Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 178 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on December 24, 2012, 07:55:18 AM
So why should he do that if this behavior is just due to a hidden battery in the faked device?
What if this device simply does not behave like an ordinary transformer, therefore the output voltage stays constant regardless of the load (at least up to a certain point)?
Just considering all possibilities ...
Even hidden batteries would not provide constant output voltage regardless of the load.

Constant voltage reading can be achieved with very low source impedance, faked measurement or active regulation.
I'm also considering all possibilities.

Zeitmaschine


Farmhand

Quote from: Zeitmaschine on December 24, 2012, 08:31:00 PM
Did you know? Batteries are obsolete since 1985:

Free energy TPU (Steve Marks) part1
Free energy TPU (Steve Marks) part2

That's one more thing to consider. 8)

A thing is only made obsolete if there is something to replace it that is proven to work better.
Where is the something better to replace batteries ?

Batteries are different to any "active circuit" device because they provide a stable dipole and can be made very small for many many different uses.
Using a double A battery to power a small transistor radio is very convenient. What beats that ?

Charge the batteries with solar energy it's free.

You could say batteries have been obsolete since the grid became available to people, but even with the grid people use batteries for convenience.

When the grid power goes out here the only thing that concerns me is the food in the freezer. and how long the power will be out.
I have 6 x 70 aH batteries and about 100 Watts of panels, I have one 800 Watt inverter that can run inductive loads.
As long as I can keep my food cold and run a light, I'm happy. If the grid went off tomorrow and never came back on I would find a way to survive.
I also have a fuel generator but I don't like to use it because it is noisy.

In my opinion we all should already have a plan in place in case the grid fails and never comes back on line. 

I'm lucky, if worst comes to worst I can light a fire to cook food and keep warm, I keep livestock so I can feed myself and others as well.
Everyone should have chickens if it's possible and those who can keep them should fight for the right to keep a rooster,
screw the complainers about the noise, it's a national security issue.

What annoys me is there is supposedly an energy crisis and yet look at all the fancy lights at night by the big consumers who get thier energy cheap.
Shopping centers, C a s i n o ' s and such. Our entire society is geared to the increased use of electrical energy and increased waste of all things.

Advertising and consumerism needs to have a war waged on it. Frugality and conservation should be rewarded rather than laughed at.

eg. I know of a motorcycle retailer who when a bike battery goes flat he discards it and claims it back on tax because it is the easiest thing for him to do and it is allowed.
the battery might be only used once or twice to start the bike for customers. No skin off his nose it costs him nothing. This is the kind of thinking that is the ruination of all things.

Cheers

wattsup

@Sergey77

I tried the Mustafa circuit but not at 220vac since I am at 110vac. So I cut the values in half and used two transformers of 110vac to 18vac and used a C1 of 30 uF instead of 60uF. But there is not effect. The 30uF capacitor is not letting the P1 secondary to pass energy. I tried with a 53 uF and no difference. There must be a mistake in that circuit having the C1 capacitor in series. Or, it really requires 220vac to make the energy jump the C1 dielectric. Hmmmm. Maybe that is how he is using the capacitor as a low voltage spark gap. Don't know yet. Has anyone in Russia replicated this with a youtube.

@all

A few guys have e-mailed me to explain how the Aq2 thin wire that is hidden in the shield wire could run a 1500 watt heating element. This is a valid question and concern so I will attempt to explain but please realize that others here may be better to explain this.

TK - Aq2

We see a nice heating element light up. But how is it possible with such a thin wire coming in with the shield wire as we all can now confirm for ourselves, a hidden wire EXISTS.

So let's say they want to show the heating element but their only source of input energy comes in via that thin wire. The spark gap is the clue since we already had a @member confirm the spark gap was oscillating at 10 hertz and with my VirtualDubMod video program that lets me see at 30 frames per second, the spark is on at every third frame. So the thin wire, could still have a standard input at 220vac at 50Hz and spark gap is at 10Hz. Hmmmmm.

First question is - why did TK use a heating element. He never used such a load in the other smaller devices so why now. Why not use 3 x 500 watt bulbs, or 2 x 1000 watts bulbs like he did before. Well because in the other devices he used straight mains with unlimited voltage and amperage going to the devices and in the case of the Aq2, well because the output was definitely below 50 Hz and anything below 50Hz on a bulb would have been noticed by your eye as flickering, therefore you would have noticed the on/off event which is not desirable when you want to show so many watts.

In contrast, a reddened heating element has its own physical delay time for the element to start cooling off so you have a greater dead time potential without you noticing any visual flickering of the element. This means you can turn on and off a heating element 10 times per second and that element will remain a steady red color. It will never be full red because there is no 50Hz but the difference in redness from 50Hz to 10 Hz will not be 1/5th but maybe 3/5th because of the physical delay. Also, they never plugged the heater directly into the means socket so you are not able to make the real visual comparison. So whatever you see in the element brightness you will consider as normal because you have no real basis to compare.

So in the Aq2, TK used time to his advantage. At switch off, the longer the element stays red before visually going dimmer, the more time TK has to load his discharge coil without sacrificing the visual effect. If that triple element heater was rated at 1500 watts, and they were fed a pulsed input at 10Hz instead of a full 50Hz, that element could have stayed red with only 500 watts or less. That would be consistent with an 18AWG wire of 20 feet at 2 amps transporting 240vac at 50Hz.

Since the feed supply was unlimited AC the only real limitation was how thick the white hidden wire could be before anyone would flagrantly notice the shield wire had a hidden conductor inside it. That is the amperage availability limitation that set the 10Hz duty cycle to the load. All they had to do is supply the 240 vac 50Hz into a tank capacitor bank and discharge it in parallel at 10Hz straight into the heating element as well as take a part of that discharge via a bridge rectifier and pulse a HV coil to produce the spark at the same time. Since the spark is an accepted visual oscillating medium that will not cause such a high level of doubt, this would distract you from seeing the heater element should it have flickered as well.

So again the Aq2 is just an illusion using a thin wire feed source, a heat element that provides visual effect delay and using that delay time to load a discharge capacitor bank. There is nothing OU about it. Only more tricks. Based on this, it does not matter how big the illusion is, the base principle is the same. David Copperfield can make a mouse disappear or a plane disappear. One is no more real then the other?

@Zeitmaschine and @cheappower2012

Let me just say that SM also F'd all his devices. If you want me to expand on this just ask, but realize that both TK and SM devices are a total waste of time.

wattsup


verpies

Quote from: wattsup on December 25, 2012, 11:12:27 AM
In contrast, a reddened heating element has its own physical delay time for the element to start cooling off so you have a greater dead time potential without you noticing any visual flickering of the element. This means you can turn on and off a heating element 10 times per second and that element will remain a steady red color. It will never be full red because there is no 50Hz but the difference in redness from 50Hz to 10 Hz will not be 1/5th but maybe 3/5th because of the physical delay. Also, they never plugged the heater directly into the means socket so you are not able to make the real visual comparison. So whatever you see in the element brightness you will consider as normal because you have no real basis to compare.
Power is proportional to the duty cycle, not the frequency.  10Hz waveform will deliver the same power to the filament as the same waveform at 50Hz.
The 1sec. integration time provided by the heater's filament, will prevent any flicker above 1Hz.
Charging capacitor by the hidden wire does not prevent heating of that wire.

With, this explanation you just had outdone yourself.  It makes little sense and is scientifically incorrect.

The Ockham's Razor principle points in the direction of high voltage in the hidden wire.  This is easy to generate with a step-up transformer.