Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[dole]

Hi,
In a daily delusion, conspiracy suspicion, experimenting and replicating day and nights without results,
I may post this link in a hope, somehow to go back and find what we have been missing and how.
Story is not new but there must be some unspoken words behind it, and it is still puzzle invite to hack.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqiRoKy0Gyo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbmFcGhTnS0

d.

[jbignes5]

@jbignes5

Thanks for the reply. I did read about the ionizers here(  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_ioniser) before you posted the web address. But I still don't know what kind of ionizer cHenriques is using in his setup.  You said "Ionisers use electrostatically charged plates to produce positively or negatively charged gas ions that particulate matter sticks to (in an effect similar to static electricity)."

OK, so what is it?  Is it a tube, a diy gizmo? I have spend lots of time google'ing this with out a satisfactory result..

Best..

Ok well read that page a few dozen times especially where they say "electrostatic LIKE" They are not the same even though they do seem to act the same. Tesla was very intrigued with this static like emissions he was seeing. Even he says that his special transformer produces effects like the best static machines of the day. But he also said static like. So there it is. Static is highly charged objects or particles and this stuff is something much different. More like organized static. The problem is that it uses the medium that everything is floating in. Whatever that may be it is highly mobile and the fastest substance in the Universe.


You could think of this stuff as the opposite to energy. It is what is in between energy. It is what divides energy and creates flows of all kinds from that division. Although I highly doubt Tesla or any of us can directly control this substance you can coax it by the use of energy emissions, like the Tesla effect. Just like ripples in a pond this stuff moves also and once started to move it will go forever. The only thing I can think of is that the extreme density change from the disruptive discharges caused 3d ripple like responses in the form of an expanding sphere. The ripples are extreme density changes of energy. Also as Tesla figured out one can change the shape of the disruptive discharge and focus it even more.

[wattsup]

@ronotte

I gave Bob the green light and the green backs and asked them to concentrate their work on the DR unit.

As well, today I received the two standard flybacks from his company. They shipped it fast. Now to put in in the place of my previous flyback and start playing around. I will keep the primary as they have wound it single. They are using Litz wire for the primary. I wonder why. Possible they see the pulses as creating a high level of skin effect that is lost with a single strand wire. I think this Litz question needs to be considered by others who wind their own primary.

I am putting two photos below. One with the two flybacks and another showing my big diodes in full rectified with my HV caps in series.

My present set-up is using the Tesla Ozone Patent method.

Hope these new flybacks have more punch since now the HV coil is solitary.

Time for more playing around

wattsup

Added:

Regarding the DR unit Hv coil, Bob indicated that making 30 turns in all the layers is not possible in the art of winding. He suggested starting at 35 or 36 turns and as the layer increase, the turns will decrease. This is in accordance with the art of HV coil winding. I told him to do it the best way they know so the final turns, although will be the same numbers but not equal per layer.

[jbignes5]

@ronotte

I gave Bob the green light and the green backs and asked them to concentrate their work on the DR unit.

As well, today I received the two standard flybacks from his company. They shipped it fast. Now to put in in the place of my previous flyback and start playing around. I will keep the primary as they have wound it single. They are using Litz wire for the primary. I wonder why. Possible they see the pulses as creating a high level of skin effect that is lost with a single strand wire. I think this Litz question needs to be considered by others who wind their own primary.

I am putting two photos below. One with the two flybacks and another showing my big diodes in full rectified with my HV caps in series.

My present set-up is using the Tesla Ozone Patent method.

Hope these new flybacks have more punch since now the HV coil is solitary.

Time for more playing around

wattsup

Added:

Regarding the DR unit Hv coil, Bob indicated that making 30 turns in all the layers is not possible in the art of winding. He suggested starting at 35 or 36 turns and as the layer increase, the turns will decrease. This is in accordance with the art of HV coil winding. I told him to do it the best way they know so the final turns, although will be the same numbers but not equal per layer.

Please understand that ozone is very dangerous. When you said in the Tesla ozone patent what did you mean exactly?

[ronotte]

Hi wattsup,

awesome , finally I see that you are getting what you wanted since long time ago. I'm really happy for you as I'm sure you'll be able to perform safely the many waiting experiments. I think it would be also interesting if you will post the flyback circuit you are using. For this purpose it'd be also interesting to make a comparison between the standard Royer, the one/two BJT possible oscillators and the Bob's suggested circuits. All to understand the best solution both in terms of safety and possible trade off between the power needed and the available output frequency/voltage.
Are you equipped with current/HV probes? If not, the best way should be that to provide  a compensated :100 compensated divider for the output and a small series resistor for the battery connection.

Certainly having all the correct building blocks at hand makes it very simple to assemble the 'Ozone patent'. I thought many times to do the same but there is always a problem (now the flu)...that's the reason slowing my WNG's 'generator' wiring: the important anyway is that I've all the necessary components in front of me

I'm very happy if the flyback 'DR kind' will have soon an end. As I told you I'm very curious (as all of us) to see said implementation at work. As you hypothesized the Litz wire is superior for HF operation but there are differences on technology: please check if the Litz you intend to use  has been assembled with parallel or twisted single wires!!  ...lot of differences. Again, in our case the higher the operating frequency the better the efficiency. Winding the HV coils using Litz wire should be the best...but it will soon exaust the available space as the silk wire needs more space...so there is a trade off that only Bob's able to solve. I suggest to leave to him decisions about layer strategy.

Ciao
Roberto