Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 354 Guests are viewing this topic.

jbignes5

Quote from: verpies on October 03, 2012, 08:06:12 PM
No, I allow for the possibility.
Hero bashing or hero worship is not included in the scientific method.
Win what?


You don't allow for anything outside of you limited view. That is a fact. When faced with the truth you insinuate that it was faked First or How did you put it?
"So the artificial earthquake story is fake or it was accomplished via other means than mechanical resonance."
or It could have been electromechanical which is the explanation of Tesla himself.

There is no hero worship here. Some just recognize the truth when it is experimentally expanded upon.

Of course you will never see this message because the truth hurts don't it. Block me how you wish I can and will say the truth when you soo blindly lie.

The show you talked about did it and confirmed they could set up vibrations in a bridge or building very easily. They did it. You lied.

frankidel

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on October 03, 2012, 03:25:28 PM
There is no inductive load (motor) connected in this video, only some heaters

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKFW1uwLN3U

nevertheless the caps are still there.

How do I know the caps are connected in this video? Because they are hard-wired (no plugs, no switches, one wire is even cut because of this). Now supposed the caps are there to compensate the inductive load of a motor and TK knows he will connect and disconnect a motor (or even a few different motors) during the presentation. Then why has he hard-wired these capacitors, so he can't change them (the capacity) quickly without the use of a screwdriver (or a knife)?

Therefore, why should heaters as load (with no L) need a bank of capacitors?

why should heaters need caps, maybe Kapa is only looking for current, not voltage, so the caps shift phase 90 degrees before voltage, at 0 V maybe its a peak current and no voltage, so no watts ( apparently not ), but current is there, if you could just take the current part and put the load on it ........ 

A guess, a step up transformer, you close S1 to induce current into T2, you open S1 and close S2 to feedback the voltage of secondary into primary, does it step up voltage to higher level, at each pulse you gain voltage ??? ??? ?  that setup in resonance to maintain the flow of energy....

xenomorphlabs

Quote from: frankidel on October 03, 2012, 09:27:51 PM

why should heaters need caps, maybe Kapa is only looking for current, not voltage, so the caps shift phase 90 degrees before voltage, at 0 V maybe its a peak current and no voltage, so no watts ( apparently not ), but current is there, if you could just take the current part and put the load on it ........ 

The idea is good.
Current wouldn't establish without voltage (potential difference) unfortunately. At that moment of 0V you have a moment of current magnitude, but you can't catch it because you would have to stop time but current is charge flowing over time itself. But what you can't catch in the time dimension you can catch in a space dimension by hooking to the current antinodes ;)

QuoteA guess, a step up transformer, you close S1 to induce current into T2, you open S1 and close S2 to feedback the voltage of secondary into primary, does it step up voltage to higher level, at each pulse you gain voltage ??? ??? ?  that setup in resonance to maintain the flow of energy....




If you could hypothetically reach a coupling of >=1 and pray to the gods to make it happen that the signals are in phase...
The current in the secondary will be lower by the factor of the turns ratio, so under "normal conditions" your induction current will steadily decrease until
it can't produce a magnetic field anymore. The coupling factor of a real transformer is underunity (k<1), so there are the losses.
The trick is to create high reactive power and find a way to turn that into usable power (by using capacitors to "catch" that reactive power, lift the PF again and doing so non-reflective to the source most importantly)

wattsup

@all

I have a few observations and refer to the TK-2004 diagram. I did a few quick tests just to get some base values on mains power consumption.

Mains 120vac 60Hz
Watt Counter plugged into mains.
Variac plugged into the watt counter.

Transformer 250VA as A-B (The transformer A-B that I used is a dual primary and dual secondary 2x2 120vac isolation type but I only used one of each. I had bought these for @Jacks tests.

Short Test. I shorted a wall plug into the variac output and watt counter showed 195 watts when the variac was only at 3vac. (Don't try this at home - lol.)

Variac then connected to transformer single primary with nothing on secondary with variac at 120vac showed 8 watts. (The Variac takes 6 of those.)

Added a bulb on the primary side at 120vac showed 117 watts with bulb fully bright.

Connected the FWBR AC side parallel to the primary and the bulb (nothing on secondary and FWBR DC side left open) and at 120vac showed 116 watts with bulb fully bright.

Connected the FWBR DC side to the secondary...

Following results at different Variac settings.
i.
a) At 3vac showed 28 watts and bulb not lit.
b) At 5vac showed 42 watts and bulb not lit.
c) At 7vac showed 108 watts and bulb not lit.
d) At 10vac showed  152 watts and bulb not lit.
e) At 15vac showed 308 watts bulb filament just started dimly.
f) At 20vac showed 512 watts and bulb just slightly brighter.
No signs of transformer stress but still, I did not want to go further........

SO........If the diode pack AC10 line was AC and the DC side went to the transformer secondary, the AC frequency must be much higher then 60Hz otherwise at 120vac  applied to the primary everything will just burn up and power consumption would be in the 1000s of watts. I don't want to go there.

But this does provide some idea on the energies at play if the diode plate DC is on the secondary. This is crucial to determine if this diode plate is or is not sending the DC to the secondary, or if the diode plate is being used as a standard FWBR.

I have placed a few close-ups of the diode plate. One very close trying to see the signage on the diode and the other of the complete diode plate showing that the diodes at that angle look like small saucers since you can see the shadow below the wide mounting washer. Can this signify the diode is another type like a zener type.

Maybe some guys can get more closeups of the signage and see if they can make it out.

@bass

The diagram addition you posted was made by who? It looks like a Russian file name. hehehe

When I did that diagram I was hoping someone would fill in the tin can.
Thanks for posting it.

It is good hard work indeed and it addresses almost all of the variables to work the design from one viewpoint.

I would maybe request another one but this time leave that internal transformer out and replace it with the TK coil. If you can convey this information to the guy that made that inset circuit, please ask him to consider the following.

1) Use the diode plate as DC pointing to the tin can that fills up a tank capacitor A to mains level DC.
2) Use the AC5 line as standard AC to fill up a second tank capacitor B to mains level AC.
3) Use one transistor to discharge the Cap A into the TK coil.
4) Use other transistor to discharge Cap B into the TK coil at the same time as #3.
5) Do not use any inductive coil inside the tin can.

wattsup

PS: I am also posting an image of some black coated transistors that I think are used in the 2004 device. That is why we have trouble seeing it compared to seeing the transistors in the green box video.

sparks

    An electron appears to be bound to a neucleus via the columb force.  For an analogy let's assume a tether ball attached to a bungie cord.  There exists x number of angstroms between the electron and the proton.  In the analogy the electron is stretching the bungie to it's max.  The force combating the columb force is the electron orbital momentum.  In the analogy the tether ball is going around at 1/6 the speed of light.    How do we ionize the atom?  We apply an electric field that  opposes the electron binding force.  The electric field drops the binding columb force to zero and electron moving at 1/6 the speed of light is available to collide with various targets to get energy from thin air.  This can happen in all sorts of combinations of elements when one considers that most of what we are comprised of is space.  Even our denses crystals are pretty thinned out.  This is not frindge science this is a proven fact that energy and mass are convertible.  The m/v of the bound electron is simply converted to the m/v of the electron going slower.  The difference between the M/v is energy.  E=MC2  Mass remains the same.  C is less or negative c.  Negative c squared times 1 gives you the amount of energy of the braking radiation produced.  Say electron is travelling at the speed of light.  It drops to .5 the speed of light.  -.5c x -.5c=.25c2 times mass= .25C2  amount of energy created per electron slowed down.
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love