first bottom PC. So the pulse enters the bottom PC that is closest to the HCC, then goes to the lowest top PC closest to the HCC, then it goes to the top PC then to the bottom PC. 

He can try various connections methods but always using either two bottom PCs or two pairs of PCs as shown below.

What will this do?

Right now, I think his pulse is only energizing half of his PC.

If the pulse starts from the closest two PCs to the HCC then most of the pulse energy will be dissipated via those PCs. The two other PCs are there only to act as  supportive inductors but most of the action will occur in the first two PCs. With the same pulse energy he was using before, he should be able to pulse much more output from his HCCs. With such a set-up, he will need to use a variable pulse generator to sweep for the best frequency response that will produce the most output. A fixed pulse circuit like he is using now is like trying to find a needle in the haystack.

The other Alternative #3 (not shown) is to put a coil standing inside the center of the HCC and in series with PC or added to Alternative #1 and/or #2.

Think of it like the PC is a fish hook. The pulse is the nice fat worm on the hook. The HCC is a fish net. When the PC pulses it attracts ether (the fish) towards it and as the ether starts to align to the pancake coil, it passes through the HCC and gets caught inside of it.

Happy fishing.

wattsup

Ghazanfar_Ali

@Verpies. Thank you indeed Dear. I was following wrong procedure in finding the 50 T coil frequency. Now as per your procedure. My freqs where I am getting max peaks are. F1 (15 T) is 10.4 MHz. F2 is 100KHz. But again F3 once set to 50 Hz I play with F2 and F3 there is no amplification at bifillar coil. :( May be my toroid does not support NMR. :). Well I m going to wind another type of toroid already cut into two halves by me and see what happens.
But I really appreciate your guidance it is quite helpful to me. By the way the amplifier stage which u showed which comprises two transisters and also acts as a buffer stage, What do u suggest 2n2222 will serve the purpose with vcc 5V to 9V. or should i go for 2n3055 ?
I also replicated tomB455 KapGen. It produced very fine spark but only at full 220 V input. powered on my 1 x 60 W Bulb to 50% intensity. (Although I was expecting that bulb will explode) and then burnt up transformer of my variac. And once I touched my 220 V input wire it was hot. And then I noted my electric meter reading which counts my home's electricity units and I came to know that my Kapgen has eaten lot of Amps. I then didnt power it on. I know its coil is not tuned to resonance freq produced due to spark gap. How do I tune it without a high voltage test eqpt. I had an Idea that if I disconnect the coil stage from spark gap. And connect a rod as antenna is series with spark gap at the end instead of coils tube. And then power it on and use my spectrum analyzer at a safety distance which is of 200 MHz band to see the exact freq of the spark gap. Then make coil for that frequency. But I dont know the mathematics to find turn ratio of primary coil (which is in Tomb455's case is 85 turns and then 25 turns backward) and secondary coil which is 7 turns in his case. Can u give some guideline or mathematical calculation to get no of turns for the coils if frequency is found from spark gap. Is my procedure of finding freq from spark gap is correct?
Waiting for your reply.
Thanks.


verpies

Quote from: Ghazanfar_Ali on January 03, 2012, 04:11:59 PM
@Verpies. Thank you indeed Dear. I was following wrong procedure in finding the 50 T coil frequency. Now as per your procedure. My freqs where I am getting max peaks are. F1 (15 T) is 10.4 MHz. F2 is 100KHz. But again F3 once set to 50 Hz I play with F2 and F3 there is no amplification at bifillar coil. :( May be my toroid does not support NMR. :) . Well I m going to wind another type of toroid already cut into two halves by me and see what happens.

But I really appreciate your guidance it is quite helpful to me. By the way the amplifier stage which u showed which comprises two transistors and also acts as a buffer stage, What do u suggest 2n2222 will serve the purpose with vcc 5V to 9V. or should i go for 2n3055 ?

I also replicated tomB455 KapGen. It produced very fine spark but only at full 220 V input. powered on my 1 x 60 W Bulb to 50% intensity. (Although I was expecting that bulb will explode) and then burnt up transformer of my variac. And once I touched my 220 V input wire it was hot. And then I noted my electric meter reading which counts my home's electricity units and I came to know that my Kapgen has eaten lot of Amps. I then didnt power it on. I know its coil is not tuned to resonance freq produced due to spark gap. How do I tune it without a high voltage test equipt. I had an Idea that if I disconnect the coil stage from spark gap. And connect a rod as antenna is series with spark gap at the end instead of coils tube. And then power it on and use my spectrum analyzer at a safety distance which is of 200 MHz band to see the exact freq of the spark gap. Then make coil for that frequency. But I dont know the mathematics to find turn ratio of primary coil (which is in Tomb455's case is 85 turns and then 25 turns backward) and secondary coil which is 7 turns in his case. Can u give some guideline or mathematical calculation to get no of turns for the coils if frequency is found from spark gap. Is my procedure of finding freq from spark gap is correct?

I did not create the tuning procedure appearing in Reply #9510.
I only rephrased it in proper English and added the words in blue color.
I also added the questions in red color in order to clear up the ambiguities for everyone.  However none of the members of the STAAAR team never cared to answer them (nor to approve the words in blue color)

Everybody had the problem with ~50Hz signal.  Especially the low impedance that the windings present at this frequency.  Maybe it is a matter of the chemical composition of core material (or its conical shape) and maybe the problem is in the tuning procedure.
Note that the instructions specifically state to avoid the ringing frequency.  This frequency is the resonant frequency of the LC system or the frequency of the reflected wave oscillation.
This might seem counterintuitive but it makes sense if you think about it.  Note that at resonance the phase difference between the supply current and the winding current, is at minimum.  This could be bad if the goal is to create a rotating magnetic field which requires a large phase difference between the current in the 1-turn transverse winding and another perpendicular winding. (optimum is 90 degrees)
It makes sense that the F1 and F2 should be detuned a little off the resonance in order to maximize this phase difference. See the Reply #9025 for a detailed analysis of this issue.

Regarding the half-bridge buffer you can use any matched pair of PNP and NPN bipolar transistors as long as they are rated well above the frequency that you are trying to amplify or buffer. 
Remember that the half-bridge circuit is not good enough for boosting non-digital waveforms. e.g. sine, triangle, sawtooth waves, because of the crossover distortion.  However it works well for digital rectangular AC waveforms.
For bipolar amplification you should supply the half-bridge with at least +12VDC and -12VDC, e.g. with two 12V batteries in series, totaling 24V.  The common wire connecting these two batteries should be hooked up to your AC signal generator's ground.
Also adjust-down the output of your signal generator at first, so you don't damage the bases of these transistors.

Regarding the HV Tube devices (a la Tesla coil resonant transformers).  I do not find them to be unusual, thus I will direct you to other sources:
http://blazelabs.com/e-exp16.asp
http://www.overunity.com/10517/standing-wave-coil-frequency/