Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Zeitmaschine]

Since the device we have been looking at (coil within the coil) has a spark gap it could be easily concluded that this action is attracting charged particles into the gap and then released into the radiator coil or thick copper coil. This is a very simple action and what tK was referring to as the simple method.

On the other hand it could be concluded that the whole thing with the TK spark gap and the TK helical coil is fake.

In the 2004 video at 17:31 the spark is visible. At 17:54 the clamp-on ammeter shows 0.5 amps (up to 0.6 amps) while the lamps are on, so the device seems fully functional.

Then at 20:44 there is no visible spark but nevertheless all five 1000 watt lamps are brightly lit as seen before while the clamp-on ammeter shows only 0.3 amps at 21:05. Hence the conclusion can only be that the device now is not fully working. In fact the high voltage generator seems to be off, so the device consumes only around half the input power as before. Strangely this does not affect the power output to the lamps.

Now, if the spark has no vital function (as it seems) then the helical coil has no function, then the two transistors on the heat sinks have no function, then the cables on the bobbin have most likely also no function. Then the energy has to be generated by that what is left, and that is not quite much.

Holmes: "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"

Free Energy from an old Sadolin can is highly improbable, but nevertheless it must be the truth.

[wattsup]

Since both device are similar, but yet different..  I have created new thread called "Kapanadze Cousin - DALY FREE ENERGY" for Dally related posts.
it is located here: >http://www.overunity.com/solid-state-devices/<

@27Bubba

Good move. We will follow it there. Others may want to migrate their post here to there to get it going.

All those devices got same building blocks: One signal for transformer and second signal for causing havoc and making OU conditions.
So you need to learn this bit then there will be much more convienent way to explain how all those devices work.
P.S> Also I copied my previous posts into Dally thread.

@T-1000

I am really happy to read the word "havoc". Seems like I have used this word since 5 years now and at least someone else is using it. So you are saying there are two signals. So if we look at the Aq2 unit, let's try to extrapolate.

1) One signal to drive the transformer. This would be the signal sent to the triple transformer primary that feeds the HV+ to the TKc.

2) One signal to create the havoc causing OU conditions. If this is to be considered in the physicality of the Aq2 device, the only place there is room for a second signal is the two other triple transformer coils but knowing which end is used for the signal will be the difficult part. Given that all three transformers have their mid-range coils in parallel and given the HV- of the output coil is going to those parallel coils, this is a good way to create the havoc as I had referred to in one of my past posts.

But those two transformer HV+ lines are going to the coily coils (CoCo) where we know the center coil is grounded on one end and the other end we do not see. It is possible that one line of the center coil is going to the CoCo and/or also inside the TKc pipe to connect to the coax. It is too bad the @a.king21 group never looked inside the TKc pipe. They could have a small spark gap inside there as I have found that at certain frequencies, a spark gap enables lighting of the output bulb. But this is all preliminary.

Also, I have done some tests with two HV flyback on the coax build and have not been able to create the havoc condition as yet but will be trying more methods tonight. The only thing is I always am trying to respect the limitations of the Aq2 build and potential connection methods. Right now I am concentrating on the TKc as seen wound with one coax line as we know it. I am trying to see what makes it tick.

I will make a youtube soon to show some of this.

Also, if you can find anyone in Russia that has the specs for the triple transformer, this would be the greatest help in advancing our understanding as it would enable us to make a much tighter set of working principles that we could then work to recreate on the bench as isolated trials.

@Zeitmaschine

Just saw you post. I will look at it and investigate.

wattsup

[cheappower2012]

@Zeitmaschine
,very correct,the coils,hv,spark gap and ground do nothing its to hid the real device
and pretend its a Tesla invention.This forum is going into chaos
as it is going with,its a Tesla invention are you blind,its a fraud can't you see,
this is just like TK's device,its magic,the blind leading the blind.You have already seen the real component,the strange transformer,
can you cross the bridge,"how can the wire of a transformer that can at most pass 1 amp,pass 9 amps and not burn up".
If you can't pass this then you go in a circle,as is happening here.

[jbignes5]

On the other hand it could be concluded that the whole thing with the TK spark gap and the TK helical coil is fake.

In the 2004 video at 17:31 the spark is visible. At 17:54 the clamp-on ammeter shows 0.5 amps (up to 0.6 amps) while the lamps are on, so the device seems fully functional.

Then at 20:44 there is no visible spark but nevertheless all five 1000 watt lamps are brightly lit as seen before while the clamp-on ammeter shows only 0.3 amps at 21:05. Hence the conclusion can only be that the device now is not fully working. In fact the high voltage generator seems to be off, so the device consumes only around half the input power as before. Strangely this does not affect the power output to the lamps.

Now, if the spark has no vital function (as it seems) then the helical coil has no function, then the two transistors on the heat sinks have no function, then the cables on the bobbin have most likely also no function. Then the energy has to be generated by that what is left, and that is not quite much.

Holmes: "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"

Free Energy from an old Sadolin can is highly improbable, but nevertheless it must be the truth.

What it is, is this. What is the frame rate off the camera showing the video? Duh 30 hz max. In fact the video was processed by youtube and you think this is the whole truth. Listen buddy if you don't know about frame rates and how they mess with frequency visuals then you are a moron at best proving absolutely nothing on your assumption and lame attempts to discredit this process.


Has everyone gone bananas? The first thing is that the video is already poor quality and then to boot you go through the compression of youtube which also messes with the frame rates and quality further. You have proved nothing in your assumptions absolutely nothing.


Why do I have to bring up the most obvious things because you think everyone is so idiotic like you? Why exactly do you think we see video smearing stripes coming from leds when captured by a newer video camera? Do you actually think the smearing stripe is really there?


What is fake is the obvious attempt of some of the members to discredit this device by fraud. You are frauding the rest of us by even suggesting that what you have shown is proof.


Let me show you something ok...


Rather poor quality video with time laps at the end to show the sounds of sparks but almost no ignition of the water on the video end:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bMZ_pD-Jug


So please stop with trying to say the spark ends after a point. It doesn't. It just isn't within the frame rate of the camera that was capturing it and of course then you add youtube compression and processing as well..


If you think this is a fraud then *points at the forum main link* You know where to go... Stop with this constant bashing and leave the research to the ones who think it is very credible.


P.S. I'm sorry for using words like moron and stupid but I am getting very tired of all this junk science you guys fling and say it is credible proof. It proves NOTHING.

[wattsup]

@Zeitmaschine

I am verifying what you just posted but I have one major problem.

My 2004 video only goes up to 14:16 so I don't know where you got video up to the 17:?? mark.

Could you please point me to the youtube of the one you are using.

@cheappower2012

We are all here for the truth so don't go around calling people blind. Blind is when someone refuses to be open to all the possibilities. Every time a @member reports any anomaly you just pounce and post this stuff but it is nothing new. Bring us some facts.

We are not all absolute authorities on what a wire can or cannot handle. There is a question of frequency. At 60Hz, yes, that wire should toast, but at higher frequencies, neither I nor you are any authority to just dismiss something as an impossibility without hard facts. So I invite you to plan and do a comparison study of the same energy through a wire, one at 60Hz and another at 5kHz and another at 10kHz and show us the facts. Then, if you are right, you can spread your gospel.

@jbignes5

No need to  lose your cool, since @Zeitmaschine brings in a good observation that needs to be clarified without jumping to conclusions. Yes the videos are crap and that is the reality. What else is new.

wattsup