Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

What happens if a transformer's core is near saturation so the magnetic flux can just travel from the primary to the secondary coil, but the magnetic flux created by the current in the secondary coil saturates the core completely.

Mr Lenz wrote that the current in a secondary will generate an opposing flux that will maintain the existing flux level created by the primary. Thus the flux created by the secondary will not add to the existing flux - it will oppose it.  However increasing the current in the primary, will saturate the core eventually. Such saturation will decrease core's differential permeability.

[bass]

The AC voltage can be ordinary 220V/50Hz

I agree with you

[jbignes5]

I agree with you

Not only agree but it was done by TK. Both battery and wall power was used in the second video in the house. Even though the sparking effect was less with wall power it still worked.


When I read up on this Physics of the fuelless generator I was so intrigued when I got to the part of the header of displacement current. It talks about the Tesla pancake coil and how it is much like the fuelless air condenser that tesla made. The bifilar design really struck a cord. This is sort of the same way the bifilar coil works if setup and used properly. The coil can and will act like a capacitor. It's ability to oscillate is greatly enhanced by the inherent capacity in the bifilar winds. This negates the reactive portion of the coil and allows for acceleration of the current entering the coil. This acceleration has the same effect as changing the gauge of a hose. The current lowers and the voltage potential rises.

One clue to how important the pancake coil is to the methods of Tesla is this picture.

So getting back to the idea of the underwater container idea we are left with the impression that he indeed was able to create a huge pressure field(electric field) and the stuff he was letting in was what had been pulled into this electric field (Free charges). Now all he needed was a way to drain those charges away from that field or create a sink (ground) for the charges to flow into. This was exactly what Tesla did in every experiment with wireless power. As long as he was in the field any time he made a path to ground with a device attached the free charges flowed through the device powering it as it sank the free charges in that field into the ground.

Once Tk got this method down he started to figure out other ways to create sinks or voids of charges and how to allow the free charges in the field he was creating to flow into that sink and generate free energy from that movement.

As I was reading it looks like others have figured this out long ago.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/78882094/Tesla-Sekrety

[wattsup]

@Zeitmaschine

I think I figured out where some of the confusion is coming from about the heat sink component. In the 2004 the component is not the same as in the Green Box.

Also, in the 2004 video I have seen the third wire although very difficultly but there is no other reason for that white wire but to be the ground. We cannot see better but the ground wire from the furthest heat sink goes to the nearest heat sink then a black wire goes inside the tin can.

But here are two images. One of 2004 transistor very poor quality but just look at the size and compare it to other image of Greenbox transistor size. Seems like the 2004 is using TO-3 with thin wires and the Greenbox is using TO-66 with thicker wires.

They probably blew the 2004 components and replaced them in the Green Box one.

About the 2004.

The diode plate is receiving AC that is rectified to create a DC biasing inside the main transformer that is creating an amplified effect on the AC5 line and this loop is created to draw output. The AC10 line that comes from the tin can to the rectifier is probably in parallel with the load.

The 2004 load has to be perfectly matched to the output to not take too much juice but just enough and leave some juice to drive the diode plate back to feed. If the load is too small, the transistors will heat up because the AC10 line is getting the remaining juice pushed through the diode plate. If the load is to big, the diode plate will not receive enough juice to cause adequate recoil and the transistors will run very cool (if at all). When the load is just right the transistor will run normally hot but output and recoil will be strong and steady.

So I think the AC10 line feeding the rectifier is connected in parallel to the load and this makes the device more of a self-regulating device where the recoil is a percentage of the load. Increased load decreases recoil and decreased load increases recoil. So you have to find the right load for each device. Too much load during experiments and you may never see the effect. You are better off starting with a small load and if transistors heat up too much, then increase load. It's working intuitively backwards fro conventional more load more heat designs.

The main question is about the two transistors. Where in the circuit should they go if you have AC feed. That capacitor we see in the 2004 video is way to big to act on a transistor base for a certain pulse frequency. Is it possible that the AC feed supplies the bases itself via a few resistors (to lower the feed to base versus feed throughput) is driving the transistor base at 60Hz and the feed throughput enters the tin can then goes through each transistor then to the diode plate parallel to load? These are going to have to be tested to find out.

OK, enough is enough. I have had it with looking at these vids. Now its time to experiment. I concede the heat sinks hold transistors and their sizes differ and that is why I was having a hard time reconciling them as a three wire device.

I would like to thank you for your kind persistence and trust we will learn more avenues as time goes on.

wattsup

[forest]

wattsup

I agree with statement there are  transistors there and collector is probably on heatsinks. Can you draw again your schematic with corrections ?