Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[27Bubba]

Post by "bass" translated by Google translate..

I have a question.
Reading on the resonance theory, in particular the resonance voltage, where it says that the inductor current to power ahead of pi / 2.
Active power P (active power = real power = true power) is measured in watts (W, W) and it is this power that is consumed by the electrical resistance of the heat and useful work. For ac:

P = U * I * cosφ, where U and I - action = efficiency = rms voltage and current, and φ-phase shift between them

Reactive power Q (reactive power) is measured in volt-amperes reactive (var, var) and an electromagnetic power, which is stored and given back to the grid oscillator circuit system. Reactive power ideally does not work, that is the name is misleading. It is easy to guess looking at the picture, that:

P = U * I * sinφ, where U and I - action = efficiency = rms voltage and current, and φ-phase shift between them

cos (pi / 2) = 0
sin (pi / 2) = 1
Hence, on the inductive reactive power is equal to the product of current and voltage is maximum, and the active is 0.
They write that the reactive power in the ideal does not work, but in his lectures on TBE again write that at resonance burning transformers and inductors, and other terrible things.
Hence the question: if the reactive power in the ideal does not work, why burn transformers?
Or I do not understand it all right?

What else is interesting.
Has anyone ever delved into the way of the reactive power compensation?

And what it is. For example write:
"The circuits with purely resistive load current is flowing ahead and lagging the voltage. With inductive load current lags the voltage, the capacitance - leads the voltage. When the electric motors, compressors, solenoids, etc., the most typical of most consumer load inductive and has a total power consumption of reactive power is present. in this case decreases the power factor and to improve it, you should connect a capacitive load, which compensates for the inductive component. resulting load approaches the pure active power factor and takes the maximum value. "
Ie load-inductance. Let's see how to include capacitors for power factor correction
Add to the circuit inductance of the load-
In fact, we have formed a parallel tuned circuit!
Now what say?
In the load inductance walks reactive current, but it does not work?

[bass]

27Bubba
Thanks

If we compare where Kapanadze remembered Melnichenko, then at that time on the Internet and on television was just the video where Melnichenko is powered by battery-inverter a homemade fan connected to it via a capacitor (ie created series resonance using the inductance of the motor windings).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPm_TbwmwU4

Kapanadze said - Melnichenko should develop his idea. And according to this idea, in my opinion, went Kapanadze.

[br549]

QUOTE:
I would like more details on your setup, mainly the transformers (specs, source) and the HV DC source providing 2000v.
You don't show the polarity of the HV DC supply, what is the polarity?

---To:--aether22
This is the transformer information.
4-12V-3A4398   -   12V 3A Secondary. 115/230VAC 60Hz Primary. (HT-4398) Open frame, 2x2.7x2.2, 4 lbs sh. (L2F-4) Unused
$7.95 each
You can purchase them at:   https://www.fairradio.com/catalog.php?mode=view&categoryid=1546
- As far as the HV polarity: It only work one way. If you don't get the effect one way, then just swap the
   polarity. If needed I can do a drawing showing the transformer wire colors and connections (of the one I
   am using) . As far as the HV supply, I am using a 2000 vdc supply.  It takes about 1 second for the
   power supply to recharge to 2000 volts and discharge across the spark gap,  So I get a HV pulse about
   one time per. second. Currently  I just am letting it randomly spark, and eventually it sparks at the right
   time.

[Black_Bird]

It seems to me that br549 experiment and Dally device have a lot in common:

Both use an excited resonant transformer.
Both use a high voltage pulse to obtain the result.

The main difference is that  br549 device uses an iron core while Dally's uses air core.

[Vortex1]

The circuit I tested this morning shown below is a simplified version of br549's circuit.

I was able to get the same waveforms, and upon close inspection, the distorted waveform shows the transformer goes in and out of saturation.

All that is needed is a DC bias on the core to nudge it into saturation, the pulse does exactly that.

If no further pulses are applied it will snap  back to the low brightness state after a second or two.

Power drain shows a marked increase when in saturation and the transformer hums. (don't leave it on too long it will burn out)

You can test the circuit without the HV DC supply, and simply use a diode and resistor to bias the core as is commonly used in magamp control. A brief touch will bias the core into saturation.