Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 254 Guests are viewing this topic.

Zeitmaschine

Quote from: frantz on September 12, 2012, 01:56:16 AM
The big thing is a old Russian capacitors (not polar), I have a few at home. This is not a battery!!!!
Then he should replace these Russian capacitors with conventional ones (round type), then connect an incandescent light bulb (not fluorescent lamp) and then let it run for at least one hour in front of a video camera without cut. And not to forget to invite some reliable witnesses to this world-shaking event.

Regards

frantz

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on September 12, 2012, 06:20:14 AM
Then he should replace these Russian capacitors with conventional ones (round type), then connect an incandescent light bulb (not fluorescent lamp) and then let it run for at least one hour in front of a video camera without cut. And not to forget to invite some reliable witnesses to this world-shaking event.

Regards


Zeitmashine,
author spoke in first movie about problems with polar caps. He used non polar to device.
About rest of your opinion, I agree but we must to give some time for this man. He promised publish schems and rest of information about device.
Read this site:
http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/edward_lee/
On there you should to have fresh info.


Regards

Hoppy

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on September 12, 2012, 06:20:14 AM
Then he should replace these Russian capacitors with conventional ones (round type), then connect an incandescent light bulb (not fluorescent lamp) and then let it run for at least one hour in front of a video camera without cut. And not to forget to invite some reliable witnesses to this world-shaking event.

Regards

I agree, the load and run time need to be much greater to be convincing. Its far too easy to fake a demo with just a small flouro lamp as a load even without the big caps in the open air environment he is running the demo. With a more realistic load and run time and demo set up on a 'clean' table with the big caps replaced with much smaller ones, then we may have something to think seriously about.

Hoppy

frantz

Quote from: Hoppy on September 12, 2012, 06:53:33 AM
I agree, the load and run time need to be much greater to be convincing. Its far too easy to fake a demo with just a small flouro lamp as a load even without the big caps in the open air environment he is running the demo. With a more realistic load and run time and demo set up on a 'clean' table with the big caps replaced with much smaller ones, then we may have something to think seriously about.

Hoppy


Hoopy,
this caps have a several uF (8 or 10), only size of this caps are large. Capacitance is relatively small...
Give him a some time to publish data...
I know that everyone are impatient and waiting too long time but we must wait a little yet...


verpies

Quote from: yfree on September 11, 2012, 02:07:33 PM
Quote from: sparks on September 11, 2012, 09:16:15 AM
Your observation that TK devices rely on very highcurrent avalanche pulses are the equivalent of electron cascade events.  An electron cascade results when one electron is freed and accelerated by an electric field which results in a chain reaction of conversion of electron binding energy to kinetic energy.  The energy needed to initiate the electron cascade event is serveral magnitudes less than the resulting current and voltage produced.  Electron cascade events occur at the solid to gas interface in a spark gap. 
This is not true. The electron avalanche, as for instance created in the spark, does not provide or release additional energy.
Well, it seems that both of you agree that TK-type devices output high current pulses caused by some kind of avalanche effect.

I don't have enough info about Kapanadze's devices to claim that they output high current pulses, but if I assume that this is correct then it is plausible that these pulses are created by some kind of avalanche effect.  So in a way you can count me in as a proponent of this explanation.

The remaining question remains "What is it an avalanche of ?":
1) Avalanche of electrons colliding with electrons and producing more electrons
2) Avalanche of electrons colliding with ions and producing more electrons
3) Avalanche of electrons colliding with ions and producing more ions
4) Avalanche of ions colliding with ions and producing more ions
5) Avalanche of ions colliding with ions and producing more ions and electrons
6) Avalanche of electrons colliding with photons and producing more electrons
7) Avalanche of electrons colliding with positrons and producing more electrons
8) Avalanche of electrons colliding with precessing nuclei and producing more electrons
9) Avalanche of something else...

Pt.1-5 assumes the conversion of electron's binding energy into electron's kinetic energy. Such conversion has never been observed in physical and chemical reactions, most likely because the electron's binding energy is purely attractive and doesn't allow electrons to escape the nucleus easily.

In order for an electron to escape the nucleus, a significant external amount of energy has to be delivered to it in the form of kinetic, thermal or photonic energy as seen in the Møller Scattering or the Photoelectric Effect or the Photon Enhanced Thermionic Emission.
Vacuum tubes that use Thermionic Emission of electrons do not exhibit any electron avalanche effects nor any collective energy gain. There are many exothermic chemical reactions but none of them are exoelectronic, as far as I know.
All elastic electron scattering events do not change the collective energy of the entities participating in these scattering events - by definition.
Inelastic Scattering changes the collective energy of the participants but all the non-nuclears types of scattering, that I know of,  have not been observed to yield any net collective energy - they just convert one form of energy into another.

The only known inelastic scattering that converts mass to energy is the Deep Inelastic Scattering, as far as I know, and even in this type of conversion the total energy is conserved if E=mc2 is considered. This might be hapenning in the pt.8 avalanche.
The contemporary science has not yet investigated thoroughly if polarizing the nuclear spin and precessing the nuclei (e.g.: by NMR) makes the nuclei more susceptible to Deep Inelastic Scattering, than regular non-polarized nuclei.
However some experiments suggest that this might be the case.