Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[valibb]

It is posible to output power of the aquarium to be 700-1000V. I think, it is posible the heater to be modified. In normal condition, all three heater elements are put in parallel, but if you put elements in series you need high voltage. Hallogen heater use 30% less energy then normal heater.
The same is for bulbs. Hallogen elements have more fiabillity than normal elements. You can use over tension than normal use due higher resistivity. Nobody see how are bulbs connected in TK previous movies. Of course clampmeters indicate high amperage, but clampmeters can be easily manipulated to show what you want to show(more or less).
   This is why TK don't his invention to illuminate his house, he need to put in series more bulbs and interrupters will be destroyed afer first or second use.
And of course don't forget the inductance of heater elements...

[jbignes5]

@Zeitmaschine

I think you should forget the patent. Patents cost money. Money TK probably did not have on hand so he obviously had to find some investors. Those investors are the ones who probably insisted on patenting the device if they were to then finance any more advancements. Those investors probably did not know any of the technicals so TK just put up some nice reading points together and hatched a patent to satisfy them. But once they went over the actual patent and realized it really says nothing, protects nothing and their investment went to waste, all hell must have broken loose and TK was left to his on devices. Since then he is just surviving from on stink to the next because regardless of what he or the patent might say, investors only have one thing in mind, making billions on a ground floor opportunity, because investors are already conditioned in the mindset of "High Risk Reaps High Returns". Suckers.

About the logical part, that is my middle name.

Some of my logic differs from most because I take a different perspective on what the ether is. For me it is ether piling onto your energized coil that produces the magnetic field and not the coil that produces the field itself. From that perspective, most everything in the common EE makes more sense to me this way then the illogical stance it has taken for over 150 years thinking the coil is generating the field. For me there is no such thing as a field collapse. Only field release, because it is coming in from the outside of the coil and being released back to the outside of the coil. Otherwise explain to me how an outer field is so well trained to then re-enter the coil as field collapse. Anyways, I could go on and on about that but realize there is no point to try and overturn a rock, it will always be a rock on the other side. hehehe. But I am working on a major method of experiments to show these and prove it once and for all. We have been playing with ether since the first coil was energized and Faraday just had it wrong from the start. But that is only my opinion from a few years of "logical" questionings.

As far as spark being a decoy, that would fly right in the face of any "logical" OU endeavor since you are saying that this great spark is just a waste of energy to be used as a decoy. What OU device has so much power to waste as a decoy and still light up the load. That is not logical, nor practical.

wattsup

Lol this reminds me of the half empty crowd and the half full crowd. I think I would argue that there is no field inside of anything if we look at the rules for static electrical events. The matter is simply energized and the outside of the wire is the only moving fields. Weather those be magnetic or electric in nature. It also depends on what kind of field you choose. Magnetic seems to be different from the electric field in many ways. One being in distance from the wire. Orientation of the field lines are another difference where the electric field tends to go from the wire radially and the magnetic goes parallel to the wire which in my opinion one supports the other. Unless the magnetic is pulled into something that can channel it. This could also lend credence to Leedskalnins descriptions of magnetic current in the wires to a degree. With iron and ferrites being an attractive channel to the magnetic. Well more so then wires. It could be we have misinterpreted the magnetic which could be wholly internal current with the electric field which is wholly external. If we have done as such all fields external to the magnetic channels are electric in nature and the matter is what makes it magnetic by holding the field lines parallel to each other in the matter.


As to the spark issue. I don't think the spark is exactly the clue here. It is the gap that is important. The separation of the circuit is what converts the magnetic current into an electric field that then organizes itself to complete the circuit.


One clue to this is the very strange happenings of what Gray was working with. His power tube was an attempt to harvest the broadband emission of the spark gap and to create a screen that would strip the field collapse into a load(motor field and rotor coils).

Your view on the field of a coil is how I use to see it working but now it seems to me that the only thing we are seeing as an return impulse or BEMF is just the response of the environment that the electric field of the coil displaced when the coil was energized or pulsed. try understanding that the vacuum of space is a reverse pressure. Creating a bubble in the water for instance put a very large pressure on the surface of the bubble from the water surrounding it. In this case we are creating a bubble of a different sort and the pressure to collapse is huge but of a different nature then the bubble itself. So the response is very high voltage of the opposite qualities that effects the coil as the coils own field collapses.


I just wanted to pose a few alternative examples that might change your view a bit about what we are doing when we pulse coils.

[poynt99]

Sometimes for A reading attach small car lamp 12V, 1A and measure in series,
just to have any load and at 1200V setup I measured 550-600mA, but often I just
do it without load and than is 900-1100mA (1.1A).

Karlo,

Are you saying that your voltage and current measurements were obtained like this?:

1) Voltage measurement is taken open circuit (no load), with a voltage meter on DC volts.
2) Current measurement is taken with either a 2uF capacitor as a load, or a 12V 1A car lamp as load, or sometimes no load at all, just a short circuit through the DC ammeter. The current meter is in series and reading DC milliamps.

Is this correct?

[poynt99]

My last setup can gain 980 mA /1200V from 250mA / 12 V input from PC power supply with
help of backfeed.

Karlo,

Are you claiming a power gain of nearly 400 times?

i.e. 1176W / 3W = 392

[forest]

Be serious. How TK can connect this to his home electric system if this is high frequency DC not 50Hz 230V AC ? The best thing is I'm pretty sure it can be made safe to touch with better control !