Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 526 Guests are viewing this topic.

captainkt

@frantz, nearly all Kapanadze devises have two stages of start up. Possibly due to both HV and LV being used. When I am experimenting my devices do not simply start up without some switching or fiddling to get spark gap working.Also I would not expect device to stop instantly if it did then I would be suspicious.
Regards
captainkt

jbignes5

On almost all of his videos there is the temporary source applied to the device then 10 seconds of charging like action then removal of the source. Cap? or static capacitor oh wait they are the same... A laden jar is the device that either can be used for electricity and or static. Hmm. Never really thought about static from the thin air. When using those kinds of oscillations some static effects would be happening to the air and matter. Hmmm

Wouldn't the crossing of two same static sources through a polarization field change the polarization of that same field simply by the direction the wire is fed through the fields?

Is this the same technique they are using to organize the static they get from the Testastika. Except they use magnets or coils to polarize the static to either polarity to make it useful high voltage to be stepped down to add real current to it. This could be compared to the Avramenko plug type of a setup. Just separating the positive from the negative would do this and thats what the Avramenko plug does.

Some more good research:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCTkGgKZDKA&feature=related

I told you silicon won't work for this system. Thats why Tesla used a spark gap! Silicon is to sensitive to static electricity anyways.

Would this make my idea of using the magamp to switch the input a valid idea with merit then?

Hmm some interesting stuff about static and silicon. http://static.usenix.org/publications/login/2009-10/openpdfs/vandrunen.pdf

Hmm interestingly.. "If you need to ship ESD devices, use ESD-protective bags or wrap them in aluminum foil and put them in an antistatic plastic bag. Note that if there is a battery on the board you should not use aluminum foil, as you may short-circuit things"

Aluminum?? Tesla liked aluminum...

And this about jfet's:  http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_6/chpt_5/9.html

Some tid bits on static and electric lines:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puTZvhOFpRA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=WcSSWN4Tnoo

This was not entirely related but has to do with plasma and lasers. Pay attention to the ball of plasma they make and the curious pattern the ball was making on the wall. You could think of it as looking through the center axis of the plasma ball with the laser light being bent while going trough the plasma.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=jBjqT3AQkH0

forest

Quote from: verpies on June 11, 2012, 04:48:50 AM
Do you mean ?:
1) "switching" the absolute permeability of the core (μ = B/H) as in a Reluctance Switch or Flux Switch
2) "switching" the differential/incremental permeability of the core (μÎ" = Î"B / Î"H) as in a Variable Inductive Reactance

I think only experiments with working unit will give answer. Personally I think more like reluctance switch but not exactly.
Some videos proved that rings used in sr913 device are permanently converted into magnets, then demagnetized and then again converted into magnet of opposite polarity. This effect is imho the direct cause of ou, very initial time of creating magnet and destroying it.

frantz

Quote from: jbignes5 on June 11, 2012, 09:21:30 AM
On almost all of his videos there is the temporary source applied to the device then 10 seconds of charging like action then removal of the source. Cap? or static capacitor oh wait they are the same... A laden jar is the device that either can be used for electricity and or static. Hmm. Never really thought about static from the thin air. When using those kinds of oscillations some static effects would be happening to the air and matter. Hmmm

Wouldn't the crossing of two same static sources through a polarization field change the polarization of that same field simply by the direction the wire is fed through the fields?

Is this the same technique they are using to organize the static they get from the Testastika. Except they use magnets or coils to polarize the static to either polarity to make it useful high voltage to be stepped down to add real current to it. This could be compared to the Avramenko plug type of a setup. Just separating the positive from the negative would do this and thats what the Avramenko plug does.


@jbignes5
do you have some idea how to do some kind of experiment?


yfree

Quote from: verpies on June 05, 2012, 01:01:21 PM
Zeitmaschine thinks that devices with ferromagnetic cores are a different class of devices and Kapanadze's devices do not work according to the principles described by McFreey
This can only mean that Zeitmaschine "hat den Artikel überhaupt nicht gelesen". :)