Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

You are right about the search coil, that is a good idea and can be made very small and would be the ideal antenna for a spectrum analyzer.

You are not right about the need for precise tuning of the receiver. At least in my system, there is a broad range of tolerance for the receiving capacitor and the receiving loop. The most power can be transferred at precise tunings of course .... but a lot can still be transferred even if you are off-peak, as long as the match isn't too bad, and with a couple of easily-changed receiver loops of different lengths a very broad range of possible frequencies can be accommodated. It takes less than a minute with a small screwdriver to switch receiving loops in my system.

IF such a system is being used, its transmission frequency cannot be too low, or everything metal will pick it up and get warm. It cannot be too high or the RF radiation will be powerful and easily detectable on simple shortwave radio receivers nearby. If I suspected RF or magnetic induction shenanigans, a low frequency RF spectrum analyzer would be the instrument of choice that I would bring along with me.
But from what I've read, nobody with such an instrument would ever be able to get close enough to a Kapanadze demonstration to use it.

I agree, low-Q LC circuits do not have a very narrow bandwidth.
I also think that the usable range of frequencies would not be very wide. Waddaya say to  16Hz - 30kHz ?

[a.king21]

Hi a.king21, I was interested in two output wires on the inside of the tube pass all or only one them?

I'll be posting more high quality photos of the device shortly.

[x_name-41]

I'll be posting more high quality photos of the device shortly.

Ok, thanks!

[FreeEnergyInfo]

I'll be posting more high quality photos of the device shortly.

www.realstrannik.ru/forum/39-kapanadze/69902-kapanadze-4.html?limit=18&start=1656#75877
THANKS THANKS
THANKS THANKS ....

[a.king21]

@ a.king21 and mike140366

I'm assuming that should you manage to work out how the device operates (with or without help from the members of this forum), it is your intention to pursue your previously described plan to commercialise the technology for general usage. Would you continue to open source your research up to and beyond this point? I personally have no problem with investors reaping reward from their investments and inventors gaining from their inventions (and at this point I suspect the $20k directly invested is more than anyone else who has published on this forum). However, I believe that it would be helpful for everyone to understand your approach up front.

Our approach is simple.
Build the device to a commercial standard and produce it in a way that does not imbalance the world economy.
So the technology would be introduced slowly - maybe as low energy devices first.
Of course you would be able to replicate the relevant components easily.
I have always open sourced. If you go back on my posts you will see that I
was making hints as much as I could, before being given the all clear.
Once we have patent protection there is no need to be secretive.
I talked with Magnacoaster the other day and they will allow anyone reasonable access to poke meters into
Richard Willis's devices.
Kapanadze simply does not understand the way business is done in the West. He thinks we were there to steal his technology.
What a pillock.
We had infinitely more to gain by working with him.
He is surrounded by thick people advising him stupidly.
It's like a mad hatters tea party trying to work with him.