Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[duff]

The 5 wire parallel wind could be modified to all series to resemble more of a Rodin Coil set-up so that the SG1 spark energy can recirculated more times inside the output coil. Also, another Caduceus Coil wound with tighter turns (as we have seen others try with the TK coils) would concentrate this energy more then it is doing now. There are many ways to play around with the CC winds to find the most effective method and hopefully be so much more efficient so that the SG1 stage could be driven with much lower energy.

The reason for the 5 wire parallel winding of the caduceus is to create the least resistance & inductance for the primary winding.

Regarding the caduceus
T1000 states:
   "Because we use it as Tesla Coil primary"

Regarding the Tesla Coil primary
T000 states (Post 10117):
   "Primary coil length has lowest impedance and inductance as
    possible.   That dictates the length of secondary coil and the
   secondary coil is 1/4 of resonant wave length."

[dllabarre]

@dllabarre

Please do not forget.

wattsup

I can't find the larger picture.
All I can find is this one of a close-up.


If you don't feel this is the inside of Green Box then just ignore my post.  I'm not going to divert this thread because someone disagrees with me.


DonL

[TEKTRON]

I can't find the larger picture.
All I can find is this one of a close-up.


If you don't feel this is the inside of Green Box then just ignore my post.  I'm not going to divert this thread because someone disagrees with me.


DonL

Don, I rotated the inside view to get a better perspective. 

[andrea]

Very, very long thread. I have a question: someone has been successful in replicating the device? Was the COP really overunity? Thanks, if anyone can answer clearly.

[verpies]

Very, very long thread. I have a question: someone has been successful in replicating the device? Was the COP really overunity? Thanks, if anyone can answer clearly.

There were many devices discussed in this thread, so I don't know which one you have in mind.

Most of the devices here did not have their Input/Output power measured or it was measured very improperly. See Reply #9256
Many uneducated people wrongly think that if they multiply average volts and amps then the result will be watts (power).
This is the result of most of the false OU positives.

There was one device, called the STAAAR Yoke device, that was powered by two low power signal generators, which according to their specs together were capable of delivering maximum of 10Watts of input power, but an incandescent light bulb connected to the output of the device was radiating visible light seemingly in excess of 10W (authors claimed over 100W).  See: Reply #10031

Unfortunately the tuning of the Yoke device was very difficult and the inventors (STAAAR team) never made the effort to clarify their tuning procedure. See: Reply #10147

Several independent people replicated the STAAAR's Yoke device but failed to make it work due to different ferrimagnetic core or unclear tuning procedure.